It’s not as deep as folks make it.
as someone who’s in advertising, it’s typically done in an effort to reach multiple demographics in a single piece of creative. It’s mostly a cost-saving technique.
A single ad can be leveraged to target more audiences. All these ‘great replacement theory’ conspiracies are a little hackneyed.
They are going to ignore this.
Okay so this makes senseIt’s not as deep as folks make it.
as someone who’s in advertising, it’s typically done in an effort to reach multiple demographics in a single piece of creative. It’s mostly a cost-saving technique.
A single ad can be leveraged to target more audiences. All these ‘great replacement theory’ conspiracies are a little hackneyed.
Okay so this makes sense
By why is it never Hispanics?
It’s not as deep as folks make it.
as someone who’s in advertising, it’s typically done in an effort to reach multiple demographics in a single piece of creative. It’s mostly a cost-saving technique.
A single ad can be leveraged to target more audiences. All these ‘great replacement theory’ conspiracies are a little hackneyed.
So can't the same goal be achieved by using BM/WW? Why can't they use WM/LW or WM/AW? If you don't think they're not doing this on purpose then you're being delusional.It’s not as deep as folks make it.
as someone who’s in advertising, it’s typically done in an effort to reach multiple demographics in a single piece of creative. It’s mostly a cost-saving technique.
A single ad can be leveraged to target more audiences. All these ‘great replacement theory’ conspiracies are a little hackneyed.
Lmao @ anyone who believes this bullshyt. This makes ZERO sense when the interracial pairing in question in IN THE MINORITY. So how the hell could what you’re saying be true when you’re catering to a niche and alienating the majority?as someone who’s in advertising, it’s typically done in an effort to reach multiple demographics
1. Remember when the dude that played Otis was in that Cheerios commercial with the cac woman and mixed daughter? They had people petitioning to have the commercial removed, yet we're not seeing the outrage over all of these bedwench commercials.
It's like how The Walking Dead show had swirl 2. couples cosplaying as Ric & Michonne, but when the black actors got with the non black actresses the same swirlers were talking about "Where's the black love". White men who create these commercials always want to be seen as the alphas, and then you have these wenches who see white men together with a black woman as the ultimate validation.
So can't the same goal be achieved by using BM/WW? Why can't they use WM/LW or WM/AW? If you don't think they're not doing this on purpose then you're being delusional.
Brought this up already The Official Toronto Discussion Thread
You full of shytIt’s not as deep as folks make it.
as someone who’s in advertising, it’s typically done in an effort to reach multiple demographics in a single piece of creative. It’s mostly a cost-saving technique.
A single ad can be leveraged to target more audiences. All these ‘great replacement theory’ conspiracies are a little hackneyed.