So what about the player?..theyre willing to have the discussion and most say kobe. What does that tell you?
Nothing.
Why do people act like players have some special insight that others cannot have? When you take a lot of the fanboy-ness out of it (which is a big part of this sort of thing)...when you take out the biases people have because of their preference for the aesthetics of one player's game over another's....and you try to look at things objectively....you get a more accurate answer of what the truth is.
Hell, most "fans" and "players" didn't even like to give Tim Duncan his due while he was playing because of how his game looked...or how un-flashy he was as a personality. It was only reluctantly as he was retiring and they took in the breadth of all his winning and records that they acknowledged (barely) how great he actually was.
The same will be done for Lebron...albeit to a lesser degree because for whatever reason Lebron stirs a certain level of hate that Timmy never did. (Arguably because the league was never considered Tim's, to have been taken from Kobe the way it was perceived that Lebron took it from Kobe...which is probably why so many of the Lebron haters are Kobe stans. This connection is not accidental.)