For all you idiots that want to vote 3rd party

[Zee]

We get it, Trump's gonna destroy the world so vote Clinton. Terrible argument.

Even though Hillary Clinton is more likely to destroy it. The crazy bytch wants a war with Russia.

 

[StatUS]

Horrible argument, especially considering how now one can't tell us how Clinton isn't going to destroy the world considering she is he the hawkish of the 2. Again, his only argument is don't vote 3rd party, because Clinton needs to beat Trump, ignoring the fact that both are boo boo.

If the only way you can be sold as a candidate is by basically not being the other person, you might not be a good candidate.

I'd agree with an argument that she's better based on her starting from the center right instead of the far right like Trump for the pragmatic vote. But conjuring some type of apocalyptic scenario to support a socially liberal war monger doesn't compute. Olbermann used to be the man too, damn shame.

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

a few people in here got super triggered

good thread, op

I get triggered by Old Liberal Cacs telling me what they want me to do pretending theyre helping me but the Truth is theyre lying for a paycheck on behalf of the very same Bankers and Bomb-makers who have been fukking everyone over the last 20 years

He bloviates about how "dangerous" Trump is while endorsing the True Warhawk without a hint of shame...and its a shame how he fronts like this Opinion comes from him

when it probably comes from the parent company that owns the network GE..(Yeah they make more than refrigerators )..3 Billion a year in "defense contracts"...No wonder they want Hillary to win

Fukk Olberman and his dumbass speech from GE

 

[88m3]

I get triggered by Old Liberal Cacs telling me what they want me to do pretending theyre helping me but the Truth is theyre lying for a paycheck on behalf of the very same Bankers and Bomb-makers who have been fukking everyone over since JFK got whacked...

He bloviates about how "dangerous" Trump is while endorsing the True Warhawk without a hint of shame...and its a shame how he fronts like this Opinion comes from him

when it probably comes from the parent company that owns the network GE..(Yeah they make more than refrigerators )..3 Billion a year in "defense contracts"...No wonder they want Hillary to win

Fukk Olberman and his dumbass speech from GE

Thanks you really convinced me.

 

[General Mills]

One of the reasons why more and more are looking at 3rd party candidates is because Liberals act swarmy and arrogant as fukk.

All politics aside. Nobody wants to be talked down too. And you are not going to scare or punk me into voting for a career politician who is secretive and slimy.

 

[bzb]

never mind how people voting 3rd party in 2000 led to a few unnecessary wars, one of the most egregious erosions of privacy, a huge national debt, and a horrible recession that many people arguably still haven't recovered from.



this election is shaping up to be a blowout, but if for some reason it tightens up...save that vote your conscience shyt for the next cycle...

 

[88m3]

third party is a bridge to nowhere

 

[No1]

It's like dudes didn't even watch the video. fukking idiots.

Most people here resigned to vote HRC you fukking clown. No one needs condescending a$$holes like you who don't even participate in HL trying to preach. I hate people who think they're smarter than they are.

 

[No1]

never mind how people voting 3rd party in 2000 led to a few unnecessary wars, one of the most egregious erosions of privacy, a huge national debt, and a horrible recession that many people arguably still haven't recovered from.



this election is shaping up to be a blowout, but if for some reason it tightens up...save that vote your conscience shyt for the next cycle...

Why exactly did people not want Gore? Disaffected progressives. So you're dealing with the results and not the cause and letting people off. Moreover the Dems supported the war in Iraq and so did all gore. Obama has further eroded our privacy and the deregulation that helped lead to the poor economy occurred under Clinton. So what exactly are you talking about? You guys drink the Dem kool-aid and then try to preach. I tell people vote for HRC and never say any of this shyt. This is what turns people off. You're parroting talking points.

And more Dems in Florida voted Bush than Nader. So you're right voting conscience did fukk shyt up but not in the way you believe.

 

[bzb]

Why exactly did people not want Gore? Disaffected progressives. So you're dealing with the results and not the cause and letting people off. Moreover the Dems supported the war in Iraq and so did all gore. Obama has further eroded our privacy and the deregulation that helped lead to the poor economy occurred under Clinton. So what exactly are you talking about? You guys drink the Dem kool-aid and then try to preach. I tell people vote for HRC and never say any of this shyt. This is what turns people off. You're parroting talking points.

And more Dems in Florida voted Bush than Nader. So you're right voting conscience did fukk shyt up but not in the way you believe.

gore was in a tough position. coming off an clinton impeachment, being a low energy guy, the us being in a relatively good position with not much to lose, bush having name recognition and a very powerful machine behind him was going to make it tough anyway.

the iraq war vote......trump uses that same line about dems supporting the war in iraq. when everyone was being lied to about yellow cake, links to 911, and cherry picked intelligence by the bush admin...there really wasn't another choice for any politician but to support the war in iraq.

i'd wager 90% of people who voted nader in 2000 in florida and new hampshire would drive a nail through their voting hand if they could go back and change their vote to gore.

i'm bringing up real points about how voting 3rd party in a tight race caused a tangible impact. you don't like it, so what, i don't care.

 

[StatUS]

Why exactly did people not want Gore? Disaffected progressives. So you're dealing with the results and not the cause and letting people off. Moreover the Dems supported the war in Iraq and so did all gore. Obama has further eroded our privacy and the deregulation that helped lead to the poor economy occurred under Clinton. So what exactly are you talking about? You guys drink the Dem kool-aid and then try to preach. I tell people vote for HRC and never say any of this shyt. This is what turns people off. You're parroting talking points.

And more Dems in Florida voted Bush than Nader. So you're right voting conscience did fukk shyt up but not in the way you believe.

Gore won Florida he was just too p*ssy to go through with a recount. And like you said slot of libs voted Bush too. Plus his running mate was Lieberman of all people so what was the difference at that time

Anybody falling for the Dem spin that Nadar spoiled the election doesn't have the facts.

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

Thanks you really convinced me.

Je vous en prie

 

[No1]

Gore won Florida he was just too p*ssy to go through with a recount. And like you said slot of libs voted Bush too. Plus his running mate was Lieberman of all people so what was the difference at that time

Anybody falling for the Dem spin that Nadar spoiled the election doesn't have the facts.

It wasn't his fault though. The Supreme Court stopped a full recount from happening.

 

[StatUS]

It wasn't his fault though. The Supreme Court stopped a full recount from happening.

He could have continued to challenge through the court but he wanted to be the good statesman and concede to Bush.

 

[the next guy]

Keith olderman is a retard and this thread? It's also retarded

This bum can't even keep a job.