From Russia with Trump

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I didn't say you were but the dude you tweeted sounds like a definite Trump supporter. @ThreeLetterAgency is already exposing receipts and people who defend Trump on this thread are pretending to ignore it......... that's not intellectual

they just don't wanna learn.

Heres the problem, they learned the government lied in the past, therefore they don't 'trust the government ever again

But the only reason they know they lied was because they found out AFTER the fact.

Predicting the next lie is impossible, so they always adopt the "anti-" position instead of investigating the original claim

They don't like being lied to so they think the opposite of what they hear is therefore true.

They're just as flawed in their reasoning as someone who can't evaluate evidence.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Duly noted. So we take it a step further
Were the evidence released forged?

You mean the emails?

Some of them were edited.

Thats also the problem.

Foreign Policy Magazine wrote about months ago: Turns Out You Can’t Trust Russian Hackers Anymore

They've faked, reworded, and left meta-data all over the files they interacted with.

They just don't care cause 99% of people don't know the details.

I mean, even the leaked emails about the DNC barely show any wrong doing outside of work-place banter. But that doesn't matter. People look at any framing of the data to mean something more than what the actual source document says.

 

[SmokyQuartz]

kyle kulinsky is a progressive who has criticized trump many times on his show, Secular Talk.
by the way, people who defend trump without any eidence are just as idiotic as people who support hillary without any proof.

I don't support Hillary but it seems like people who are defending Trump in this thread are ignoring facts. Someone has already posted receipts and yet people still say there is no evidence. If more receipts start to come out people will just either say its fake or outright ignore it no matter how legit the info is.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

You mean the emails?

Some of them were edited.

Thats also the problem.

Foreign Policy Magazine wrote about months ago: Turns Out You Can’t Trust Russian Hackers Anymore

They've faked, reworded, and left meta-data all over the files they interacted with.

They just don't care cause 99% of people don't know the details.

I mean, even the leaked emails about the DNC barely show any wrong doing outside of work-place banter. But that doesn't matter. People look at any framing of the data to mean something more than what the actual source document says.

The barely shown wrong doings were enough for the DNC to fire an exec, without contending the contents of the email

So like I asked in my edited original post, is this now a Snowden type of release, to expose or is it a release with forging? If you're finna say both, then we can't make a blanket statement like the Russian hack group influenced the election because they also exposed factual wrong doings, that the DNC should not have been engaged in

The article you posted from Esquire talks of the Chinese government hacking both foreign government and foreign citizen emails, for their own economical advantage, but yet we still do business with them and they haven't received the same negative media attention like Russia. So had the election turned out in Hillary favor, I doubt much of this Russian hacking groups' involvement behind the DNC leaks would be made public. It would have received the Chinese hacking treatment, which should have received the same amount of attention, like this Russian groups' hacking

 

[SirReginald]

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

The barely shown wrong doings were enough for the DNC to fire an exec, without contending the contents of the email

So like I asked in my edited original post, is this now a Snowden type of release, to expose or is it a release with forging? If you're finna say both, then we can't make a blanket statement like the Russian hack group influenced the election because they also exposed factual wrong doings, that the DNC should not have been engaged in

The article you posted from Esquire talks of the Chinese government hacking both foreign government and foreign citizen emails, for their own economical advantage, but yet we still do business with them and they haven't received the same negative media attention like Russia. So had the election turned out in Hillary favor, I doubt much of this Russian hacking groups' involvement behind the DNC leaks would be made public. It would have received the Chinese hacking treatment, which should have received the same amount of attention, like this Russian groups' hacking

1. The DNC didn't break any rules.

2. Read the source document : Bears in the Midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee »

3. Russians leaked emails to influence the election. Its literally psychological warfare meant to undermine trust in the system.

Here is why thats a huge problem:

 

[Celerii]

@the cac mamba
this thread.....

 

[the cac mamba]

3. Russians leaked emails to influence the election. Its literally psychological warfare meant to undermine trust in the system.

so the problem isnt that the DNC is one of the most corrupt entities in the country, and it actually cant be trusted. even though they're one of two 'choices' americans have for political parties

the problem is that russia exposed them as such?

 

[SmokyQuartz]

so the problem isnt that the DNC is one of the most corrupt entities in the country, and it actually cant be trusted. even though they're one of two 'choices' americans have for political parties

the problem is that russia exposed them as such?

So its cool that RUSSIA just tampers with American databases?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

so the problem isnt that the DNC is one of the most corrupt entities in the country, and it actually cant be trusted. even though they're one of two 'choices' americans have for political parties

the problem is that russia exposed them as such?

What did the DNC do wrong?

lets get into it...cause its clear y'all don't read past headlines

 

[b_low_brown]

NPR has an article that states exactly where the hacks came from, A.P.T. 26 & 28. Look it up.

Nonsense. Y'all keep pushing articles in my face when I ask for evidence. Show me where it shows Russians hacked the DNC. The exact line, because I just can't find it

 

[b_low_brown]

So its cool that RUSSIA just tampers with American databases?

We told our own government with our inaction, and tech purchases it was cool to spy on us. Now privacy is a concern?

Just admit you're salty DNC got exposed for the shytfest it really was

This Russian shyt is a desperate ploy to get us to ignore the fact the democrats (who blacks so desperately depend on) is a shyt show in all actuality

Thanks to Hillary multiple countries know our sensitive information. Where was the outrage when that went down?

 

[the cac mamba]

What did the DNC do wrong?

lets get into it...cause its clear y'all don't read past headlines

its not about 'doing wrong', since they write the rules. its the fact that they were blatantly in the tank for hillary, and it was disgusting to watch. they had pre-decided that she was the one back in 08, never mind that she was being investigated by the fbi

ive said it before, even made a thread on it. didnt get any responses of merit

- how the fukk can the democrats cry about trump winning the electoral college when their own nomination process uses "super delegates"

 

[the cac mamba]

So its cool that RUSSIA just tampers with American databases?

no, it isnt cool. but i have a bigger issue with the DNC's conduct

the russians did the average american voter a favor. hillary clinton and her cronies, not so much