Former Google+ employee: We fukked Up

L

Liquid

Superstar
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
37,121
Reputation
2,660
Daps
59,924
CNN-- A former Google+ employee who spent three years helping create Google+ has written a brutal blog post declaring the tech giant's social network a failure.

In a lengthy, at times profane breakdown on blogging platform Medium, Chris Messina, the man credited as inventor of the hashtag, writes that Google missed a chance to make the service a one-stop home for its users' online identities and, instead, created a less-popular Facebook copycat.

"Lately, I just feel like Google+ is confused and adrift at sea," Messina wrote. "It's so far behind, how can it possibly catch up?"

The November 28 post was a follow-up to a tweet in which he had mistakenly called out a bug on Google+ that was actually caused by an external app. Even as he corrected himself, he called out Google for the network's missed opportunity.

"I f---ed up," Messina wrote. "So has Google."

Messina left Google over a year ago to join a startup. Before that, he had worked on the short-lived Google Buzz social product, then Google+.

He wrote that while it was being developed under the code name "Emerald Sea," Google+ was internally being called "Google Me." The idea at the time, he said, was to make the site a sort of home base for users, where they would decide which information they'd like to share about themselves and with whom they'd like to share it.

"It was like Google was saying, 'We're going to be your trusted partner in cyberspace, and we'll help you surface the right information to the people you choose, at the right time'," Messina wrote. "It was a functional search-oriented value proposition, rather than a social networking one.

"Thus, for me, when I searched for my mom's phone number on Google, I actually find it -- because it would be on her profile and she would have shared it with me. Suddenly a query like 'mom phone number' would work."

Instead, he wrote, Google+ became "a kind of Facebook-lite."

"Why did the world need another Facebook, unless to benefit Google by making their ad targeting more effective?" Messina wrote.

Google did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment for this article.

Messina wrote that innovation appears to be slowing for the Web tool. In a chart, he said Google+ and Hangouts, its well-liked video chat tool, have been updated with six apps each in 2014, compared with 15 for YouTube and 16 for Chrome, both of which are also Google properties, and 19 for Facebook, 29 for Instagram and 33 for Twitter.

Aside from his personal interest, Messina said he's disappointed because Facebook, with its more than 1.3 billion users, needs competition.

"The future of digital identity should not be determined by one company (namely, Facebook)," he said. "I still believe that competition in this space is better for consumers, for startups, and for the industry. And Google still remains one of the few companies (besides Apple, perhaps) that stands a chance to take on Facebook in this arena -- but Google+, as I see it, has lost its way."
Click to expand...
@Rohiggidy :sas2:
 
Thoughts

Thoughts

Banned
Joined
Nov 18, 2013
Messages
5,077
Reputation
-385
Daps
7,590
I agree with what he's saying. Facebook was able to beat out Google+ back in 2011 because their developers were more concerned with doing what Facebook did best, which is "connect people". Google+ was more concerned with curating a contrived user-base which would make it easier to index its millions of users, not only that they tried to appropriate the user's content to make it part of it's core function which is the "best search engine".

If Google+ actually intended to "connect people", instead of just an elaborate attempt at a digital yellow pages, Facebook's 2011 decline would've have been permanent. Instead of appropriation, Facebook acquired companies, and in turn buying their user-bases but not interrupting the retention these individual companies have with their users. WhatsApp and Instagram, inoculating Google's threat, and making profit.


Google should take the L on this, and continue their work with maps and automated vehicles, this would ultimately give them control of the auto industry. And if cars are gonna be assigned digital owners in the future, they can have an advantage over Facebook
 
Rohiggidy

Rohiggidy

The Big League
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,576
Reputation
80
Daps
2,433
Reppin
New York
Winston Zeddemore said:
I agree with what he's saying. Facebook was able to beat out Google+ back in 2011 because their developers were more concerned with doing what Facebook did best, which is "connect people". Google+ was more concerned with curating a contrived user-base which would make it easier to index its millions of users, not only that they tried to appropriate the user's content to make it part of it's core function which is the "best search engine".

If Google+ actually intended to "connect people", instead of just an elaborate attempt at a digital yellow pages, Facebook's 2011 decline would've have been permanent. Instead of appropriation, Facebook acquired companies, and in turn buying their user-bases but not interrupting the retention these individual companies have with their users. WhatsApp and Instagram, inoculating Google's threat, and making profit.


Google should take the L on this, and continue their work with maps and automated vehicles, this would ultimately give them control of the auto industry. And if cars are gonna be assigned digital owners in the future, they can have an advantage over Facebook
Click to expand...
Google+ is much better than Facebook. Its about the content not users. Who cares about having a billion people with shytty content
 
Jesus Shuttlesworth

Jesus Shuttlesworth

I Got Game
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
11,985
Reputation
1,846
Daps
20,236
Reppin
Sovereignty
:mjlol: @ google plus



michael-jordan-laughing_zps0e1c555c.gif
@ clown defending that bullshyt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top