Dwyane Wade....Will He Even Average 20 PPG This Season????
- Thread starter William Bassington
- Start date
SpittinThatKnowledge
Banned
He's already a Lakers fan.he needs to go another "Barry Bonds" "cycle"
I want to see if ThugLife will still be a Heat fan when Lebron leaves Miami and come to the Lakers when he will be able to opt-out in 2014...
Dude will probably become a Lakers fan then
Majestic Pape
The-Coli = W SOHH = L
Why would you expect a third option to score 20 a night?
Kobes Two Jerseys
8 or 24 best player of the era
Kobes first three rings, legit!
Kobes Two Jerseys
8 or 24 best player of the era
Coming off the bench , right?lol kobe's 34, been in the league 16 years and is still option number 1 on HIS team. Dwight, Pau, Nash came and Kobe's still top option.
Can you say the same for Wade?Homeboy is 3rd, probably 4th option on his team now
If he gets 20, 5, and 4 a game for the rest of his career and wins a couple more championships before he calls it quits then I honestly don't see what the big deal is. He is over 30 and I'm guessing cares more about the rings then the numbers at this point.
Also he only played about 9 of those 13 games this season so his numbers could improve.
The Informant
Rookie
It's still early..he'll pick it up
At their peak, Wade was a more efficient, productive player. It's just fact.
No. He's 45% for the career and 12 games don't change that.
A big part of this is that Wade almost always begins seasons slowly.
Dwyane Wade: Notoriously slow starter - Hot Hot Hoops
Dwyane Wade: Notoriously slow starter - Hot Hot Hoops
GreatestLaker
#FirePelinka
Wade isn't in Kobe's league. Kobe at 30 was still arguably the best player in the league, you can make a strong case that Wade isn't even in the top 10 today.
He's no top ten.
There are two different ways to look at this. You can value longevity however much you want to in your subjective All-Time rankings.
But there is no question that at their peak, Wade was a more productive efficient player. It's not like he came and went in three years. He's had nearly a decade of elite production that is actually better than Bryant's.
You can defer to arbitrary things like longevity and production after 30, but looking at their best seasons is a clear measure of who was better.
He was third in the league in PER last year. Your probably overreacting to a slow start, which he always has. Coming into the season, he was absolutely a top ten player and arguably a top five one.
