Feminist Logic

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,596
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
Have you ever read any Radical Feminist literature breh? This is spot on.

Nah I haven't read any RADICAL feminist literature, because that would give me a RADICAL view of an otherwise sensible ideology. Same reason why I am not a RADICAL in anything else that I believe in.

Let's not be radical, its demonic, friend. :cheers:
 

Zapp Brannigan

Captain of the Nimbus
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
5,625
Reputation
690
Daps
8,382
Reppin
DOOP
Violence against women by men is obviously more extreme than the reverse, the converse, and the opposite, due to the nature of biological physical limitations that women USUALLY have. Usually. Please don't post pictures of swole lesbians saying that all women look like that. Laws are made for the majority not the exception.

As far as a woman "leeching" off a man for 18 years unilaterally... what are you talking about? The divorce laws in the Western World are totally equitable, and actually take into account income more than gender. If a man is working and his wife is taking care of the kids with the income the man is generating, and they split irreconcilably, the man is still obligated to take care of his children at the rate which they are either accustomed to, or the court sees is necessary.

There are a lot of studies that go against what you say about women committing violence against men and visa versa. The American Journal of Public Health did a related study. Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases. Men were more likely to injure than women, and reciprocal violence lead to more injury than single-sided violence. Why should we protect women because of their biological disadvantage if they're the ones more likely to commit unilateral violence anyway? The reciprocal cases is probably where the women started the fight in the first place, because the unilateral violence cases were so much more likely to be instigated by women.

Are we going to give an unequal amount of protection to women because men are effectively defending themselves when their wives and girlfriends try to skate by on the rule of "You can't hit me! I'm a GIRL!!"

Another release of data by CSULB concluded that women women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 371,600. This summary included hundred upon hundreds of summaries.

If you think that divorce laws are fair and equitable in this country, you need your head examined. There is nothing equitable about a woman getting alimony for money that she didn't earn and doesn't need. There is also nothing fair and equitable about a court system that is extremely more likely to favor women than men when it comes to things like child custody and child support. There is also the fact that women initiate 75% of divorces. Wonder why that is? They have less to lose and tons to gain because they more than likely chose a career in human resources to have something to do with her day while hubby worked ungodly hours to support her.

Also, women are much more easily able to make themselves look like victims in court. Being smaller and having softer features make it really easy to convince a court that they've been picked on by the big scary man, so after she leaves the courtroom she can laugh all the way to the bank.

Link related: Liz Mandarano: The Worst Thing A Woman Can Do In Divorce Proceedings - The Abuse Of Orders of Protection

:smh:
 

Zapp Brannigan

Captain of the Nimbus
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
5,625
Reputation
690
Daps
8,382
Reppin
DOOP
I always figured I was a pretty progressive dude thinking feminism was about equal pay, freedom from oppression, and that kinda stuff. Then I read the Internets.

Few weeks ago I saw an article where this chick said she wouldn't cook, even for herself, because of her feminist principles. She wouldn't dress up even if she was going to dinner or formal events because she didn't wanna be judged as an object. Anything associated with traditional gender roles was completely rejected as sexist.

Guess she set me straight.

The most annoying part of feminism is "I'm a sexy woman, so stop sexually objectifying me!!!!"

In other words, I'm going to convince you that despite being fat and out of shape, I am beautiful and sexy no matter what, but lord help you if you actually think that.

:childplease:
 

Zapp Brannigan

Captain of the Nimbus
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
5,625
Reputation
690
Daps
8,382
Reppin
DOOP
:whoo:

speak on it breh. love to hear stories like this. feminists are quick to get :skip: in an argument

I made my women's studies professor cry once. She sent me out of the room and called me a misogynist. I honestly don't know why this is even considered a field of study. I'm all for reproductive rights for both women AND men, meaning that a man shouldn't be legally obligated to take care of a child he doesn't want to if a woman can legally abort the child if she doesn't want to take care of it. And of course I believe in equal pay for equal work, access to education, etc. But feminism has outlived its usefulness for decades.

I'm all for equal rights, but to grant you special protection in an information-based modern society is just stupid. If you want the same respect and pay as a man, you'd damn well better be ready for the same responsibilities.

:cool:
 

Reality

Make your own luck.
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
7,189
Reputation
4,214
Daps
38,373
Reppin
NULL
I made my women's studies professor cry once. She sent me out of the room and called me a misogynist. I honestly don't know why this is even considered a field of study. I'm all for reproductive rights for both women AND men, meaning that a man shouldn't be legally obligated to take care of a child he doesn't want to if a woman can legally abort the child if she doesn't want to take care of it. And of course I believe in equal pay for equal work, access to education, etc. But feminism has outlived its usefulness for decades.

I'm all for equal rights, but to grant you special protection in an information-based modern society is just stupid. If you want the same respect and pay as a man, you'd damn well better be ready for the same responsibilities.

:cool:

lol break it down for me.
 

ThugLife

Diehard Jimmy Buckets fan
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
18,206
Reputation
3,100
Daps
49,120
Reppin
I bought a Carbon 15 when I was 18
As far as a woman "leeching" off a man for 18 years unilaterally... what are you talking about? The divorce laws in the Western World are totally equitable, and actually take into account income more than gender. If a man is working and his wife is taking care of the kids with the income the man is generating, and they split irreconcilably, the man is still obligated to take care of his children at the rate which they are either accustomed to, or the court sees is necessary.


kEkeS.gif
 

Zapp Brannigan

Captain of the Nimbus
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
5,625
Reputation
690
Daps
8,382
Reppin
DOOP
lol break it down for me.

Oh, she was talking about the pay gap myth and I was citing various statistics that were going against her sermon's lecture's center point: men are evil and the patriarchy hates you and only wants to rape you.

Here's what I said:
  1. Men are more likely to choose careers that are dangerous unlike women. This includes logging, mining, aviation, roofing, and farming.
  2. Men are more likely to choose higher paying fields of their own accord and not rely on the, "I'm gonna be a stay-at-home-mom" card.
  3. Men are more likely to have jobs that require travel, induce stress, or could otherwise be unpleasant.
  4. Men world 15% longer than women do at their jobs.
  5. Even in the same field, men are more likely to take on more stressful specializations. Example? Veteranarians are experiencing a shortage of large animal specialists because it's a woman-dominated profession and women ain't trying to fukk with bulls and giraffes.
  6. Despite all of the above, unmarried women are STILL more likely to earn more than their male counterparts!
  7. Female business owners make half of what their male counterparts make, which means that discrimination is taken out of the equation. This is because women place more value on shorter work hours, proximity to home, and any other comfort-inducing things rather than production and profits.

Sources:

http://www.consad.com/content/Reports/Gender Wage Gap Final report.pdf

www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/women_in_america.pdf

www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf

The Gender Pay Gap is a Complete Myth - CBS News
 

Sierra Mist

Banned
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
21,624
Reputation
-324
Daps
23,062
Oh, she was talking about the pay gap myth and I was citing various statistics that were going against her sermon's lecture's center point: men are evil and the patriarchy hates you and only wants to rape you.

Here's what I said:
  1. Men are more likely to choose careers that are dangerous unlike women. This includes logging, mining, aviation, roofing, and farming.
  2. Men are more likely to choose higher paying fields of their own accord and not rely on the, "I'm gonna be a stay-at-home-mom" card.
  3. Men are more likely to have jobs that require travel, induce stress, or could otherwise be unpleasant.
  4. Men world 15% longer than women do at their jobs.
  5. Even in the same field, men are more likely to take on more stressful specializations. Example? Veteranarians are experiencing a shortage of large animal specialists because it's a woman-dominated profession and women ain't trying to fukk with bulls and giraffes.
  6. Despite all of the above, unmarried women are STILL more likely to earn more than their male counterparts!
  7. Female business owners make half of what their male counterparts make, which means that discrimination is taken out of the equation. This is because women place more value on shorter work hours, proximity to home, and any other comfort-inducing things rather than production and profits.

Sources:

http://www.consad.com/content/Reports/Gender Wage Gap Final report.pdf

www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/women_in_america.pdf

www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf

The Gender Pay Gap is a Complete Myth - CBS News
Or the fact that women are attracted to men that make more money than them and still want men to take care of them. As long as women still get turned on by men driving nice cars the standard will never change, and for good reason. Men will never get excited over what car a woman pulls up to the club in. :laugh:
 

Reality

Make your own luck.
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
7,189
Reputation
4,214
Daps
38,373
Reppin
NULL
Oh, she was talking about the pay gap myth and I was citing various statistics that were going against her sermon's lecture's center point: men are evil and the patriarchy hates you and only wants to rape you.

Here's what I said:
  1. Men are more likely to choose careers that are dangerous unlike women. This includes logging, mining, aviation, roofing, and farming.
  2. Men are more likely to choose higher paying fields of their own accord and not rely on the, "I'm gonna be a stay-at-home-mom" card.
  3. Men are more likely to have jobs that require travel, induce stress, or could otherwise be unpleasant.
  4. Men world 15% longer than women do at their jobs.
  5. Even in the same field, men are more likely to take on more stressful specializations. Example? Veteranarians are experiencing a shortage of large animal specialists because it's a woman-dominated profession and women ain't trying to fukk with bulls and giraffes.
  6. Despite all of the above, unmarried women are STILL more likely to earn more than their male counterparts!
  7. Female business owners make half of what their male counterparts make, which means that discrimination is taken out of the equation. This is because women place more value on shorter work hours, proximity to home, and any other comfort-inducing things rather than production and profits.

Sources:

http://www.consad.com/content/Reports/Gender Wage Gap Final report.pdf

www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/women_in_america.pdf

www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf

The Gender Pay Gap is a Complete Myth - CBS News

Ether. :salute:

Someone on TV the other day mentioned the gender gap in pay and my girl said something like "that's a myth" and then proceeded to chat up the same points you did. I looked at her like :leon: I remember why i'm dating you.
 

thoushallhustle

All Star
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
4,267
Reputation
-950
Daps
4,870
I wish it were legal to kill stupid people. Feminism is a walking contradiction anyway. Feminists want patriarchy where it benefits them (men paying for dates, holding doors, protecting and providing) yet want matriarchy when convenient to them as well. If women truly knew what 100% equality was they would not like that shyt.

if it were you would be dead. as usual you are speaking on something you have no clue about and have only heard about.
 

Sierra Mist

Banned
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
21,624
Reputation
-324
Daps
23,062
if it were you would be dead. as usual you are speaking on something you have no clue about and have only heard about.

How would I be dead? The problem is I do know what I'm talking about. Feminists want to maintain all the traditional perks of being a woman, while gaining power that men traditionally have. Then when they get the power and fukk up they still blame men, absolving themselves of all the responsibility that comes with it.

If you want equality then have 100% equality. Don't say you want to be equal to men then say you don't want to be eligible to get drafted during war, that men can't hit you, that men should pay for your dates, that men should pay 100% of your "escort" services, that men should hold doors for you and that men should protect you and provide for you.

You want to have your cake and eat it too. I'm here to tell you that it doesn't work that way.

You can't say "Let me drive this car because it's equal" then after you crash say "well you was da man. that was your job."

Last I checked 90% equal didn't mean 100% equal. If you want it to be equal then fukk it, let's make it equal. I mean EQUAL. Not "I want some things from this pillar here, but let me keep all the flower stuff from my pillar over here." Nope.... 100% equal. Women would NOT like that shyt.

To have the same responsibilities of men while losing those perks of being a woman..... hold up chick. It's EQUAL now.

Relinquish your female perks and privileges, take equal accountability that men take, then you can have all the equality you want.
 
Top