Draymond On Paul Pierce Career

[Houston911]

Draymond is a clown

 

[AlfredTheButler]

Trade him to the Brooklyn Nets and see the wonders his basketball iq do

you put him in brooklyn and the nets gets substantially better....championship contender level ? no but then again there's no single player you could put there short of lebron that would push them at that level...and prime paul pierce wouldn't make them any better either so what's your point?

 

[stepbackj34spud]

you put him in brooklyn and the nets gets substantially better....championship contender level ? no but then again there's no single player you could put there short of lebron that would push them at that level...and prime paul pierce wouldn't make them any better either so what's your point?

Lmao @ this clown. Lol @ the thought of a Draymomd Green lead team being any good.

 

[Reggie]

Pierce was always nice and Draymond must not have looked at the game enough to know that if believes otherwise. Paul may not have had the prettiest game but it was more than effective and he was consistently getting 21-25 a night in his prime. Draymond will end up with more rings of course but individually he can see Pierce on the court at their best.

 

[AlfredTheButler]

Lmao @ this clown. Lol @ the thought of a Draymomd Green lead team being any good.

care to state your case as to how pierce is in an entirely different class than green...one that isn't filled with hypotheticals and logical fallacies...a lot of people calling me out but no one with the good shyt to refute what im saying

 

[stepbackj34spud]

care to state your case as to how pierce is in an entirely different class than green...one that isn't filled with hypotheticals and logical fallacies...a lot of people calling me out but no one with the good shyt to refute what im saying

Aren't you basing your posts off hypotheticals considering Green has never lead any team anywhere, and he's never been the best player on any NBA team?

Do you know how foolish you sound??

 

[AlfredTheButler]

Aren't you basing your posts off hypotheticals considering Green has never lead any team anywhere, and he's never been the best player on any NBA team?

Do you know how foolish you sound??

green has been an integral part of 2 championship team by being the best defender on his team and in the league...who the fukk cares about being the best player on a team if that team barely plays .500 ball.....people need to stop with this notion that the benchmark to being a good player is how much you improve a shytty team.....we've seen pierce in this situation and the results are not very good.....we don't know how green would do in this scenario what we know is that he can make a good team great and that's what matters....pierce too for that matter....and i never once said green was better than pierce without a shadow of a doubt...the only thing i said and i still maintain is that it's a lot closer than ya'll willing to admit and being that my goal is to win a championship on not simply to make a shytty team average then in that particular scenario id rather have a guy like green his skillset is harder to find and more conducive to winning........you know what's the greatest luxury? a guy who doesn't need the ball to impact the game......a lot of guys are good with the ball...a guy like lou williams can score efficiently with the best of em but the problem is there's only one ball...most players when they don't get the ball they become worthless..look at a guy like westbrook and how much of a hard time other good players have playing with him....paul pierce with westbrook wouldn't work the same way westbrook and melo doesn't work.......westbrook with draymond would still work without any diminishing return whatsoever....pierce and green would work too the same way garnett and pierce worked...fukk it i already dropped too much knowledge about how bball is played and you ain't worth it...you just a stan ...stans ain't worth shyt

 

[stepbackj34spud]

green has been an integral part of 2 championship team by being the best defender on his team and in the league...who the fukk cares about being the best player on a team if that team barely plays .500 ball.....people need to stop with this notion that the benchmark to being a good player is how much you improve a shytty team.....we've seen pierce in this situation and the results are not very good.....we don't know how green would do in this scenario what we know is that he can make a good team great and that's what matters....pierce too for that matter....and i never once said green was better than pierce without a shadow of a doubt...the only thing i said and i still maintain is that it's a lot closer than ya'll willing to admit and being that my goal is to win a championship on not simply to make a shytty team average then in that particular scenario id rather have a guy like green his skillset is harder to find and more conducive to winning........you know what's the greatest luxury? a guy who doesn't need the ball to impact the game......a lot of guys are good with the ball...a guy like lou williams can score efficiently with the best of em but the problem is there's only one ball...most players when they don't get the ball they become worthless..look at a guy like westbrook and how much of a hard time other good players have playing with him....paul pierce with westbrook wouldn't work the same way westbrook and melo doesn't work.......westbrook with draymond would still work without any diminishing return whatsoever....pierce and green would work too the same way garnett and pierce worked...fukk it i already dropped too much knowledge about how bball is played and you ain't worth it...you just a stan ...stans ain't worth shyt

Man shutup and welcome to my ignore lit. You sound like a fukking idiot.

 

[AlfredTheButler]

Man shutup and welcome to my ignore lit. You sound like a fukking idiot.

go head pooh butt who can't argue for shyt

 

[NatiboyB]

Bullshyt Draymond is a product of his environment

players like pierce are dime a dozen while players like green are extremly hard to find.....green does the little things that in the end are the most important and will often put you over the top....players like pierce are often on .500 1 and done teams...smh at people using scoring numbers to argue that pierce was better than green is.....it's extremely close either way

 

[Wacky D]

Suck a dikk you fukking fakkit. 15th on the alltime scoring list but hes baerly a top 100 player. You are a fukking idiot. Welcome to my ignore list bytch nikka. Dont bother responding.

you gay as chit.

get homotional over someone who could care less about you, and wouldn't help you if you get caught offline for talking tough behind a keyboard.

Paul Pierce as far as basketball goes can eat a dikk and his stans can too, but its mad disrespectful to undervalue a nikka who carried a talentless ass squad for years and to over value what fagmond has been gifted with. They've had the best built fukking roster of all time two years in a row.

pierce didn't carry anything tho.

they went nowhere with him as the clear #1 option.

not saying that's his fault. just saying pierce has never orchestrated any carry-jobs.

Those little things you keep mentioning have value only because he's surrounded with all stars. They concretize the little things he does not the other way around

he wasn't surrounded by all-star at Michigan state. that didn't stop him one bit.

and while I don't think he would be an all-star if he didn't play with the warriors, hes still an integral part of the team. just look at how vital his presence and suspension were to multiple series' in the '16 playoffs.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

I don't have a clue how anyone can cosign the way this team conducts themselves.

 

[DirkDizzler]

you gay as chit.

get homotional over someone who could care less about you, and wouldn't help you if you get caught offline for talking tough behind a keyboard.





pierce didn't carry anything tho.

they went nowhere with him as the clear #1 option.

not saying that's his fault. just saying pierce has never orchestrated any carry-jobs.





he wasn't surrounded by all-star at Michigan state. that didn't stop him one bit.

and while I don't think he would be an all-star if he didn't play with the warriors, hes still an integral part of the team. just look at how vital his presence and suspension were to multiple series' in the '16 playoffs.

They went to the conference finals with him being the clear number one. What are you talking about

 

[Kobes Two Jerseys]

The real question is whether or not PP could lock down Kareem like Draymond.

 

[Draje]

This is weird. I hear dudes saying Green ain't shyt and not important them say his suspension is the reason GSW lost in the finals