
Hell I want the Lakers to end up with Josh Jackson so I wouldn't mind that either.
Quality > Quantity
Exactly two potential good prospects vs one potential good prospectWhich is why they need to get quality players. Trade down and get two.
Which is why they need to get quality players. Trade down and get two.
Ford has 0 insight with the lakers pure speculation. Local reports have it either ball or JJChad dropped an article today saying it's a split in the front office right now. Called it a 40/35/25 split. Lonzo has 40..Josh has 35 and Fox with 25 percent split.
Exactly two potential good prospects vs one potential good prospect
He upside for fox is supposed to be high but two good players who also have good upside is never the wrong answer unless it's a sure fire pick
If it was josh Jackson or fultz I'd understand but fox wasn't even top five pick until he workouts started happening plus he weighs 160 and would be running a backcourt wih buddy hield
Meh, they already have quality players.
Not really though. The front court is trash. Clarkson is a 6th man combo guard, D'loading can't guard, and may never been an all star quality player, and Ingram is still two years away from being an effective starter -- and he's my favorite of the bunch.
They need a game changer and someone that can bring the team together, that's Lonzo.
I don't disagree with the idea, but I'm not sure Lonzo is the game changing talent y'all need.
He's tailor made for Luke's offense and the roster, we don't need a Dennis Smith or Tatum when we already have guys better than those 2 at their position.
Ford has 0 insight with the lakers pure speculation. Local reports have it either ball or JJ
atleast Holmestape has been to the playoffs in recent years and are the second marketable team after Lakers.Should the Knicks stay around?![]()