@ExNat did you lie to get @Poitier banned? If so, why?

[Akata Man Bromo]

 

[Capo Dei Capi]

how did they protect the innocent tho? or did they just protect @ExNat from the same backlash @Poitier received?


and i didn't see this concern for hostility when people were actively plotting to ruin his offline personal life over this....we gotta keep it funky both ways, if @Poitier really did all of that with no provocation or just cause, he deserves to be banned for however long he's banned...but if we're only seeing 50% of the facts and story, is that really enough to convict?

She's the only innocent one. I tagged her in the @Poitier banned appreciation thread and she PM'd me this.

I had to talk the rest out of her because she didn't want to be involved. You're not stupid breh you know what wshappening, @Poitier was looking to expose her pics to the board or make a thread bragging that he stole my 'girl'. If you do that you're invitng the fukkery back on to yourself. My nikka @ScoopNScore said it best when @backierobinson was doing this shyt nobody defended him I don't see why this case is any different. I know there are more females @poitierhas harassed who didn't wish to come forward and sadly with reactions like this they never may

Maybe that part was going too far but I didn't suggest it.

Look, be serious. Im not talking about a simple ban. Your thread title and post put it all a certain way, and you know the wolves. Ole' go for the throat ass nikkas that can possibly do something worse than neg or call for a ban. We weren't talking about a troll. We weren't talking about a general shytty poster. We were talking about allegations of a sexually predatory nature. And blackmail. And hacking other peoples PC. Some serious shyt that can slide from online to real life. Meanwhile if it was JUST left up to the mods, it would have been over and done with.

You made the thread, breh. They only asking that when you have to smoking gun, you make that shyt exhibit A.

No because I don't take this place serious. This is coli fukkery you sound like you've gone soft nikkas sent pics to a posters wife from here before so miss me with all that

 

[At30wecashout]

If there was ever a coli "meet n greet",... judging by the hate and fukkery perpetrated by posters in the past year... I must say there would definitely be some furniture moving up in there

No, maybe a few keyboards. The internet is letting people get real clique-like.

 

[trick]

I have the unedited PM's but won't post them while the board is acting so hostile. @ExNat didn't even attempt to get @Poitier banned. She was worried he would attempt to hack her. You are all reading too deep into this

people are worried about time-stamps and all that, but i'm sure @cook and/or @Brooklynzson read the original pm's and if they wanted to, they can probably access their inboxes and read their pm's as well.

 

[CEITEDMOFO]

I know Tnt weren't saying that, but it was made as a tag. That thread initiated it as did the OP. He perpetuated these doctored screenshots just to ruin Poitier's reputation and cause people to cape for ExNat because she was "terrified." Someone tagged BOTH his school and his focus of study because of this. That's REAL LIFE not some forum drama.

that Is messed up

 

[skeetsinternal]

 

[ManxOfxThexYear]

people are worried about time-stamps and all that, but i'm sure @cook and/or @Brooklynzson read the original pm's and if they wanted to, they can probably access their inboxes and read their pm's as well.

They can but they already said multiple times, Banned accounts are between them and the person banned not for everyone else to read. Their board they make the rules, they felt he was out of place so be it. So all of this let him be free mess, doesn't matter.

for all we know, they could of read everything he's done and know both sides and made the decision based off that.

 

[Raava]

Despite if he argues with whomever, or does whatever on an internet forum he shouldn't be tarnished and labeled a rapist and have his private information tagged.
I don't care if he's banned or not, I just think it's foul to loosely call a man a rapist and try to ruin his reputation when he wasn't given a fair chance to speak, no were the real screenshots ever shared. Even if it wasn't Poitier or a poster that was rude to me I would defend this.

I agree about his personal life and info that's too far and wrong.

I just cringed at the capping by your in both threads because you don't know. Things like this aren't new here ppl pop off when a poster gets banned and tbh some of the ppl capping could really care less. Its all for the drama. At the end of the day fair is fair and it would be horrible to ruin his personal life over a forum and false info. That's not all you were talking about though.

 

[Capo Dei Capi]

So he sent 84 PMs asking for pictures/nudes? She was bothered but kept communicating with him, sometimes initiating the contact? And instead of contacting the staff about the issue she continues to engage him?

Can we keep the 's to minimum breh?

Lol you don't even know his reputation though.


I would like the truth too but please. The truth is that he stalks and harasses female posters or has in the past (not threatened to hack tho) Also the truth is that he was so nice to you because 1.you aren't black and 2. You were arguing with another female poster he hates.

I stand by what I said in the original thread, that he is repressed, but true if its doctored then its not fair but I'm not mad he is gone and I'll say the same when he gets back

This

people are worried about time-stamps and all that, but i'm sure @cook and/or @Brooklynzson read the original pm's and if they wanted to, they can probably access their inboxes and read their pm's as well.

and this

 

[At30wecashout]

no because I don't take this place serious. This is coli fukkery you sound like you've gone soft nikkas sent pics to a posters wife from here before so miss me with all that

I understand that. The point im trying to convey, to no avail apparently, is that in the case of calling people unsavory shyt, that should not be taken lightly. People share information about themselves on this site, pictures and shyt, and when YOU make a thread asking if the guy is good or bad and should he stay banned, while you are just fukking around, some other people have real feelings about that. Im no internet detective but with the information dropped in that thread I could find out that guys shyt within an hour.

Im not blaming you for anything, im saying everyone has a right to question the shyt based on the fact that
A: You made it public with that thread
and
B: He doesn't even get to rebut.
Just because other people swam in shyt doesn't mean you have to. All it takes is a name and a picture and people can walk into work or go visit fam and have some shyt said on a message board relayed to them from a third party.

 

[J-Nice]

This internet shyt is gettin too real out here man

 

[trick]

They can but they already said multiple times, Banned accounts are between them and the person banned not for everyone else to read. Their board they make the rules, they felt he was out of place so be it. So all of this let him be free mess, doesn't matter.

Agreed, there's no need to be upset over this. He might be back here at some point anyway with another user name

 

[Rarely-Wrong Liggins]

Can we keep the 's to minimum breh?

You do know that seven times twelve is 84 right? No because I gleaned all of that from the PM she sent you. Unless you're saying she's lying?

 

[AJtheOne]

big girl got them hands

 

[GetInTheTruck]

I didn't agree with a lot of what @Poitier had to say but overall he was a good poster, I didn't even know he was banned. And ruining someones personal life? e-beef is never that serious