Elizabeth Warren unveils bold new plan to reshape America's richest companies

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
77,559
Reputation
9,590
Daps
232,281
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC


Elizabeth Warren, the Massachusetts senator tipped as a Democratic presidential candidate in 2020, has unveiled new plans for legislation aimed at reining in big corporations, redistributing wealth, and giving workers and local communities a bigger say.

Warren will introduce the bill dubbed the Accountable Capitalism Act on Wednesday. The proposal aims to alter a model she says has caused corporations to chase profits for shareholders to the detriment of workers.

Under the legislation, corporations with more than $1bn in annual revenue would be required to obtain a corporate charter from the federal government – and the document would mandate that companies not just consider the financial interests of shareholders.

Instead, businesses would have to consider all major corporate stakeholders – which could include workers, customers, and the cities and towns where those corporations operate.



Anyone who owns shares in the company could sue if they believed corporate directors were not meeting their obligations.

Employees at large corporations would be able to elect at least 40% of the board of directors. An estimated 3,500 public US companies and hundreds of other private companies would be covered by the mandates.

In an article announcing the bill, Warren said she was looking to reverse “a fundamental change in business practices” dating back three decades that made corporations beholden to the bottom line at the expense of better worker wages and local investment.

“The obsession with maximizing shareholder returns effectively means America’s biggest companies have dedicated themselves to making the rich even richer,” she wrote in the Wall Street Journal.

The proposal would create a new Office of United States Corporations within the Department of Commerce, which would be responsible for granting the charters – and which could revoke a charter if a state attorney general requests it, and the office finds the firm has a history of egregious and repeated illegal conduct and has failed take action to correct it.

Large companies dedicated 93% of their earnings to shareholders between 2007 and 2016 – a shift from the early 1980s, when they sent less than half their revenue to shareholders and spent the rest on employees and other priorities, Warren said.

“Real wages have stagnated even as productivity has continued to rise. Workers aren’t getting what they’ve earned. Companies also are setting themselves up to fail,” she wrote.

Corporations currently get their charters at the state level.

The legislation would also require 75% of directors and shareholders to approve before a corporation could make political expenditures.

Some criticised the idea, calling it excessive government control.

“The last thing I want is Elizabeth Warren telling companies what they can or cannot do,” Kevin Kelly, the CEO of Benchmark Investments, said on Fox Business. “The private market will reward those that take care of their stakeholders.”

Steve Forbes, the chairman of Forbes Media and failed presidential candidate, said on the same show that the proposal would lead to “stagnation”.

He said: “What she’s talking about is freezing the economy as it is, keeping things as they are. That’s just not going to work.”

But a group of academics studying the economics and history of corporations endorsed the approach in a letter to Warren.

“We believe legislation along these lines to be long overdue,” wrote the group, led by Cornell University law professor Robert Hockett. “While some of us would like to go even further than the Act does, we all agree that your legislation takes the critical first steps in realigning our regime of incorporation with its original purposes.”
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
42,687
Reputation
22,006
Daps
132,813
Instead, businesses would have to consider all major corporate stakeholders – which could include workers, customers, and the cities and towns where those corporations operate.

Sounds nice but how though?

So she's basically calling to reinstate legislation from before the Reagan era that kept a lot of this hyper-profit mindset in check.

Actually she's calling for a lot more than that, but I'll keep that to myself.
 

Ciggavelli

|∞||∞||∞||∞|
Supporter
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
28,237
Reputation
6,683
Daps
58,094
Reppin
Houston
This will directly impact me, as I work for an extremely wealthy and extremely large corporation, but I’m not sure in which way. I’m happy with my salary, which is well above average for workers in my field (I do UX research).

Will this actually increase my salary, or will it be regulation that decreases my salary, Or neither? :jbhmm:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
328,897
Reputation
-34,075
Daps
635,169
Reppin
The Deep State
This will directly impact me, as I work for an extremely wealthy and extremely large corporation, but I’m not sure in which way. I’m happy with my salary, which is well above average for workers in my field (I do UX research).

Will this actually increase my salary, or will it be regulation that decreases my salary, Or neither? :jbhmm:
basically she'll make it German
 

ogc163

Superstar
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
9,027
Reputation
2,145
Daps
22,330
Reppin
Bronx, NYC
Employees at large corporations would be able to elect at least 40% of the board of directors. An estimated 3,500 public US companies and hundreds of other private companies would be covered by the mandates.

Hmmm this jumped out at me, shareholders already don't have a great deal of power and weight when it comes large corporation's BOD, and further diluting what power they have doesn't seem like a great idea. I get the impetus, but I am skeptical in how it would work out in practice especially when great discrepancies in resources and knowledge exist.
 

Prince.Skeletor

Don’t Be Like He-Man
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
29,695
Reputation
-6,854
Daps
58,241
Reppin
Bucktown
In America where people sue you for looking at them the wrong way?

Well what we have now sucks too.

Will need to read more about this.
The idea is not new though.

She's basically just going to take votes away from Bernie.
However I suspect Bernie would support this bill.
 
Top