ex-NYC mayor,running for POTUS cops pleas for STOP N FRISK

[get these nets]

that spoiler though

Spoiler

from 2013...I don't forget ANYTHING.......

Judged ruled Stop and Frisk unconstitutional, (then) mayor Bloomberg appealed the decision

 

[BeeCityRoller]

An apology because you're running for President now? ADOS cut the check

 

[ORDER_66]

Nah, nah you KNEW what your white ass was doing to us here in NYC now that we coming at everyoneß knecks you wanna cop pleas... FOH!!! I didn't vote for you then and I damned sure ain't voting for you now!!! Take ya rich ass and sit down

 

[Actually6Foot3]

Eat a dikk Bloomberg.

NYPD and the PBA can eat a dikk too

 

[Ethnic Vagina Finder]

Obviously, the black vote isn't important in the general election (unless we all decide to vote independent or republican), but in the primaries, it does in certain states.

 

[Jean toomer]

the man has absolutely no shame or decency.

 

[Unknown Poster]

fukk Bloomberg and fukk Giuliani.

 

[get these nets]

Crime went down during Bloomberg's terms...........and CONTINUED to go down after Stop n Frisk was stopped/reduced as policy under Mayor Deblasio.
The fact that it continued to go down points to the effectiveness of other measures in crime reduction. NYC has record low crime numbers now.

Had reported street crimes spiked up after Stop N Frisk stopped, Bloomberg would have used it as a "tough on crime" badge, but it didn't so now he's trying to cop pleas

I come from a no nonsense father, and I hate crime and criminals more than anybody(trust me), but being smart on crime is more effective than being "tough on crime".

=============
For those outside of NYC metro area, this ad and his stated opposition to S&F is what helped Deblasio get elected
(if this ad is new to you.............wait........ for............ it)

 

[get these nets]

Obviously, the black vote isn't important in the general election (unless we all decide to vote independent or republican), but in the primaries, it does in certain states.

copping this plea is for more than the Black vote, it's for progressive voters also.

 

[Let A Fro Be A Fro]

He went from pleasing cops to copping pleas.

In the ridiculously unlikely chance that he's elected, I'm sure he'll return to the former

 

[TL15]

I’d have more respect for him if he took a stance that said “my goal was to protect black and brown people” even with an

But flat out lying and taking a complete 180


By the way it’s always Bloomberg

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

Looks like I need a follow up pseudonym op-ed piece on all his bullshyt double downing and the research which shows the ineffectiveness of ‘Stop and Frisk” as copped to by various independent sources including the wrong biased details and fallacies of the New York Times which caused them to retract their original stance on stop/frisk illegal searches in the first place. NYPD and Bloomfag are up to their propaganda antics again.

Opinion | Injustices of Stop and Frisk

Opinion | Moving Beyond Stop-and-Frisk

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

Judge Scheindlin has thus confirmed what many of us suspected all along. A large number of these stops and frisks failed to satisfy the minimal constitutional requirements that the Supreme Court put in place with its decision in Terry v. Ohio in 1968: for a stop, reasonable and articulable suspicion that a person is engaged in a crime, and for a frisk, reasonable and articulable suspicion that a person is armed and dangerous.

Even more important, Judge Scheindlin found that many stops were based almost entirely on race, in violation of the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law, and that the city has long responded with deliberate indifference.

 

[Anerdyblackguy]

fukk out here fakkit. That stop & frisk was absolutely dehumanizing towards black people.



And don’t think we forgot about school chancellor Cathleen black either.

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

Now he thinks he’s above the law now, as usual.
In Floyd v. City of New York, decided on August 12, 2013, US District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin ruled that stop and frisk had been used in an unconstitutional manner and directed the police to adopt a written policy to specify where such stops are authorized.

Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, a police officer may stop a suspect on the street and frisk him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous.
- Of course, one wouldn’t know that listening to Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and other true believers, who insist that aggressive stop-and-frisks have reduced violent crime. But they’re wrong.

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)