I don't really understand this boards hate for Draymond, sure he isn't a scorer and shoots like shyt but what he brings to the court isn't easily replaceable. But I realize a lot of y'all can't see that because y'all watch boxscores and not games.
I think it's his personality that rubs people the wrong way.I don't really understand this boards hate for Draymond, sure he isn't a scorer and shoots like shyt but what he brings to the court isn't easily replaceable. But I realize a lot of y'all can't see that because y'all watch boxscores and not games.
That's cool and understandable.I think it's his personality that rubs people the wrong way.
This is true but at the same time I also don't think you can just plug and play any role player into Draymond's role.It's because his effectiveness is directly tied to Stephen Curry. We all saw his impact last year when Steph was hurt; minimal.
Look at the Charlotte game a week ago when Steph was out sick versus last night. 75% of his high assist numbers should count towards Steph's totals. He's a good passer but Steph gets him so many easy opportunities because he gets trapped all over the floor on and off the ball.
So just eliminate the whole other side of the ball for your agenda correct?It's because his effectiveness is directly tied to Stephen Curry. We all saw his impact last year when Steph was hurt; minimal.
Look at the Charlotte game a week ago when Steph was out sick versus last night. 75% of his high assist numbers should count towards Steph's totals. He's a good passer but Steph gets him so many easy opportunities because he gets trapped all over the floor on and off the ball.
This is where you guys go overboard. In no way, shape or form is Draymond a Hall of Famer. Not even close.He’s basically a coach on the floor and just like a coach to be successful from the sidelines you need the personnel to execute.
it’s why dray a hall of gamer wether you like it or not
What did that effectiveness do last year? Dray does his role well but he has to have other good players around him to have a meaningful impact. That's why he's a great ROLE player but you guys always go overboard with the hyperbole for him.So just eliminate the whole other side of the ball for your agenda correct?
That's fair.This is true but at the same time I also don't think you can just plug and play any role player into Draymond's role.
WTF nikka THATS EXACTLY WHAT THE fukk IM SAYINGWhat did that effectiveness do last year? Dray does his role well but he has to have other good players around him to have a meaningful impact. That's why he's a great ROLE player but you guys always go overboard with the hyperbole for him.