Fresh Out Of Jail!!! Floyd "Money" Mayweather

Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
4,503
Reputation
530
Daps
7,584
Reppin
The Sweet Science
Whether he ate it or not, is irrelevant (he brought the carcass back, so most likely someone ate it)....he explicitly told you WHY he was hunting that day. Cuz he was bored. Not cuz he was hungry. If the golf course wasn't packed that day, that "beautiful" buck would've never died. Vick killed those dogs for entertainment, Brett killed that deer for entertainment.

LMAO @ Hunting being in his blood cuz he's part Native American. First, Native Americans didn't hunt for sport. Second, Brett just picked it up shortly before that article (circa 2000), it's not something he had been doing since birth.

It's funny to use Brett's Native American roots to justify Brett sneaking a defenseless buck, yet ignoring Vick's roots in how he handled those dogs....that's how it's done in dog fighting culture, it's not like he invented that part.

Do you honestly think Vick drowning a wounded animal was for entertainment? That the electrocution and hanging of animals was for entertainment? :manny: that sh!t is a few steps above
whatever crazy that is or could be associated with hunting.

I was just making a cheap off hand joke about Brett being part Native American and it being in his blood it was kinda dumb in hindsight but nobodies on all the time

If he ate it or not is somewhat relevant unless your advocating a vegan lifestyle. For you to eat meat they have to kill the animal, they dont wait for the animal to die of old age.

The question is do you consider Favre shooting an animal in sport and then eating it to be as bad as Vick not only breeding and raising dogs(and some of the grimy sh!t that entails) for the sole purpose of making them fight to the death? Then the added factor of if they were unlucky enough to lose and not die then they would have to suffer whatever Psycho Michael Vick came up with to kill them.
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
28,001
Reputation
4,823
Daps
104,257
Do you honestly think Vick drowning a wounded animal was for entertainment? That the electrocution and hanging of animals was for entertainment? :manny: that sh!t is a few steps above
whatever crazy that is or could be associated with hunting.

No, I honestly think that he did that cuz that's which is done in the dogfighting culture he was participating in. He didn't use his "psychotic mind" to decide to do those acts, and they weren't a part of the entertainment.

The question is do you consider Favre shooting an animal in sport and then eating it to be as bad as Vick not only breeding and raising dogs(and some of the grimy sh!t that entails) for the sole purpose of making them fight to the death? Then the added factor of if they were unlucky enough to lose and not die then they would have to suffer whatever Psycho Michael Vick came up with to kill them.

As bad? perhaps, but for different reasons. Obviously, the method in which the dogs were killed were worse, but the reasoning was better, imo. Death in the name of gaming is easier for me to swallow than killing on bored-fueled whim. :yeshrug:

Neither bother me. My thing is that if you're truly an animal lover who is against seeing animals needlessly die, then you would also be against hunting and fishing for sport.
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
4,503
Reputation
530
Daps
7,584
Reppin
The Sweet Science
No, I honestly think that he did that cuz that's which is done in the dogfighting culture he was participating in. He didn't use his "psychotic mind" to decide to do those acts, and they weren't a part of the entertainment.



As bad? perhaps, but for different reasons. Obviously, the method in which the dogs were killed were worse, but the reasoning was better, imo. Death in the name of gaming is easier for me to swallow than killing on bored-fueled whim. :yeshrug:

Neither bother me. My thing is that if you're truly an animal lover who is against seeing animals needlessly die, then you would also be against hunting and fishing for sport.

You said it was done for entertainment blaming a culture for it is foolish
I doubt that all dog fighters torture their dogs to death. You gotta be responsible for your own actions

How was killing something in a way that atleast takes some skill(though I think if you hunt for sport you should only use a knife), is somewhat humane and in fact is used for sustanance harder to swallow than a man gettin angry at a dog over something not natural to its behavior then not only killing it when it could still survive but doing it a way that would classify you as a psychopath
 
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
25,592
Reputation
4,536
Daps
69,298
Reppin
NULL
A 35 yr. old man with that much muscle mass...he might need to break down some of that.


Might this newfound muscle be bad for his boxing career? Slow him down, etc.?

:snoop: nikkas gone always have something to say. If he came out and he slimmed down nikkas would be sayin he looks starved...

May 5 Floyd gon be in ideal fighting shape, u can count on that like you do your paycheck
 

aixenv

Lakers World Order
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
690
Reputation
10
Daps
373
Reppin
Los Angeles
I could respect this if you went as hard at the likes of Brett Favre....talumbout he should be picked off, shot at close range, unexpectedly as he walked down the street.

But since you likely won't :pacspit:

well since you brought it up, im against any type of hunting, i was simply discussing the vick part, hunting would be more fair if the deer had guns also

mgtn72l.jpg


killin' a defenseless deer and hanging it up on the wall just because it has some horns is pretty barbaric, now if you were hunting to put food on your table, and what not, then i can understand that, gotta provide for your family, but brett doesnt need to do that, so ya, i am against that also. give the deer a gun and give him a fighting chance let's see how game these fat lazy b*stards are then to wanna go "hunting"
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
28,001
Reputation
4,823
Daps
104,257
:laff: @ dudes acting like Floyd did a ten year bid.
He's finally free breh :gladbron:
well since you brought it up, im against any type of hunting, i was simply discussing the vick part, hunting would be more fair if the deer had guns also

mgtn72l.jpg


killin' a defenseless deer and hanging it up on the wall just because it has some horns is pretty barbaric, now if you were hunting to put food on your table, and what not, then i can understand that, gotta provide for your family, but brett doesnt need to do that, so ya, i am against that also. give the deer a gun and give him a fighting chance let's see how game these fat lazy b*stards are then to wanna go "hunting"

I can respect this, can we get a fukk Brett Favre?
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,835
Daps
43,541
Do you honestly think Vick drowning a wounded animal was for entertainment? That the electrocution and hanging of animals was for entertainment? :manny: that sh!t is a few steps above
whatever crazy that is or could be associated with hunting.

I was just making a cheap off hand joke about Brett being part Native American and it being in his blood it was kinda dumb in hindsight but nobodies on all the time

If he ate it or not is somewhat relevant unless your advocating a vegan lifestyle. For you to eat meat they have to kill the animal, they dont wait for the animal to die of old age.

The question is do you consider Favre shooting an animal in sport and then eating it to be as bad as Vick not only breeding and raising dogs(and some of the grimy sh!t that entails) for the sole purpose of making them fight to the death? Then the added factor of if they were unlucky enough to lose and not die then they would have to suffer whatever Psycho Michael Vick came up with to kill them.

images


Give it up. Yo subliminally racist views got exposed for not applying the same sentiments to Vick as you do to Favre and most animal hunters, who hunt for sport. I'm sure the downsouth Georgia rednecks would love for you to come over and get at them :russ: You know in Asia, they eat fish and another animals half alive? You ever been to a butcher? Not justifying what Vick did, but a lot of hypocrisy in your statement B. Racism, we off that
 
Top