InvictusAeternusEternus
In the cut
Whether he ate it or not, is irrelevant (he brought the carcass back, so most likely someone ate it)....he explicitly told you WHY he was hunting that day. Cuz he was bored. Not cuz he was hungry. If the golf course wasn't packed that day, that "beautiful" buck would've never died. Vick killed those dogs for entertainment, Brett killed that deer for entertainment.
LMAO @ Hunting being in his blood cuz he's part Native American. First, Native Americans didn't hunt for sport. Second, Brett just picked it up shortly before that article (circa 2000), it's not something he had been doing since birth.
It's funny to use Brett's Native American roots to justify Brett sneaking a defenseless buck, yet ignoring Vick's roots in how he handled those dogs....that's how it's done in dog fighting culture, it's not like he invented that part.
Do you honestly think Vick drowning a wounded animal was for entertainment? That the electrocution and hanging of animals was for entertainment?

whatever crazy that is or could be associated with hunting.
I was just making a cheap off hand joke about Brett being part Native American and it being in his blood it was kinda dumb in hindsight but nobodies on all the time
If he ate it or not is somewhat relevant unless your advocating a vegan lifestyle. For you to eat meat they have to kill the animal, they dont wait for the animal to die of old age.
The question is do you consider Favre shooting an animal in sport and then eating it to be as bad as Vick not only breeding and raising dogs(and some of the grimy sh!t that entails) for the sole purpose of making them fight to the death? Then the added factor of if they were unlucky enough to lose and not die then they would have to suffer whatever Psycho Michael Vick came up with to kill them.