Because comittment mattersthen why even propose 10 years in advance in the first place: bryan:
Wait the 10 years, if ol girl is still around and you've finally come to the realization that the risk of financial rape is now mitigated/non existant (), and you want to spend the rest of your life with her, then proceed

I agree. 25 years would be ideal. Since it's a lifelong comittment, but 10 sounds best.
I could easily say that a 10 year engagement is intense relationship training to insure a successful marriage. The same way that the decision to get married was made well before that![]()



That's all I'm saying. What's wrong with knowing someone 100%?Seeing as how most women file for divorce and are quick to terminate the lifelong contract
They should have to prove they are down to go the distance
Make em wait 10 years

Manic Prophet said:It seems a lot of people don't really seem to understand the idea of a marriage.
I don't think I'm retarded
This is how I know you're retarded.
Most of us will die before 80, yet you're advocating for spending almost a third of your life to make a decision. It doesn't take anywhere near that long to make any life decisions, but it should take that long to pick a marriage partner?
And if you change your mind in yr 20, you took a quarter of your life to think and make a decision.
lol at an engagement of at least 10 years being analogous to undergrad/med school training. Where every year has its own challenges. What is the difference in yr 2 of engagement compared to yr 4? Or yr 9?![]()



:smugcud:Flawless![]()

It seems a lot of people don't really seem to understand the idea of a marriage.
The main purpose of a marriage, sans religion and romance, is to establish an estate, family unit, and partnership between two romantic partners.
That means, you are trusting your SO to enter into a sort of business agreement. You are trusting them with legal matters, financial matters, management matters, and all sorts of other powers.
It's a whole lot more serious than "You don't love me enough to commit".
You don't get married just because you love someone, brehs and brehettes.
Ziggiy said:Flawless![]()
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited said:You won't just marry her, she'll marry you, too.
It seems a lot of people don't really seem to understand the idea of a marriage.
The main purpose of a marriage, sans religion and romance, is to establish an estate, family unit, and partnership between two romantic partners.
That means, you are trusting your SO to enter into a sort of business agreement. You are trusting them with legal matters, financial matters, management matters, and all sorts of other powers.
It's a whole lot more serious than "You don't love me enough to commit".
You don't get married just because you love someone, brehs and brehettes.
The challenge is to see if the woman breaks under the pressure of the perception her friends and family have for her
This is how I know you're retarded.
Most of us will die before 80, yet you're advocating for spending almost a third of your life to make a decision. It doesn't take anywhere near that long to make any life decisions, but it should take that long to pick a marriage partner?
And if you change your mind in yr 20, you took a quarter of your life to think and make a decision.
lol at an engagement of at least 10 years being analogous to undergrad/med school training. Where every year has its own challenges. What is the difference in yr 2 of engagement compared to yr 4? Or yr 9?![]()
It seems a lot of people don't really seem to understand the idea of a marriage.
The main purpose of a marriage, sans religion and romance, is to establish an estate, family unit, and partnership between two romantic partners.
That means, you are trusting your SO to enter into a sort of business agreement. You are trusting them with legal matters, financial matters, management matters, and all sorts of other powers.
It's a whole lot more serious than "You don't love me enough to commit".
You don't get married just because you love someone, brehs and brehettes.
I don't think I'm retarded
and obviously the 25 years was just a play on you bringing it up in the first place
But, i don't see anything wrong with a 10+ year engagement. At all. I mean you're spending time with the person anyway, and the person is more important than the marriage.
If you were to spend 25 years engaged, would it really be that different if you were in a loving relationship the entire time?
Y'all need the government issued piece of a paper to prove your love to someone?![]()
An engagement is a comittment. People "date" and cheat all of the time. People have girlfriends and boyfriends that they don't comitt to. If you have a fiancé, then you are saying "This will be my life partner". There is no "hold up" the same way there is no "rush", it's marriage not a subscription. You aren't "sitting" on an engagement, and you're not playing the field, you're just making sure everything is right.And I agree with that concept completely, as a matter of fact I said the same damn shyt in the thread about the man who's wife left him after he started to go blind due to diabetes.
So an engagement, a betrothal, is basically the first step. You think that person is worthy enough of marriage, then what's the hold up? Are you still questioning getting into that contract with them? If you propose to a woman and she accepts your proposal, then naturally the next step is to plan the wedding. The hell you just sitting on an engagement for?