What do you say about people searching same areas multiple times (5-9-12 times) and then prostine clothing is found right in the sight in front of everyone. Clear as day. Clothes folded perfectly.
Think critically about what you are saying. Why do people search the same area 5-9-12 times? Because they KNOW that they miss 90% of what might be there. You can be 10 feet off the trail and never be seen if the brush is thick. Missing persons sometimes hide, especially little kids. People with hypothermia try to dig down. Lost people wandering around leave the searched area and double back. There's a lot of reasons to have missed someone in an already-searched area.
What do YOU say about it? The most reasonable explanations are that a missing person was acting weird or a kidnapper/murderer was acting weird. You try to get any other explanation and it makes bigger holes, not smaller ones. (Like why Bigfoot be folding up clothes like that?)
Its actually thousands of examples since the 1850 and he is continually finding more and more all iver the world and went from usa to uk to canada to australia and finds the same UNIQUE clustering around national parks ONLY.
Um, aren't National Parks places with tons of wilderness along with tons of inexperienced hikers? Sounds like the ideal place for people to get lost.
Again, think critically. NP's are popular with inexperienced people, but also remote. Therefore likely for missing persons.
Are NP's special to Bigfoot? Special to UFO's? Special to murderers? None of that would make sense at all.
Hes not going thru nyc missing persons, hes going through missing persons at national parks.
Wait, he's only going through National Parks, then finds unique clustering around National Parks? What a surprise!
And you're still WAY underestimating how many people go missing in these parks. There are books on missing people in Yosemite and the Grand Canyon, and each one alone has had THOUSANDS of missing persons cases. He's still cherry-picking the ones he wants to.
He is ruling out aninal attacks or known human foul play.
He's claiming to rule them out. I already gave an example of him using two cases that the police believe were taken by a known serial killer in the area at the time.
Its not like hes finding 30k missing people at national parks and finding 400 as you say... hes fibding 2000 missing people and finding similar circumstances in 75% of cases. UNKNOWN reasons at that. All known reasons of dissapearance (cat bear drowning etc) arent even considered.
No, there's been 2000 missing people at Yosemite alone. And he's not just taking national parks because he has "The state of Pennsylvania" and other random stuff like that in his clusters (and lies by including two Maryland cases in his Pennsylvania cluster). And to claim they are "similar circumstances" is ridiculous - the connections are vague as hell and are NOT found in 75% of cases except when they're so arbitrary that you'd see them everywhere. I mean, "berries were in the area", in the woods, serious?
This is the opinion of search and reacue officers, fbi, police, surrounding populations...
No it's not. The vast majority of search and rescue officers think it is crock. Of course there are crazy people in every profession who will believe anything.
Why was special forcws brought in to find a boy... alone for a week... no help from search and rescue.
It was a lie that there was no help from search and rescue - if you look online you can see extensive documentation that special forces and search and rescue collaborated completely on the search. Search and rescue were brought in because it was a giant 500,000+ acre park with difficult terrain, there was a special forces base close by, and they needed all the search help they could get. Special forces are expert at looking for people in difficult terrain.
And these kids arent "ranch kids". They are camping vacations...
Then give me an example of a kid who wasn't a ranch kid who walked some unbelievable distance. The example I was given, a 6-year-old boy walking a very believable 18 miles in 15 hours on a clear dirt road, WAS a ranch kid.
What about supposed cougars killing a kid but zero blood found on his clothes. If the animal woulda ttacked the kid (in the movie im not getting dates it seems like you arent really intereste as is) it would have attacked either his neck (no blood found in any of these cases and none on the boys coat) or tore into his belly (no tears whatsoever in his clothes)....
Give me the name so I can research the case. One way for a cougar to kill is to pounce from behind and hit the victim in the head with enough force that it breaks the neck, so there's not necessarily a lot of blood. But then the cougar would feed, of course. However, children's deaths are rarely attributed to cougars, so I'd like to see a name before I believe that that's really what the authorities said.
The top of his skull and a tooth were placed in plain sight 4 years after tye search in an area searched dozens of times.
Why would they have searched the area "dozens of times" if they were so confident that they had already searched it perfectly. USE YOUR CRITICAL THINKING. No one re-searches an area unless they think there's a real chance they might have missed something. Not to mention that the body could have been dumped after the search, or covered in dirt that washed away later, or any number of explanations.
I advise you to read. The thing is the author makes NOOOOO attempt to try and label these situations as supernatural or killers or anything.
Oh, sure, he just sells the books out of his Bigfoot website side-by-side with his Bigfoot books and advertises them on all the paranormal radio shows and websites.
He is an ex cop who is using the same techniquesbthey use to catch serial killers by finding similarities in cases which are out of the norm. It just so happens theres so many mysteries that its almost becoming the norm.
Are those the same techniques by which he proved the existence of Bigfoot?
And he's a disgraced ex-cop who was forced to retire early when he was found to be running a scam and criminal charges were brought. He never did Search and Rescue and I doubt he ever caught a serial killer.
WHY THE fukk WOULDNT THE PARKS SERIVE KEEP A LIST OF MISSING PEOPLE IN PARKS??
USE YOUR CRITICAL THINKING. What the hell would be the possible good for some master list of "all persons missing in all national parks" when the parks effectively are unrelated to each other? Each park keeps it's own list, and if the park is well-managed, those lists are very detailed. You can read entire books about the missing persons cases in Yosemite, or the Grand Canyon, and the authors of those books were able to get extensive information from the parks.
If you watch the movie (123movies) you will see all the names and the parents and entire story 35 miles over 2 days in rough terrain for a 5 yr old is a lot.
I ain't gonna watch the whole movie to get a name. Get me the name so I can do the research if you really want to make a point with it. Nameless stories mean nothing.
....
This black child boy now is dressed as a girl, always.
so hard.