Every Single Team in the NFC could make the Playoffs this year.

jfkennedy

Best After Bobby
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
11,444
Reputation
1,121
Daps
18,739
I don't give a fukk what you factored in, what you DIDN'T factor in is how the Redskins went 7-0 down the stretch and its defense was top 5 in the league during that span :whew:
You also didn't factor in that you still would of lost last year if Josh Morgan didn't get that unsportmanlike penalty, or if Pierre Garcon was playing. Or the fact we improved as well all over, B.Orakpo got injured early in that game too.
We got new players, we got old players back like Roy Helu who was injured last year as well. Bruh, you literally didn't factor in a single thing about the Redskins It was a new offense, now they better at it. All that probably pales in comparison to what your team has done, right? :ufdup:

You're an idiot. Rams had a complete new offense too. :dead:

This is actually the first year Bradford has had the same coordinator two years in a row. And I don't give a fukk about the Redskins, I said how the trade worked for MY team. And the Rams had the #14 defense, so really ... you can stop talking out of your ass with your horrid opinions.
 

PS5 Pro

DC looking a 1/2 seed right about nuh
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Messages
32,400
Reputation
-10,636
Daps
22,242
Reppin
The Original Rec Room Gang
You're an idiot. Rams had a complete new offense too. :dead:

This is actually the first year Bradford has had the same coordinator two years in a row. And I don't give a fukk about the Redskins, I said how the trade worked for MY team. And the Rams had the #14 defense, so really ... you can stop talking out of your ass with your horrid opinions.
Here's the difference. One team goes on to win its division and lose in the playoffs after having a 14-0 lead when its star QB loses a leg, thus the season

While your team can say "we beat this team, we tied this other team, but we lost the rest of the games :to:"
Teams don't get excited when watching film on the rams, they can not watch film and win
Vs the Redskins, they take two weeks to study. Its a high impact offense that is the talk of the league
Changing the way offense in this league is done. Thats what you are up against in this comparison. You said you'd take Bradford which is an extremely UNPOPULAR choice and you know this. So why call me an idiot?
You sound like the idiot. You are the idiot. And I do believe that fanbases take on the characteristics of its team
Your team gave away the best QB to ever play the game so it can get so bum you named that I don't give a shyt about.
Your team isn't in the same league as the Redskins, you know this. And if you wanna say you beat us?
We beat the Ravens last year
We beat the Giants the year before then (swept them)
We beat the Packers the year before that (we had McNabb then too)
We beat whoever wont the title the year before them as well

Did that make us elite? Only in my mind :manny:
But now? I KNOW the world recognizes what the Redskins are all about. They still hatin, but they gonna act like they knew it all along by week 4. Don't say shyt nikka, just walk outta this thread with your head hung in shame
 

Spade

Superstar
Joined
Sep 14, 2012
Messages
14,495
Reputation
935
Daps
25,796
Reppin
DC/Texas/Chicago
I don't give a fukk what you factored in, what you DIDN'T factor in is how the Redskins went 7-0 down the stretch and its defense was top 5 in the league during that span :whew:
You also didn't factor in that you still would of lost last year if Josh Morgan didn't get that unsportmanlike penalty, or if Pierre Garcon was playing. Or the fact we improved as well all over, B.Orakpo got injured early in that game too.
We got new players, we got old players back like Roy Helu who was injured last year as well. Bruh, you literally didn't factor in a single thing about the Redskins It was a new offense, now they better at it. All that probably pales in comparison to what your team has done, right? :ufdup:

First off, why are you overrating the fukk outta your sorry ass squad. Your team sucks, REAL BAD.
You rode AD to the playoffs, your team didn't do shyt really. You would win games 33 to 32. You wasn't impressive.
Naming a bunch of over the hill receivers who haven't been shyt in years or ever isn't special. I love Chris Cooley, he was a pro bowler too. But most ppl think he sucks. Most ppl don't even know who your TE is like that. Struggle market :manny:
You played DC, you lost. I'm sorry but you just gonna have to deal with it :umad:

Bruh, you really embarrassing yourself out here. Like nobody seen you go back to 93. You so furious you playing not dumb, but retarded. I just said I know it was less than 20, more like 19 1/2. It was 17, you won a single playoff game in the last 17yrs :wow: How bout dem cowboys!! :blessed:
Still wrong. We won in 96 and won one in 09. Don't you ever get tired of this. You are 0/3. Don't try to save your self by now saying less than because even if you said less than, you'd still be wrong.
 

jfkennedy

Best After Bobby
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
11,444
Reputation
1,121
Daps
18,739
Here's the difference. One team goes on to win its division and lose in the playoffs after having a 14-0 lead when its star QB loses a leg, thus the season

While your team can say "we beat this team, we tied this other team, but we lost the rest of the games :to:"
Teams don't get excited when watching film on the rams, they can not watch film and win
Vs the Redskins, they take two weeks to study. Its a high impact offense that is the talk of the league
Changing the way offense in this league is done. Thats what you are up against in this comparison. You said you'd take Bradford which is an extremely UNPOPULAR choice and you know this. So why call me an idiot?
You sound like the idiot. You are the idiot. And I do believe that fanbases take on the characteristics of its team
Your team gave away the best QB to ever play the game so it can get so bum you named that I don't give a shyt about.
Your team isn't in the same league as the Redskins, you know this. And if you wanna say you beat us?
We beat the Ravens last year
We beat the Giants the year before then (swept them)
We beat the Packers the year before that (we had McNabb then too)
We beat whoever wont the title the year before them as well

Did that make us elite? Only in my mind :manny:
But now? I KNOW the world recognizes what the Redskins are all about. They still hatin, but they gonna act like they knew it all along by week 4. Don't say shyt nikka, just walk outta this thread with your head hung in shame

Best qb to ever play. Lol.

:russ:

:heh:

:dead:
 

PS5 Pro

DC looking a 1/2 seed right about nuh
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Messages
32,400
Reputation
-10,636
Daps
22,242
Reppin
The Original Rec Room Gang
Still wrong. We won in 96 and won one in 09. Don't you ever get tired of this. You are 0/3. Don't try to save your self by now saying less than because even if you said less than, you'd still be wrong.
They do say everything is bigger in texas, even the idiots :snoop:
Lets do a sesame street type count from the year 1997 to 2013
97(1)
98(2)
99(3)
00(4)
01(5)
02(6)
03(7)
04(8)
05(9)
06(10)
07(11)
08(12)
09(13)
10(14)
11(15)
(12(16)
13(17)

To my calculations, thats 17yrs. Now I know, I know. This year is 2013, what if the cowboys make it and win a playoff game this year? Well, it would still be 17yrs between wins :leon:
But let me put the icing on top. Since you know it all, you would then know that you are either dumb or lying your dumbass uh... ass off :ufdup: The cowbroads last playoff win (before 09) was 96, not the 97 season. So the real drought is 18yrs
Wow, you was wrong again and exposed as a butthurt hater trying to argue over trivial bullshyt. The point is your team is atrocious. This ether right here is lifelong buddy

:russ: @ Rob feeling like he had to console a nikka :laff: He was like "Tony, I seen how soft you are in the news. Man, don't let all those ints get you down bruh" like if he was the vet :whew:
Best qb to ever play. Lol.

:russ:

:heh:

:dead:
:yeshrug:
 

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
46,910
Reputation
4,756
Daps
104,333
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
Philly aint making the 'offs either

tumblr_ltic12yf5f1qeqn2z.gif


Striaght up...I love my Iggles but our defense is going to be trash this season. We'd have to score 40 points a game every game to make the playoffs with how porous I predict our D is going to be.

Dude relax. Our Defense will be fine. They will get better as the season progress and that Dline looks scary as shyt which will help the secondary greatly.
 

Spade

Superstar
Joined
Sep 14, 2012
Messages
14,495
Reputation
935
Daps
25,796
Reppin
DC/Texas/Chicago
They do say everything is bigger in texas, even the idiots :snoop:
Lets do a sesame street type count from the year 1997 to 2013
97(1)
98(2)
99(3)
00(4)
01(5)
02(6)
03(7)
04(8)
05(9)
06(10)
07(11)
08(12)
09(13)
10(14)
11(15)
(12(16)
13(17)

To my calculations, thats 17yrs. Now I know, I know. This year is 2013, what if the cowboys make it and win a playoff game this year? Well, it would still be 17yrs between wins :leon:
But let me put the icing on top. Since you know it all, you would then know that you are either dumb or lying your dumbass uh... ass off :ufdup: The cowbroads last playoff win (before 09) was 96, not the 97 season. So the real drought is 18yrs
Wow, you was wrong again and exposed as a butthurt hater trying to argue over trivial bullshyt. The point is your team is atrocious. This ether right here is lifelong buddy

:russ: @ Rob feeling like he had to console a nikka :laff: He was like "Tony, I seen how soft you are in the news. Man, don't let all those ints get you down bruh" like if he was the vet :whew:

:yeshrug:

When you counted 97, you actually counted from 96. As actually, the 2013 season is the 17th year after the 1996 season. So by your calculations, you're still wrong. Try to use your brain for once.
 

PS5 Pro

DC looking a 1/2 seed right about nuh
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Messages
32,400
Reputation
-10,636
Daps
22,242
Reppin
The Original Rec Room Gang
When you counted 97, you actually counted from 96. As actually, the 2013 season is the 17th year after the 1996 season. So by your calculations, you're still wrong. Try to use your brain for once.
:snoop: The 1997 season would be 1st year after the 1996 season, correct?
I did my sesame street styled countdown so that people wouldn't be confused.
:damn: you Texas, everything is bigger. Even the losses :ooh:
 
Top