See there you go. Adding context and discussing what actually happened is alot different from responding to "the eagles need to run well" with "we shut down the greatest running back ever. No one can run on usI'm not being dishonest. 43 yards is 43 yards dude. We took him out the game. Yes, the turnovers definitely helped and we didn't hold him to 0.3 yards on 40 carries or some shyt. That's not what I'm saying. But our defensive gameplan was to make Goff beat us and not let Gurley get off and that's exactly what we executed.
If the Cavs game planned to take Curry out the game and he had 8 points on 3-4 shooting going into the 4th, then that's what they did, 75% shooting percentage be damned. Apples to oranges, but same shyt.
"At the end of the day the Falcons did what they have done all year on the road and gave up 110+ yards rushing.
I expect the eagles to get 1st downs and average a high ypa on the ground like all the worse rushing teams do against Atlanta when they're on the road





). We're gonna stack the box and make Foles beat us just like we did Goff. Matt is outplaying Foles no matter what, the question is by how much. If Foles gives him a run for his money then y'all got the advantage. If he doesn't, then we'll win going away. Should be a good game regardless 



