Fair or Foul: Artists Must Agree To Never Slander Puff Again To Get Publishing According to NDA Given Out

Razzay

Pro
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
2,549
Reputation
-222
Daps
2,338
Reppin
NULL
It’s obvious that with the massive NDA to all your ex artists, Puff is gearing up to do something big regarding the bad boy name and history. I could see a bad boy miniseries or movie coming soon that they won’t be able to comment on how they’re portrayed. We just watched puff’s son literally try to be mase and the fans are saying more about it that than the real one.

Puff planning to start taking liberties ridiculously.
biopic and similar to the wu tang series
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
55,225
Reputation
21,244
Daps
302,468
Puffy been a snake since day one so it's not surprising that even when he seemingly does the "right" thing there's a catch. Most of that publishing earnings potential is already gone, of course. But at least the artists have it now.
 

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
10,536
Reputation
1,938
Daps
18,579
Her voice is outrageously annoying. Nobody, and I mean nobody naturally speaks like that. That valley girl shyt comes from years and years of being intentionally obnoxious until it becomes second nature.. And they should be shamed for it
I looked at her, saw her grievance and knew there’d be nothing I’d get from hearing her speak and then I saw your comment


This is an intentional ‘vocal fry’ she’s basically consciously or unconsciously varying the amount of wind she puts behind her speech

I doubt her publishing is worth anything so she should probably just speak her mind if she thinks that’s advantageous to her :manny:
 

Razzay

Pro
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
2,549
Reputation
-222
Daps
2,338
Reppin
NULL
For the music industry and puff's move to do this should be respected as the first domino to drop, this will be a game changer to how deals are structured now, puff should get credit for that influence
 

REdefinition

Superstar
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
9,059
Reputation
3,453
Daps
60,830
Reppin
NULL
Yeah, I'm siding with Puff on this one. For one, it's not "their" publishing, it's his. He owns it legally and that was mutually agreed upon at the time his artists signed their deals. Puff has no obligation to give them shyt. Why would I voluntarily relinquish one of my financial assets just for the artists to take my $ and continue to slander me publicly. I would want some protection there. Just like they didn't have to sell their publishing to begin with, they don't have to accept this offer either.
 

Razzay

Pro
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
2,549
Reputation
-222
Daps
2,338
Reppin
NULL
Yeah, I'm siding with Puff on this one. For one, it's not "their" publishing, it's his. He owns it legally and that was mutually agreed upon at the time his artists signed their deals. Puff has no obligation to give them shyt. Why would I voluntarily relinquish one of my financial assets just for the artists to take my $ and continue to slander me publicly. I would want some protection there. Just like they didn't have to sell their publishing to begin with, they don't have to accept this offer either.
ding ding ding winning comment
 

maxamusa

Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
30,094
Reputation
8,562
Daps
77,168
Reppin
Old York
Puffy been a snake since day one so it's not surprising that even when he seemingly does the "right" thing there's a catch. Most of that publishing earnings potential is already gone, of course. But at least the artists have it now.


why do u feel he a snake?
 
Top