Flat Earthers.....HOLD THIS L!!!!!!!!!!

[JQ Legend]

Say we extend a line from the center-point of the circle out to the edge. That would be the radius. Do that a few more times until you get 24 triangles. Each of the triangles would have the same angle near the center which would widen the further away from the center you get. Now, picture someone living on that flat disc looking at a Sun moving in a circular pattern above themselves. Close to the center, the Sun's angle would change by a certain amount, but the FURTHER AWAY FROM THE CENTER YOU GET, THE LARGER THE ANGLE BECOMES!!!!!

There is NO WAY the Sun's angle would change by the SAME amount regardless of your position since at the edge, the angle would be more obtuse than near the center. 15 degrees in NY would be 80 degrees (or more) at the tip of South America.​

@xCivicx

And these are my words

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Dude is like 'Show my responses'......BUT ALL HIS RESPONSES DODGED THE QUESTIONS!!!!!

Then he has the AUDACITY to talk about someone following another person when his entire stance is based on a few Youtube videos and a book written in the 19th Century!!!!!

​

 

[NeoSeeker]

Unless I missed it, no one has answered why we can clearly see the moon and sun are round, as well as all the other planets, so then why would the Earth be flat?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Notice, also, that the people he put on 'Ignore' can both hand him his ass regarding physics and ask him questions he can't answer.

​

 

[-G$-]

Unless I missed it, no one has answered why we can clearly see the moon and sun are round, as well as all the other planets, so then why would the Earth be flat?

CGI, breh

 

[THE MACHINE]

If the Earth is flat where are the pictures from the "flat" side that doesn't have the land on it? Also, that would mean there's a huge cliff at the poles right?

So basically it's supposed to look like a coin spin in on its axis?

And what is the reason NASA and every other space agency known to man are afraid to admit its flat again?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

CGI, breh

That means Galileo was using Photoshop back in the 16th Century CE......even though Photoshop wasn't created until 1988!!!!!

​

 

[xCivicx]

Say we extend a line from the center-point of the circle out to the edge. That would be the radius. Do that a few more times until you get 24 triangles. Each of the triangles would have the same angle near the center which would widen the further away from the center you get. Now, picture someone living on that flat disc looking at a Sun moving in a circular pattern above themselves. Close to the center, the Sun's angle would change by a certain amount, but the FURTHER AWAY FROM THE CENTER YOU GET, THE LARGER THE ANGLE BECOMES!!!!!

There is NO WAY the Sun's angle would change by the SAME amount regardless of your position since at the edge, the angle would be more obtuse than near the center. 15 degrees in NY would be 80 degrees (or more) at the tip of South America.​

@xCivicx

And these are my words

It still maths out to 15 degrees an hour smh

The further away from the north pole you are, the slower the sun APPEARS to move, because the angular diameter of the motion is increasing

Just like if you ride a carousel, the closer to the center of the carousel you are, the faster you appear to be spinning

But you're still only moving 360 degrees no matter where you are on the carousel

 

[-G$-]

That means Galileo was using Photoshop back in the 16th Century CE......even though Photoshop wasn't created until 1988!!!!!

​

I already answered this question in the other flat earth threads. I don’t know what to tell you, breh.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I already answered this question in the other flat earth threads. I don’t know what to tell you, breh.

What University did you attend to obtain your degree and how many cereal box tops and soup can labels did you have to send them to get it?

​

 

[xCivicx]

Unless I missed it, no one has answered why we can clearly see the moon and sun are round, as well as all the other planets, so then why would the Earth be flat?

This is a strawman

Just because you look up and see CIRCULAR OBJECTS in the sky(that you seem to imagine are SPHERES, without any kind of proof to back that up), that doesn't mean that anything you see in the sky is a solid, 3 dimensional object

I proved that with eclipses multiple times

Again, y'all are exposing y'alls lack of understanding of basic shapes

 

[Hannibal Fox]

Yo @xCivicx

can we get the sources where you get your information?
What makes you authority on the subject?

Here you go breh these are some of the leading figures in the FE Movement


Eric Dubay
Jeran Campanella aka Jeranism
Mark Sargent
Bob Knodel

Then throw in:

D. Marble
M Bens
DelanoTV

When they wanna hide behind black dudes and pretend they weren't checking for the former names first when they get called out

The fact that Eric Dubay is taken seriously is just

He was the dude who really helped push this notion again:

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

'Angular diameter of the motion is decreasing'.............................

Dude is just stringing words together in hopes that people that KNOW what they're talking about don't call him on it.

THERE AIN'T NO SUCH THING AS ANGULAR DIAMETER OF THE MOTION, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!

In case you meant 'angular diameter of the MOON' you're still an imbecile because that STILL wouldn't explain why the SUN moves 15 degrees/hr. regardless of your position on the planet. It doesn't just 'appear' to move.

You completely misunderstand and misrepresent the Law of Perspective because you don't know what you're talking about.

a = 2 * arctan (g/2r)

a = angular size of an object
g = diameter of said object
r = distance of observer from object.​

 

[xCivicx]

If the Earth is flat where are the pictures from the "flat" side that doesn't have the land on it? Also, that would mean there's a huge cliff at the poles right?

So basically it's supposed to look like a coin spin in on its axis?

And what is the reason NASA and every other space agency known to man are afraid to admit its flat again?

The bold is gibberish

Nasa pushes the propaganda because y'all allow them to get $10 billion+ a year in taxpayer money and y'all don't hold them to any kinds of standards of production

They told y'all they can't go back to the moon because they destroyed the technology and y'all accepted it no questions asked

They give y'all heavily photoshopped fake "photos" of the earth(that can be produced on a free version of photoshop) and y'all accept it no questions asked

At this point they know that they can tell y'all whatever and keep pulling in billions a year for minimal work

 

[THE MACHINE]

The bold is gibberish

Nasa pushes the propaganda because y'all allow them to get $10 billion+ a year in taxpayer money and y'all don't hold them to any kinds of standards of production

They told y'all they can't go back to the moon because they destroyed the technology and y'all accepted it no questions asked

They give y'all heavily photoshopped fake "photos" of the earth(that can be produced on a free version of photoshop) and y'all accept it no questions asked

At this point they know that they can tell y'all whatever and keep pulling in billions a year for minimal work

You should be able to see a sharp edge from a high altitude military plane though right? Wouldn't have to be our military. Where are the photos? Aren't there tons of other space agencies with satellites? Why is there no image of the "other side" of the earth if all the land is on one side?