Feds release scathing report on Chicago police abuse

[Bernie Madoff]

When the police literally conduct themselves as a street gang it kind of hurts the whole protect and serve motto....

 

[ADevilYouKhow]

Shots In The Back, Children Tasered: DOJ Details Excessive Force By Chicago Police

Scum

 

[Dr. Acula]

takes a wolf to catch a wolf

So one case involves police officers shooting a man fleeing in the back and firing upwards of 40 shots. Then they found a gun a mile a way and planted it on the dead man claiming he fired at them.

How do you justify this?

 

[Dr. Acula]

Here is the full report
Justice Department Announces Findings of Investigation into Chicago Police Department
https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/925846/download

 

[Slim]

"Under President Barack Obama, the Justice Department has conducted 25 civil rights investigations of police departments, including those of Cleveland, Baltimore and Seattle, among others."

i'm sure police depts across america are breathing a huge sigh of relief that this tyrannical obama justice dept is coming to end. the nerve of them to look over a police dept's shoulder and check their work. it's not even like they were going to jail, but just the sense that someone was saying "hey, what are you doing?" was enough to anger them. now they can continue killing nikkas and not have to worry about an investigation into their dept policies ... killing with a peace of mind.

Pretty sure Trump supporters in here (HL/TLR) were saying the DOJ under Trump would be no different than under Obama. Argument was black folk have it bad already so everyone is "fear-mongering" over Sessions nomination.

 

[Uncle Hotep]

So one case involves police officers shooting a man fleeing in the back and firing upwards of 40 shots. Then they found a gun a mile a way and planted it on the dead man claiming he fired at them.

How do you justify this?

not justifying it all...you are gonna have bad cops in that sort of environment...thats just being real

 

[Dr. Acula]

not justifying it all...you are gonna have bad cops in that sort of environment...thats just being real

"Takes a wolf to catch a wolf" or something to that effect was just said by you. You obviously were reacting to the report and what was found as a way of saying that the police officers are justified in this case.

Please don't play stupid here. It wasn't a passive observation, you were obviously advocating a specific stance.

Own it or admit you weren't aware of the full extent of what was outlined in the report before a kneejerk reaction. I've been wrong on things or misguided and admitted in. There is no shame in that.

 

[Dr. Acula]

Some anecdotes out of the full report

CPD’s pattern or practice of unreasonable force includes using excessive force against people who do not present a threat and who are suspected only of low-level crimes or, in some cases, no crime at all. For example, officers used a Taser in “drive-stun mode” against a woman in mental health crisis and whose only documented actions were that she failed to follow verbal 6 “Taser” is the brand name of electronic control weapons manufactured by Taser International, Inc. CPD uses Taser brand electronic control weapons and refers to these weapons in their policies and forms as “Tasers.” 33 commands and that she stiffened.7 Officers provided no narrative of the encounter other than to write that the woman was “a high risk mental” who needed to be transported to a hospital for a “mental evaluation.” They noted on the form that the woman was engaged in passive, not active, resistance. This use of force against a woman who was not suspected of any crime was unreasonable and violated CPD policy, which prohibits the use of Tasers against people who only are passively resisting.

In an incident we reviewed, a man died after hitting his head when he fell while fleeing because a CPD officer shot him with a Taser. The man had been suspected only of petty theft from a retail store. IPRA deemed this use of a Taser justified. We saw other unnecessary uses of Tasers against people fleeing after committing minor violations, including a man who was suspected of urinating in public, and a 110-pound-juvenile who fled after officers caught him painting graffiti on a garage. In all of these instances, as in many others we reviewed, the officers articulated no basis to support a conclusion that the convenient but painful and at times dangerous use of Tasers, rather than a less severe use of force, was necessary.

In one case, a man had been walking down a residential street with a friend when officers drove up, shined a light on him, and ordered him to freeze, because he had been fidgeting with his waistband. The man ran. Three officers gave chase and began shooting as they ran. In total, the officers fired 45 rounds, including 28 rifle rounds, toward the man. Several rounds struck the man, killing him. The officers claimed the man fired at them during the pursuit. Officers found 26 no gun on the man. However, officers reported recovering a handgun nearly one block away. The gun recovered in the vicinity, however, was later determined to be fully-loaded and inoperable, and forensic testing determined there was no gunshot residue on the man’s hands. IPRA found the officers’ actions were justified without addressing the efficacy of the pursuit or the number of shots fired. In another case, a CPD officer chased and shot a man. The officer later claimed that during pursuit she ordered the man to stop, at which point the man turned and raised his right arm towards her. According to the officer, the man had pointed a gun at her earlier in the incident and, fearing he was doing so now, she fired. The only gunshot wounds were to the man’s buttocks. No weapon was found on the man, but a gun was found on a nearby roof gutter. IPRA found the shooting justified without accounting for the wounds to the man’s backside.

In another case, a CPD officer chased a man who ran when an officer told him to stop, and then shot the man in the back of the leg. The officer claimed the man had turned to point a gun. After a thorough search of the scene, no gun was recovered. The man, who denied ever turning to face the officer, was found only with a cell phone. In another case, a CPD officer fatally shot a fleeing, unarmed suspect in the back. The officer told investigators the suspect had turned around to point a black object. This account did not square with the location of the shooting victim’s gunshot wounds and appeared contrary to video footage that showed the suspect running away from the officer. Again, IPRA accepted the officer’s account, despite the conflicting evidence. IPRA’s final report of the incident did not mention the existence of the video.

In another case, video evidence showed the tragic end of a foot pursuit of a man who was not a threat when an officer shot him in the back. The officer, who fired 16 shots, killing the man, claimed on his force report that the man was armed and the man “charged [him] with apparent firearm.” The officer shot the man during the foot pursuit, and dashboard-camera footage showed that as the unarmed man lay on the ground, the officer fired three shots into his back. CPD stripped the officer of his police powers after this shooting—his third that year—and the City paid the man’s family $4.1 million in settlem

 

[Dr. Acula]

In another case, an off-duty CPD officer spotted the silhouette of a man in a vacant building and suspected the man was burglarizing it. The officer called 911, but did not wait for other officers to arrive. Instead, the off-duty officer summoned the man out of the building. According to a civilian witness, the burglary suspect angrily exited the building, yelling, “You’re not a fukking cop.” The suspect then advanced on the officer, who struck and kicked the suspect. According to the officer, the suspect then reached into his waistband and withdrew a shiny object, prompting the officer to fire twice, killing the man. No weapon was recovered. Instead, officers reported finding a silver watch near the man’s body. IPRA found the shooting justified without addressing the officer’s failure to await backup. According to press reports, in November 2016, this same officer shot a man in the back and killed him, claiming the man had pointed a gun at him during a foot pursuit. No gun was recovered.

In one incident, officers hit a 16-year-old girl with a baton and then Tasered her after she was asked to leave the school for having a cell phone in violation of school rules. Officers were called in to arrest her for trespassing. Officers claimed the force was justified because she flailed her arms when they tried to arrest her, with no adequate explanation for how such flailing met the criteria for use of a Taser. This was not an isolated incident. We also reviewed incidents in which officers unnecessarily drive-stunned students to break up fights, including one use of a Taser in drive-stun mode against a 14-year-old girl. There was no indication in these files that these students’ conduct warranted use of the Taser instead of a less serious application of force.

In another case, an officer forcibly handcuffed a 12-year-old Latino boy who was outside riding a bike under his father’s supervision. A plainclothes officer, responding to a report of “two male Hispanics running from” the area, detained the boy. According to the boy and his father, the officer approached the boy, ordered him to stop his bike, forcibly handcuffed him, pulled him off his bike, and placed him up against a fence. The boy reported he did not understand the man was a police officer or why he was being detained and told the officer he was only 12. According to the boy, the officer responded that the boy was “old enough to bang,” meaning old enough to engage in gang violence. The boy’s father approached the officer, explained that his son was only 12 years old, and asked what was going on. Records of 911 calls reflect a caller reporting that a plainclothes officer had a 12-year-old in handcuffs and was refusing to say why. The officer placed the boy in the back of a police vehicle before eventually releasing him. The officer’s only apparent basis for this detention was the boy’s race, which is constitutionally unreasonable.

 

[Dr. Acula]

and some more

This report is amazing.

In one incident captured on cell-phone video, an officer breaking up a party approached a man, grabbed him by the shirt, and hit him in the head with a baton. In his reports, the officer, using language very similar to that used in many other reports we reviewed, falsely claimed that the victim had tried to punch him. Before the video surfaced, the officer’s supervisor had approved the use of force and the victim had pled guilty to resisting arrest. The officer has since been relieved of his police powers and is facing criminal charges for his conduct. In another video, a woman exited her car and placed her hands on her vehicle when officers threw her to the ground, hit her, and deployed a Taser against her. The video indicates that the officer’s claim that she had refused to show her hands, thus justifying the force used, was false. Despite the existence of the video, IPRA deemed the force reasona

 

[wire28]

conservative supreme court for the next couple of generations to put an end to this nonsense

 

[hashmander]

conservative supreme court for the next couple of generations to put an end to this nonsense

we were so close breh. just when we thought we had it, they clapped back.

at the thought of justice sotomayor delivering ultimately pointless heat in dissenting opinion after dissenting opinion.

 

[DynamoEAR]

and some more

This report is amazing.

The whole point of the Independent Police Review Authority was to make sure shyt doesn't happen and they justified that bullshyt you quoted.

 

[Soymuscle Mike]

#trumpset absent from this thread.

 

[ORDER_66]

If only the DOJ turned their attention and deep probed the NYPD because internal affairs aint cutting it...