It's not a valid comparison when the premises in the 1st place was to deny the existence of it all together. .
Deny the existence of what altogether? Broke wave didn't deny the existence of increasing police militarization. Some of us have been expressing concern about that for years before Ferguson.
Your argument continues to fail because you are just lumping together various occurrences and facts in a conspiratorial tapestry that for you confirms what you want to believe instead attempting to look at reality objectively.
Listen to yourself.
Fact: Police forces are being increasingly militarized----->
Logical leap #1: This is being done with the clear intent to oppress, enslave, or kill black people specificially----------------------------------------------------------->
Logical leap #2: Tthis is evidence that a pogrom called the King Alfred Plan written by an author in a FICTIONAL book in 1967 is really true.
Let's also point out that the king Alfred plan was not the only "theory" presented that would state making urban areas police states.
lol...it wasn't a "theory" period. It was a plot line in a fictional novel.
Rex84 is a real live document and operation mageddo is another real live federal document stating these same plans.
More conspiratorial confirmation bias nonsense. Rex 84 has nothing to do with the novel The Man Who Cried I Am, which had the King Alfred Plan in the plot. Rex 84 was a classified leak of government contingency plans to declare martial law in a state of emergency. Do you honestly think that there isn't one single government on the planet that doesn't have some version of Rex 84 somewhere? It's alarming, of course. But it has nothing to do with the narrative you're trying to create.
What are you even saying?
"The U. S. government has plans for how to enact martial law if they deemed it necessary, so therefore a plot to eliminate black people from the face of the Earth stated in a 1967 fictional novel is really true."
That actually makes logical sense inside your brain?
It's not evangelical to point out the correlations and similarities. It's common sense that does that.
His entire point of the evangelical end of times analogy was that correlation does NOT equal causation. You still don't get it. Just because black people get oppressed in society, and have been mostly grist for the capitalist mill since day one in America, that doesn't mean some random plot line from a novel about a plan to exterminate black people is true.
The point is Tariq Nasheed LIED to you. The King Alfred Plan was just some shyt out of a novel. Regardless of whatever real world similarities, real or imagined, he didn't say it was from a novel. He didn't even say the name of the novel and the author. He just said the King Alfred Plan is real. It doesn't bother you in the slightest that someone who presents them self as a learned educator disseminating truth is telling you straight up lies? That doesn't make you question their true motives and integrity? You let motherfukkers with their hand out asking for money lie to you and just say, "Well what he meant was this..."?
Honestly what's more evangelical is seeing a few flaws in a person teaching and disqualifying them all together. You are at that point saying you only want to listen to perfect scholars who never make a mistake in logic which does not exist. You basically waiting for a Jesus like mythical figure to come deliver the truth to you with no flaws and that is unrealistic.
He didn't make a mistake in logic. He purposely told a lie. The King Alfred Plan is a part of a fictional novel and he presented it as if was some secret truth he uncovered to share with the world. What do you not understand about this?
And no, I don't wait for anybody to deliver truth to me. I search for truth. That's the problem with you Tariq Nasheed acolytes. You dudes are waiting on some hero to come save you. That's why you let these clowns and charlatans lie to you and exploit you, and make excuses for them like a battered wife.
Asking someone not to make shyt up about me is pedantic????
