Government allowed sponsorship might as well be.This isn't government censorship
Any government that allows this to happen is just as complacent. And basically sponsors it.
EU, Congress, and Silicon Valley Caught Political/Ideological Fade, Now Censoring Alt/Indy Media
- Thread starter newworldafro
- Start date
Any government that allows this to happen is just as complacent. And basically sponsors it.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
This isn't government censorship
Well as OP explains ...... Senate Quietly Passes The "Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act"
Save the zerohegde dismissal. It's all right there in that article. This is the origin of Russian Collusion Delusion.
The "delusion" parts starts when BHO signed this into law. Although he didn't have much of a choice, because it was an amendment to National Defense Authorization Act for 2017. The fukkbois slipped it in there.
They grabbed our rights by the pusssy, so to speak.......and you (and so many others) thought it was just the private sector on it's own.
Last edited:
The government is currently silencing scientists, lying whenever there is a brief, and you're making a muck about you tube. 
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Really you can just watch the whole thing, but time stamped @6:50 all the way through. It explains that this censorship is not just private corporations, as has been said before...it's real collusion with various entities..
... aka these are 1st Amendment violations taking place
... aka these are 1st Amendment violations taking place
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Bi-Partisan Senate Intelligence Committe Investigation says there is no Collusion.
MSNBC reporting.
It's over.
But it's not over. The point of this thread waa to explain they are using fake collusion allegations as the impetus to go after speech.
MSNBC reporting.
It's over.
But it's not over. The point of this thread waa to explain they are using fake collusion allegations as the impetus to go after speech.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Poynter Institute, a non-profit journalism organization, list 500 sites they want blacklisted and and advertisers to stop supporting, because they call them fake news sites......I wonder if The Onion
Goes to the OP, traditional media has lost viewers, advertisement dollars, and influence, and there only way to beat new alt/indy media is to attempt to censor/ban.
Goes to the OP, traditional media has lost viewers, advertisement dollars, and influence, and there only way to beat new alt/indy media is to attempt to censor/ban.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
__________________________________________
Congress, Federal Trade Commission, and Department of Justice are conducting antitrust investigation on Facebook, Google/Youtube, Amazon, and Apple for their "anti-competitive behavior"(
), since they are near monopolies.
AP
https://time.com
As a result of the start of investigation they lost $137 billion in value in a few hours Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
Congress, Federal Trade Commission, and Department of Justice are conducting antitrust investigation on Facebook, Google/Youtube, Amazon, and Apple for their "anti-competitive behavior"(
), since they are near monopolies.AP
https://time.com
As a result of the start of investigation they lost $137 billion in value in a few hours Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
Last edited:
Government attacks free speech and OP is quiet.
Private business decides that hate speech will not be allowed to profit off of their platform and OP loses his shyt.
Typical NC conservative cac
Private business decides that hate speech will not be allowed to profit off of their platform and OP loses his shyt.
Typical NC conservative cac
Pull Up the Roots
Breakfast for dinner.
@newworldafro
Leaked Draft of Trump Executive Order to 'Censor the Internet' Denounced as Dangerous, Unconstitutional Edict
Civil liberties groups are warning of a major threat to online freedoms and First Amendment rights if a leaked draft of a Trump administration edict—dubbed by critics as a "Censor the Internet" executive order that would give powerful federal agencies far-reaching powers to pick and choose which kind of Internet material is and is not acceptable—is allowed to go into effect.
According to CNN, which obtained a copy of the draft, the new rule "calls for the FCC to develop new regulations clarifying how and when the law protects social media websites when they decide to remove or suppress content on their platforms. Although still in its early stages and subject to change, the Trump administration's draft order also calls for the Federal Trade Commission to take those new policies into account when it investigates or files lawsuits against misbehaving companies."
While Politico was the first to report how the draft was being circulated by the White House, CNN notes that if put into effect, "the order would reflect a significant escalation by President Trump in his frequent attacks against social media companies over an alleged but unproven systemic bias against conservatives by technology platforms. And it could lead to a significant reinterpretation of a law that, its authors have insisted, was meant to give tech companies broad freedom to handle content as they see fit."
Following reporting on the leaked draft, free speech and online advocacy groups raised alarm about the troubling and far-reaching implications of the Trump plan if it was put into effect by executive decree.
Leaked Draft of Trump Executive Order to 'Censor the Internet' Denounced as Dangerous, Unconstitutional Edict
Civil liberties groups are warning of a major threat to online freedoms and First Amendment rights if a leaked draft of a Trump administration edict—dubbed by critics as a "Censor the Internet" executive order that would give powerful federal agencies far-reaching powers to pick and choose which kind of Internet material is and is not acceptable—is allowed to go into effect.
According to CNN, which obtained a copy of the draft, the new rule "calls for the FCC to develop new regulations clarifying how and when the law protects social media websites when they decide to remove or suppress content on their platforms. Although still in its early stages and subject to change, the Trump administration's draft order also calls for the Federal Trade Commission to take those new policies into account when it investigates or files lawsuits against misbehaving companies."
While Politico was the first to report how the draft was being circulated by the White House, CNN notes that if put into effect, "the order would reflect a significant escalation by President Trump in his frequent attacks against social media companies over an alleged but unproven systemic bias against conservatives by technology platforms. And it could lead to a significant reinterpretation of a law that, its authors have insisted, was meant to give tech companies broad freedom to handle content as they see fit."
Following reporting on the leaked draft, free speech and online advocacy groups raised alarm about the troubling and far-reaching implications of the Trump plan if it was put into effect by executive decree.
Pull Up the Roots
Breakfast for dinner.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
@Return to Forever
^^^^^^ What he needs to do is get his Congressional folks to re-think the two laws they passed in 2013 and 2016 first, that I talk about here, EU, Congress, and Silicon Valley Caught Political/Ideological Fade, Now Censoring Alt/Indy Media
As long as they are on the books, then yeah you just adding more layers of bureaucracy anyway. I get what he's doing, conservatives have been censored the most, but essentially everyone is being censored if they not in line with specific agendas or profits to be made.
We don't want additional interference in the internet, but what that article and tweet doesn't tell you is the interference already in effect from 2013 and 2016.
^^^^^^ What he needs to do is get his Congressional folks to re-think the two laws they passed in 2013 and 2016 first, that I talk about here, EU, Congress, and Silicon Valley Caught Political/Ideological Fade, Now Censoring Alt/Indy Media
As long as they are on the books, then yeah you just adding more layers of bureaucracy anyway. I get what he's doing, conservatives have been censored the most, but essentially everyone is being censored if they not in line with specific agendas or profits to be made.
We don't want additional interference in the internet, but what that article and tweet doesn't tell you is the interference already in effect from 2013 and 2016.
Last edited: