Rice'N Beckford
**King of ADOS**
No cause Im not a rest haven for women.
and thats one of the more responsible chicks i deal with. The other one's dont give af frfr
....matches coming in from possibly yrs ago




Man y’all ain’t see shyt yet. The longer it go the more desperate Some may get. And if you were a good nikka to her you better not do it. Leave that alone.
side note: when outside open back up y’all get ready. A lot of these women are going to be ready to fukk. Especially the ones with no in house dikk.
I had a bish tell me the other night that no matter what, No! Matter! what!...lifted quarantine or nah.....she coming over on May 1st to get the dack...

They doing recon on suppliesI just saw a video on this. Video said that "hobo"sexuals and couch surfers about to be at an all time high. Dude said 8 of his ex girlfriend's have hit him up.
Is this happening to ya'll too?



Give it a month or so...


Your theory is flawed because you can sense the negative assumption off gate.Hence the reason I'm asking dudes on the coli their experience on if they've ever had a woman breakup with them out the blue just to be totally alone.
Let's see if my theory is right or wrong.

I say I'm right, you say you're right, it's a contrast of theory which started a debate, in a public debate you present your case and allow the audience to come to their own conclusion based off evidence and logic.Your theory is flawed because you can sense the negative assumption off gate.
Like, the fact that I highlighted how your theory twists females character just so you can justify a narrative behind them not calling you.
you can tell off the first post how your idea came about, not because you’ve had some experience.
and look, NOW you asking for sample data from people in the forum to try to justify your POV, while you got simple nikkas just saying “you’re correct”.
What type of circle jerking is that?
definitely not John Hopkins University style of researching, I can tell you that![]()

I’m not saying I’m right, I’m saying you’re wrong in your assumptions for every woman...I say I'm right, you say you're right, it's a contrast of theory which started a debate, in a public debate you present your case and allow the audience to come to their own conclusion based off evidence and logic.
So in this case I ask the public to derive to their own conclusion based off their personal experiences. Nice try tho... you just gotta be a little better next time![]()
Woman have been monkey branching for ages, they even admit that themselves, what the fukk are you talking about?Your theory is flawed because you can sense the negative assumption off gate.
Like, the fact that I highlighted how your theory twists females character just so you can justify a narrative behind them not calling you.
you can tell off the first post how your idea came about, not because you’ve had some experience.
and look, NOW you asking for sample data from people in the forum to try to justify your POV, while you got simple nikkas just saying “you’re correct”.
What type of circle jerking is that?
definitely not John Hopkins University style of researching, I can tell you that![]()
Woman have been monkey branching for ages, they even admit that themselves, what the fukk are you talking about?
