I don't know. Why hasn't the cure for AIDS been found yet?Yes we know the Senate at the time had 58 democrats and 2 independents along with the House was enough to get shyt done for obamacare...Now why couldnt that happen with Wallstreet reform?

I don't know. Why hasn't the cure for AIDS been found yet?Yes we know the Senate at the time had 58 democrats and 2 independents along with the House was enough to get shyt done for obamacare...Now why couldnt that happen with Wallstreet reform?

I don't know.

And you don't know why it didn't happen either.I knew that before I asked you but I thought id give it a try![]()

Yes. Something that isn't even the right word to use in this situation happenedpayola![]()

Yes. Something that isn't even the right word to use in this situation happened![]()

isn't she on the banking committee? Wasn't she an author of TARP? There's a a lot of things she could do besides talk.
When things don't look good Democrats are the first to jump ship. I do remember how disgusted the Republicans were after the election in 2008. And I dod remember Mitch McConnell saying this:
The president had a solid House against him and bytch azz Democrats on his side. In all honestly, Wall Street has always ran the White House and they run circles around the regulators (SEC).
Still doesnt change the fact that Dems had control of Congress and the Presidency in '09 though.. If they was really about that life they could have jammed whatever meaningful WallStreet reform legislation through the pipeline before repubs took back the House in '10..but as I said before payola gets in the way
Man, you don't even need to point towards that alone. Larry summers, Geithner, Holder, having health insurance companies at the table from the start. Extending Bush tax cuts. Then you have him putting lobbyists in charge of the FCC. Having his justice department and homeland security department work at the behest of banks to stomp out the occupy wall street protests.
It's disgusting. Reaganomics light.
Still doesnt change the fact that Dems had control of Congress and the Presidency in '09 though.. If they was really about that life they could have jammed whatever meaningful WallStreet reform legislation through the pipeline before repubs took back the House in '10..but as I said before payola gets in the way
I see your point, agree with your point, but I think you should angle your point in a different direction. Established democrats are about the status quo. They have no problem going back to the 2004 economy as long as they can prevent or prolong the 2007 recession. (I hope that sentence made sense).
So while you have a long term goal of financial stability, those democrats, along with those republicans, have a vision of long term profits. Two different end games really.
So though they had control of the house and senate, they were too scared of reconfiguring the system because they honestly had no problem with it in the first place. They were more afraid of losing congressional seats by telling the truth than fixing the system and setting the record straight.
I hope that made sense. I'm drunk. My points may be too vague (it took me 5 tries to write vague)