1. Not yet, but it was on its way. Chavez took steps to make the executive office a long-term, more absolute authority. That's always a dangerous thing.
2. I think you have too much faith in that government.
3. The opposition provocateurs are violent, too, obviously. But that doesn't excuse the kind of police crackdowns we're seeing.
4. Cracking down on news reporters is always a bad. Silencing press freedom, whether or not it's a company or view you don't agree with, is characteristic of an authoritarian government, isn't it?
I already stated that the revolt was funded by negative forces, but that doesn't mean the protesters don't have legitimate grievances. Rampant inflation, corruption, runaway executive power, and silencing freedom of press are all profoundly negative things and people should be protesting about them. Unless you can see both sides, you won't get a complete picture of this situation.
1. He was voted in multiple times. Chavez was always for the people and it proved so.
2. Maduro would lose all trust from the people of Venezuela if he did so. The police state will come after he is overthrown. Pretty much everything I said in the last few years about Venezuela has come true.
3. Violence begets violence my friend...sorry many people's logic fit that narrative. Is it right....no.
4. Again what news reporters are you speaking of? You haven't made a clear indication who is who in this.
Yes I dapped you on that statement earlier but the protestors legitimate grievances don't exist if it's not coming from all sides. Only the opposition is complaining and they have been doing for years. They want complete control of the country to make it back to what it was....a U.S. puppet state.
If freedom of speech was silenced...then why is there a opposition? Again read the articles I posted...Maduro can't and won't have a chance to do well period because out-side forces want him out and their elite in. What is hard for you to comprehend that?