I'm going to sit this one out until we get the details. Hopefully this will spare me the false flag, CIA, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Alex Jones, Brexit, and other turns this thread takes.
I mean come on.No, why should I?
Are those attacks "in the name of Jesus?"
Well yes. This is the point I've continued to make.Well yeah, but their argument is attacks on Muslim countries is an attack on Islam.
C'mon breh. You know what time this is.I'm going to sit this one out until we get the details. Hopefully this will spare me the false flag, CIA, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Alex Jones, Brexit, and other turns this thread takes.
Does your phone/computer not have spell-check

It's pretty much a metastatic cancer at this point.Well yes. This is the point I've continued to make.
This is not limited to terrorism of the 90s whereby you had specific nationalities, ethnicities, or geographies.
This is SOLELY any muslim at this point.
Does your phone/computer not have spell-check![]()

Not great.answer the question...how is Libya after Hilary breh ?![]()
No, why should I?
Are those attacks "in the name of Jesus?"
So you are okay with the US and France invading Libya and taking out the leader by arming wahabbist extremist, all for the leader having the audacity to say they are planning on selling oil in gold and leaving the US standard?Not great.
And?
I don't know this world you live in, where every action is easily predictable and foreseeably tidy.
No, why should I?
Are those attacks "in the name of Jesus?"
Lemme guess, not all muslims, religion of peace, be tolerant blah blah blahThis is the clown some of you begged to be brought back.


