K.O.N.Y
Superstar
that only works with a logical definition.
otherwise it is an ill-defined social-construct of a lineage.
is a jamaican whose people were in america at its foundation in 1700's, then sold south, a foundational black america, more than a black american whose family arrived on the last ship in 1865?
is a liberain who left america in the 1700's an FBA?
do brehs those with 50%+ of gringo heritage owe money to FBA too?
are breh freemen from africa or europe who moved to the states pre 1865 FBA?
in the absence of records, how can these kinds of FBA-ness be proven? Is relative FBA-ness a thing?

its easily one of the best precise ethonyms out there, and easily the best black amercans have ever been designated under
you named extreme examples that exist in the furthest margins. You can do that with any group
is a jamaican whose people were in america at its foundation in 1700's, then sold south, a foundational black america, more than a black american whose family arrived on the last ship in 1865?-
there wouldnt be a "jamaican" with this dynamic, so its a nonsensical outlier
is a liberain who left america in the 1700's an FBA?-
um no. He would stem from a completely different ethno genesis. You can apply this to any post transatlantic ethnic group.
do brehs those with 50%+ of gringo heritage owe money to FBA too
-
um no there isnt "brehs" that owe money. Its the united states government
are breh freemen from africa or europe who moved to the states pre 1865 FBA?
this is an extreme outlier that doesnt exist. And again could be applied to any transatlantic group. But yes that mythical person would be fba
all people who qualify, around 40+ million ppl, can trace their family back to the 1800s,1700s and 1600s
like I said there is no reason for this movement to tie itself to BothSidesing and waving away republicacs evils and yet...
