Not going to go in on this guy when Lena Dunham wasn't touched with a 10 ft pole.![]()
I have never heard of that can you explain your point?


1: she was a childNot going to go in on this guy when Lena Dunham wasn't touched with a 10 ft pole.![]()
Lmao she was turning out her sister for 10 years until she (Lena) was 171: she was a child
2: wasn't being a hypocrite about it


By having that many kids their ages obviously range quite a bit. In a family of no sex before marriage it wouldn't be much of a stretch to think that one kid who's a little off would molest a sibling. shyt happens in small families who aren't religious so it just seems like all of the normal triggers are abundantly present in that family.
Also in religious families abuse is less likely to be reported so one could get away with it for longer than once or twice.
Edit: also funny how this comes out only after the statute of limitations ran out. But they love their kids right? Sick fukks.
Lmao she was turning out her sister for 10 years until she (Lena) was 17
![]()

So he's a child molester, was reported to authorities for assaulting multiple girls, but given a stern talking to by a cop who happened to also be a pedo; has no post-secondary degree or political experience, yet was working as a lobbyist (who can earn upwards of 90k a year) in DC?
Cac privilege is just![]()

how do these factors come together to create an abuser?
So he's a child molester, was reported to authorities for assaulting multiple girls, but given a stern talking to by a cop who happened to also be a pedo; has no post-secondary degree or political experience, yet was working as a lobbyist (who can earn upwards of 90k a year) in DC?
Cac privilege is just![]()
