Yes. Happens often enough you should be still in try to win mode down 4. That game was his own damn conferenceDidn’t Virginia beat Louisville earlier this year down 4 with like 0.05 seconds left or some shyt?![]()
Yes. Happens often enough you should be still in try to win mode down 4. That game was his own damn conferenceDidn’t Virginia beat Louisville earlier this year down 4 with like 0.05 seconds left or some shyt?![]()
Lol what? Don’t have to Inbound the ball? And calling others stupidExactly
She and those others who questioned why he didn't foul, knew that shyt was over.
If he misses the front end,, wait they were in a double bonus, shooting 2 FTs, dude who had the ball is a 90% FT shooter as you say, he really missing 2 FTs down the line, when he already made them on the previously trip as you say, but let's think like these dummies and let's say dude misses 2 FT, you're still down by 4 with the length of the court to go. Let's say they make a 3, you down 1 under 5 seconds, UM doesn't even have to inbound the ball, thus the clock will run out and they still lose.
Ppl are just stupid, the man knew what he was doing.

nikka just started making up rulesExactly
She and those others who questioned why he didn't foul, knew that shyt was over.
If he misses the front end,, wait they were in a double bonus, shooting 2 FTs, dude who had the ball is a 90% FT shooter as you say, he really missing 2 FTs down the line, when he already made them on the previously trip as you say, but let's think like these dummies and let's say dude misses 2 FT, you're still down by 4 with the length of the court to go. Let's say they make a 3, you down 1 under 5 seconds, UM doesn't even have to inbound the ball, thus the clock will run out and they still lose.
Ppl are just stupid, the man knew what he was doing.


Underrated postHe had money on the game. He wanted to lose by 4. Line was -4.5
I knew he looked familiarBunny Colvin looking ass![]()
THE 90% FOUL SHOOTER
WHO JUST CLINCHED THE GAME
HAD THE BALL.
WHY ARE YALL MENTIONING FT RANKS?
IF BY SOME VERY SLIM CHANCE HE MISSES BOTH FTS
THEY HAVE NO TIMEOUTS AND HAVE TO GO FULL COURT JUST TO MAKE IT
A ONE POSSESSION GAME.
HIS TEAM CANT EVEN SHOOT.
shyt WAS OVER.
That's a terrible cop out, and not even close to accurate. Coaches like Pop and Belichick get plenty of crap for their answers, but the questions they are asked are usually incredibly stupid questions. Dana Jacobson asked him WHY THEY DID NOT FOUL, and he gives her this confused look and says, "What are you talking about, do you really think that cost us the game"? She didn't say anything about it costing them the game at that point, but then pointed out almost EVERYONE was questioning why he didn't have his team foul, including me, because he cost me my parlay..
It was the heat of the moment and I'm not going to give him too much shyt for the way he answered the question(s), but they were legitimate questions and he came across as being extremely defensive for something MANY people were questioning.
fukk your parlay. Did you watch the game? Florida State had no time outs, their two best players had four fouls a piece and they would have sent a 90% FT to the line. It was a two possession game before the fact. The game was over.
A game is over with 11 seconds left and down four? A missed FT and then hitting a three with say, for or five seconds left on the clock makes it a one point game.


THEY WERE IN THE DOUBLE BONUS.
90% FT SHOOTER HAD TO MISS
2 FT FOR YOUR SCENARIO TO HAVE ANY CHANCE OF MAKING SENSE.

