Even dumber is you not acknowledging that a vast majority aren't going to research information in the format you want it.
The format I want it?

Anyway, you're proving my point. Most people will not research information, which is why guys like these two clowns are so insidious. They are purposely spreading falsehoods, and muddying up the waters of discourse on topics of CRUCIAL importance--history, biology, anthropology, sociology, race, politics, economics--in search of celebrity and financial gain. It is amazing to me how so many otherwise fairly intelligent posters give this blatant, unabashed charlatanry a pass.
@Napoleon will type in size 64 font red all caps that someone is a fukking stupid moronic piece of shyt if they misinterpret something about the teleological argument for the existence of God, but vehemently stan a dude who says melanin has mystical qualities. They're not even being low key with their pursuit of and marketing themselves as celebrities. They're like rappers trying to blow up.
You keep saying we should just ignore the nonsense they say and focus on getting something out of the positive parts, and the positive will outweigh the negative. I'm not convinced. The coli certainly gives me no reason to believe that. It's about the stanning and cultish mentality they induce more than it is about them. When you got a bunch of dudes making daily threads waiting to see what Tariq Nasheed says about something, copying all his lingo and arguments, being like "OH shyt TARIQ SONNED (WHOEVER)!!!!!" believing Olmecs were black, buying a horribly distorted narrative of what feminism is and shytting on black women, calling everyone who disagrees with any of that shyt a c00n or a cac or a agent of whatever, that ideologically-bunkered mentality is fostering nothing positive for anybody.
Still have yet to see you downplay The Cosmos but I'm sure that comes with caveats.
I don't even know what you're talking about regarding Cosmos. I stopped reading that other thread.