Exxon Knew, Exxon Lied, Millions Will Die....

[Ezekiel 25:17]

So agriculture is less than transportation. By the way, I hope you realise that the greenhouse gases from petrol stick around longer than the greenhouse gases from agriculture.

Why the you bring up agriculture? What about all the burning coal for electricity that's a close second? What about electric cars that requires....you know...electricity to recharge??What you gone do with all those used batteries 20 years from now??

We could eliminate all vehicles and that still wouldn't do shyt. That's my original post said we have to change our mindset towards EVERYTHING. But no, you come out the woodwork with the name calling

 

[Astroslik]

@Astroslik is your name related to Ruben slikkk by any chance.

Yup

You a metro zu fan?

 

[Uitomy]

If we weren't so materialistic and didn't need an unending excess of everything (food, clothes, cars, housing) we'd be a bit better off. But the earth going through a cycle of getting hot as fukk, thousands of years later if we're still here we'll be complaining about humans causing global freezing like it wasn't going to happen anyway

 

[MischievousMonkey]

Doesn't really say anything if it's not taking into account the interconnections between the different sectors. For example, how much of the transportation share can be directly or indirectly tied to agriculture (food transportation)? It will be attributed to transport but it's a direct consequence of agriculture.

 

[QuintessentialMan]

Different areas/societies will face different challenges.

Some more than others. Canada and hopefully western europe and the USA should be completely f***ed though and thats justice. They'll get flooded to shyt and the heat will be unbearable. Societies will collaps because the so called middle class wont be able to deal with the scarcity of resources the 1% will hoard.
Asia and Africa you would think the worst but migration aside a lot of people who are here are already used to harsh times and scarce resources anyway. Most people in Africa already depend on themselves for clean water,power,etc because govts are substandard so they are set to be more equipped to find a way to survive than say people that have been living in nanny states that just been handed shyt for decades.

Which countries are most threatened by and vulnerable to climate change?

 

[Ya Sinning Mane]

Yup

You a metro zu fan?

hell yeah I fukk wit all that shyt.

I seen your name and knew it wasn't by coincidence

 

[Micky Mikey]

If we weren't so materialistic and didn't need an unending excess of everything (food, clothes, cars, housing) we'd be a bit better off. But the earth going through a cycle of getting hot as fukk, thousands of years later if we're still here we'll be complaining about humans causing global freezing like it wasn't going to happen anyway

The Global Warming occuring currently is 100% the cause of human activity. Earth goes through natural cycles which occur over the course of thousands of years. This time the change is happening over the course of a single human lifetime. There is a direct link between the rate of warming and the amount of CO2 emissions we've emitted since the industrial revolution.

 

[MischievousMonkey]

I didn't want to be hyperbolic but you're right, billions will be affected. I think the best place in the US will be the Great Lakes.

I think its a wrap for SubSaharan Africa. Parts of Africa are going to become uninhabitable. It is currently has some of the fastest growing populations as well. It will be interesting to see how things play out. Unfortunately I think many African countries will become failed states due to food insecurity and water scarcity. There will be a massive exodus out of these regions and into Europe (which will dealing with its own problems).

IPCC AR6-WGI Atlas

For the projection based on the CMIP6. Seems like the Sahel is going to go through it, but other parts of the continent will either be straight in terms of rain or have a huge (I mean bigger than now) flood problem.

IPCC AR6-WGI Atlas

Temperature is going to be bad, edit: but maybe not so much relatively to what's already there? IPCC AR6-WGI Atlas

 

[Umoja]

Why the you bring up agriculture? What about all the burning coal for electricity that's a close second? What about electric cars that requires....you know...electricity to recharge??What you gone do with all those used batteries 20 years from now??

We could eliminate all vehicles and that still wouldn't do shyt. That's my original post said we have to change our mindset towards EVERYTHING. But no, you come out the woodwork with the name calling

Agriculture is what you brought up when pressed, you retard.

You grasped at "Electric cars rely on electricity which burns fossil fuels" and someone pointed out to you that it is about efficiency over time. Petrol cars will always emitt carbon dioxide. However there are steps in place to make the production of electricity more eco friendly e.g. nuclear energy.

This boils down to you trying to juelz your way out of thinking it is acceptable to damage the environment because your want to hear your loud engine running.

 

[Uitomy]

The Global Warming occuring currently is 100% the cause of human activity. Earth goes through natural cycles which occur over the course of thousands of years. This time the change is happening over the course of a single human lifetime. There is a direct link between the rate of warming and the amount of CO2 emissions we've emitted since the industrial revolution.

Then the earth will adapt and burn us out, then go back to buisness as usual

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

Doesn't really say anything if it's not taking into account the interconnections between the different sectors. For example, how much of the transportation share can be directly or indirectly tied to agriculture (food transportation)? It will be attributed to transport but it's a direct consequence of agriculture.

Agriculture needs transportation. Without transportation we wouldn't have food.

Regardless we need to change a lot. People keep hollering about automobiles when the electricity we use from burning coal is a very close second.

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

Agriculture is what you brought up when pressed, you retard.

You grasped at "Electric cars rely on electricity which burns fossil fuels" and someone pointed out to you that it is about efficiency over time. Petrol cars will always emitt carbon dioxide. However there are steps in place to make the production of electricity more eco friendly e.g. nuclear energy.

This boils down to you trying to juelz your way out of thinking it is acceptable to damage the environment because your want to hear your loud engine running.

I didn't bring up agriculture in either of my 1st two posts at all. Where did I say that?

Why do you keep bringing up automobiles when my post clearly said we have to change our mindset Everything?

 

[MischievousMonkey]

Agriculture needs transportation. Without transportation we wouldn't have food.

Regardless we need to change a lot. People keep hollering about automobiles when the electricity we use from burning coal is a very close second.

Yeah, that's what I'm saying. If we were producing less meat, both the agriculture and transport shares would be reduced.

 

[KyokushinKarateMan]

its over

You ain’t @Big Boss

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

Yeah, that's what I'm saying. If we were producing less meat, both the agriculture and transport shares would be reduced.

Agreed. We should also do our own individual gardens. Imagine if something like 30% of u.s. citizens had their own garden. I might low-key do this when I get a house. Bunch of herbs and some vegetables

As I said prior, it really starts from leadership. We value material possessions over a simple clean life.