From Wrestlemania 31 to now, who has been more entertaining in matches: Lesnar or Reigns?

[R=G]

That's a valid opinion breh. I'm not really a big Cesaro fan, but he does deserve better. AJ is in an entirely different league imo. And if anyone actually EARNED the spot he's got its AJ

AJ deserves it all but he's not in a different league. He's just presented and booked better. AJ is not gonna outwork Cesaro like he did Reigns, Cena, and Ambrose. Cesaro showed long ago that Reigns and Cena are not on his level in the ring..at all. Not even close.

 

[JoogJoint]

Not really fair when Borck only has like 4-5 matches a year.

Who wants to see a lazy overpaid man doing nothing but German suplexes the entire time?

 

[JoogJoint]

bu-bu-but the beards chant "you can't wrestle" at him

beards are never wrong

It's just like those "we are awesome" chants with the crowd at this point. They only do that sh_t to get themselves over.

 

[JoogJoint]

TSC tries harder to get Reigns over than WWE does.

Or maybe people just like him and don't feel the need to "be cool."

 

[AquaCityBoy]

Or maybe people just like him and don't feel the need to "be cool."

Or maybe the people that don't like him aren't just trying to "be cool."

 

[JoogJoint]

All his matches have been less than 7 minutes and consists of 4 moves

His last match was almost 30 minutes.

Most matches these aren't that long like it use to be.

 

[TheGodling]

People were not fine with the Rumble thing...the fans turned on the match big time and only stayed with Reigns because Batista represented the company. Much like when they got behind Rusev over Reigns at the end of Rumble 2015.

Over as fukk? He was over enough but he wasn't more over than Ambrose and clearly was a placeholder while Bryan was injured.

The entire '14 Rumble was a clusterfukk all the way around but people dug Roman. Yes, those chants at the end were the fans turning against the company, but for the most part people were firmly behind Roman.

And how the fukk was Roman a placeholder of Bryan? They're completely different wrestlers and there's no rule that fans can only root for one guy. Roman was over, simple as that. There's no reason to add an asterisk to that.

 

[JoogJoint]

You'd lose that bet

I don't give a fukk nor do i check for either of them

Y'all always talk about him though.

 

[JoogJoint]

Too bad their great matches are murdering ratings and fan appeal.

Nobody after the Attitude Era can bring up ratings though. Not even Lesnar.

Ratings don't matter anymore. We're not in a boom period.

 

[R=G]

The entire '14 Rumble was a clusterfukk all the way around but people dug Roman. Yes, those chants at the end were the fans turning against the company, but for the most part people were firmly behind Roman.

And how the fukk was Roman a placeholder of Bryan? They're completely different wrestlers and there's no rule that fans can only root for one guy. Roman was over, simple as that. There's no reason to add an asterisk to that.

He was a placeholder because he wouldn't as over as was at the time if Bryan was there every week. Like the fans like Ziggler and Ambrose big back then too but They clearly chose Bryan in any situation where they had to choose. Reigns was on a nice path until they tried to make him big time and treated Bryan as secondary..it was like a backslap to fans everywhere.
They didnt dig Roman at Rumble 2014..it was him or Batista. That shouldn't be hard to understand two years later.

 

[JoogJoint]

Or maybe the people that don't like him aren't just trying to "be cool."

It's fine to dislike him, but some of y'all doth protest against others who like him.

Y'all always up in these Reigns threads though. You'll come over to the dark side eventually.

 

[TheGodling]

He was a placeholder because he wouldn't as over as was at the time if Bryan was there every week. Like the fans like Ziggler and Ambrose big back then too but They clearly chose Bryan in any situation where they had to choose. Reigns was on a nice path until they tried to make him big time and treated Bryan as secondary..it was like a backslap to fans everywhere.
They didnt dig Roman at Rumble 2014..it was him or Batista. That shouldn't be hard to understand two years later.

You're just adding more asterisks, breh. Roman was over, point. WWE ruined him by giving him a push at the expense of others, Bryan in particular, but that doesn't change that for a big part of '14, Roman was over. Point.

 

[R=G]

I didn't add nothing. WWE did and fans saw through it...which is why Roman to start over in 2016. Roman was over enough in 2014 but not bigger than Ambrose, Lesnar , Bryan, or sometimes Ziggler.

 

[Spyro]

People were not fine with the Rumble thing...the fans turned on the match big time and only stayed with Reigns because Batista represented the company. Much like when they got behind Rusev over Reigns at the end of Rumble 2015.

Over as fukk? He was over enough but he wasn't more over than Ambrose and clearly was a placeholder while Bryan was injured.

Yeah I remember when he had that hernia thing and they had him do satellite interviews

His reactions were very minimal during that period while Rollins/Ambrose carried the company

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

TSC tries harder to get Reigns over than WWE does.

I've never seen such a try-hard campaign to go against reality