Farrakhan sounds like Malcolm X

[YBM]

I'm listening to the Malcolm X sppech, the house negro and the field negro and I swear if I didn't know any better I would have though it was Farrakhan. Give it a listen. Anybody else ever notice this?? I'm not talking rhetoric. I'm talkin voice inflection, pauses , everything

 

[Sauanaffe Tustunnagee]

kinda off topic but i always thought the house negro vs field negro debate/comparison was dumb considering both were slaves(the whiteman's bytch) and there is no honor in that..field hand were tapping fo rmassajust like the house nikkas in the big house

 

[No Pulp]

kinda off topic but i always thought the house negro vs field negro debate/comparison was dumb considering both were slaves(the whiteman's bytch) and there is no honor in that..field hand were tapping fo rmassajust like the house nikkas in the big house

Umm... what?

 

[Sauanaffe Tustunnagee]

Umm... what?

whether plowing the field or moping the house a slave is a man whom submits to the will of his oppressor ...instead of trying to identify with the field slave militants whom want to use slavery as a reference point should look up to our ancestors(Nat TurnerJohn Horse,etc) whom rebelled against the institution and refused to die a slave.

 

[KOohbt]

dumb ass he came up under him in the NOI. no shyt he gonna emulate the man.

 

[HoustonTexasCrank]

Wtf is going on here

 

[Apollo Creed]

Malcolm was Farrakhans Mentor.

 

[#1 pick]

They have similarities but not the same

 

[Cabbage Patch]

whether plowing the field or moping the house a slave is a man whom submits to the will of his oppressor ...instead of trying to identify with the field slave militants whom want to use slavery as a reference point should look up to our ancestors(Nat TurnerJohn Horse,etc) whom rebelled against the institution and refused to die a slave.

The point of house Slave versus field Slave is satisfaction with slavery versus dissatisfaction.

Even Nat started as a house Slave. Then he was sold.

Relisten to the speech again, then reread Slave narratives, and you'll get it.

 

[Jean Jacket]

Ok... I see your observation. But, is that your only point?

 

[Sauanaffe Tustunnagee]

The point of house Slave versus field Slave is satisfaction with slavery versus dissatisfaction.

Even Nat started as a house Slave. Then he was sold.

Relisten to the speech again, then reread Slave narratives, and you'll get it.

it's still a dumb analogy considering whether field slaves were satisfied with their situation or not most most still accepted it....maybe so bu once Nat rebelled(kiled his master) he was neither a house nor field slave..it's insulting when these nikkas use a slave as a symbol of black militancylike is said people like John Horse/the Black Seminoles and the Haitian revolutionaries would be a much better reference point to blacks resistance to slavery the new world

 

[No Pulp]

whether plowing the field or moping the house a slave is a man whom submits to the will of his oppressor ...instead of trying to identify with the field slave militants whom want to use slavery as a reference point should look up to our ancestors(Nat TurnerJohn Horse,etc) whom rebelled against the institution and refused to die a slave.

You're missing the point. Yes, both were slaves but the difference between them was contentment; One was satisfied while the other was dissatisfied and most likely rebellious.