Gary Johnson: Hillary's secret weapon

[Pull Up the Roots]

Your name should be called "Blind is the man". Facts are facts...

Facts.

 

[thekingsmen]

Facts.

Well debunk it Blind Man.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

He's building his conspiracy around Johnson being a spoiler candidate and trying to tie it together with his VP pick - William Weld - implying that just because he says nice things about Clinton or they have a secret sex bond they're in cahoots. That's like saying Nader was Bush's secret weapon in 2000. It's baloney.

 

[thekingsmen]

He's building his conspiracy around Johnson being a spoiler candidate and trying to tie it together with his VP pick - William Weld - implying that just because he says nice things about Clinton or they have a secret sex bond they're in cahoots. That's like saying Nader was Bush's secret weapon in 2000. It's baloney.

Well....You debunking it or not?. If not...out my thread. Nader wasnt anyones weapon.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Well....You debunking it or not?. If not...out my thread. Nader wasnt anyones weapon.

It's bullshyt for the reasons you quoted. Believing this means you also believe Nader was a secret weapon - because he acted as a spoiler. He's trying to connect the dots using assumption. How can you not see that?

 

[thekingsmen]

It's bullshyt for the reasons you quoted. Believing this means you also believe Nader was a secret weapon - because he acted as a spoiler. He's trying to connect the dots using assumption. How can you not see that?

I'm asking you to debunk the info( I looked up the stuff, all connected). You still talking and not provided shyt. What does Nader have to do with this? Did the guy mention Nader who never got to debate anyone? Nope.


Normally people will debunk things with links that support their defense with actual facts that can't be refutable. I've seen you do none of it...

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

I'm asking you to debunk the info( I looked up the stuff, all connected). You still talking and not provided shyt. What does Nader have to do with this? Did the guy mention Nader who never got to debate anyone? Nope.


Normally people will debunk things with links that support their defense with actual facts that can't be refutable. I've seen you do none of it...

There's nothing there. No concrete proof of anything. It's just that idiot's assumptions. You and the video guy believe that just because HRC and William Weld worked together in the past and Gary Johnson had nice things to say about her = collusion. The idiot in the video posits that they had a secret sexual relationship to seal that bond. And he uses what to prove that? You can't be that dense. I would like to see the stuff you looked up that connects everything, though.

Gary Johnson is as much a secret Clinton weapon as Ralph Nader was a secret Bush weapon. You can't believe one without believing the other.

 

[SirReginald]

They are just 3rd Party candidates. Now, Evan McMullin is another story.