yeah he would have but there's nobody in the middle these days, so dudes like LEbron, hell even Tony Parker can LIVE in the paint.
Lebron would still be great in the old school era, but he would've had to develop his mid-range/outside game alot faster.
This is stupid. I will end this right now
This is from Ne.1
In the 1980s and 1990s, everyone shot a higher FG%
Since Chris Mullin in the early 90s, LeBron James was the first perimeter player to average 25+ ppg on 50+%
Reggie Miller who was a jump shoter 98% of the time had 4 seasons shooting 50 FG%.
Drazen Petrovic had 2 seasons.
Jeff Hornacek had 5 seasons.
Even Ricky Pierce had 6 seasons shooting over 50 FG% from the field in the 80's/90s.
Those type of seasons in the mid 80s to early 90s happened all the time. List of other guys who accomplished that feat: Kiki Vandeweghe, Dantley, Mark Aguirre, Dale Ellis, Clyde Drexler, Chris Mullin, Alex English, Bernard King, Jordan, Bird, Gervin, Worthy, Stockton, Johnson, Dr. J, Thompson, Kelly Tripucka and a couple of others came close and I'm sure I am forgetting some names too (stopped happening around mid-late 90s when help defense improved, overall commitment to defense by teams was greater and also perimeter talent was crap) Now if you compare that to the last 15 years, it has been a rarity for a high scoring perimeter player to shoot 50+%. This isn't meant to belittle Jordan or any of the other players I named at all, but it was a different era and the fact of that matter is that the 80s/early 90s was a more wide open game with a lot less defense.
Purvis Short was putting up 26 ppg on near 50%, and I'm to think LeBron James or Kobe Bryant is going to have problems shooting a higher percentage in that era? Especially with Kobe getting a million semi-transition looks all game long, with horrible help defense (which didn't improve until the Pistons showed how), amongst several other factors.
Just to add from Ne.1
Team defenses now > Back then, especially with the illegal defense rules restricting them (there's a reason the best defensive teams of the era tried to play and get away with a lot of illegal D, when will people understand TEAM DEFENSE is the most important thing in assessing quality of defense)
'
Average athlete now > Back then (watching a typical game, there is a visible difference in lateral quickness/ability to cover floor/recover+contest shots etc etc, the court is and feels a lot smaller now that's why you get a lot of talk of people wanting NBA to expand the sidelines)
Another thing people complain about is stars getting fouls on offensive flops (ticky tack fouls). That has always been the case. Offensive floppers get free throws, it's that simple. That's a reason why Reggie Miller in '90 and '91 averaged more free throws than Jordan did in '92 and '93 (not to mention Mike taking way more shots than him too). You rip through defenders arms, kick out your legs, jump into players, you're going to get the call. You avoid defenders in the air like a D-Rose or MJ (at times)? You're not getting the call. It's just a shame that there's a lot more of that in the game now.
Westbrook and Rose are two of the quickest players I've ever seen, they should be basically unstoppable due to no handchecking/no touch rules right? (especially with respectable mid-range jumpers behind them)? But their scoring efficiency is quite mediocre, what gives?
Handchecking is nowhere as physical as it is made out to be. It DOES make it easier to stay in front of your man, but you could NEVER alter the course of the player through handchecking, or they would call a foul. In the 80s they would let that go but for some reason the 80s physical play is assigned to all of the 90s (and then magically after 1998 the defenses all went weak ). Most of the hand-checking was done in the backcourt anyways. People act as if this handcheck was some giant wall players had to work around. A hand check is exactly what it says it is, a "check". Helps track the player. You could not interfere with the players movement or push on it. Like today, it is a foul. Was back then, is now.
It's funny because if your handcheck in any way obstructed the player from getting to the basket (ie. too physical, nearing a push) you would instantly be whistled for a foul. The handcheck was more physical in the 70s than 80s/early 90s. But still, to be honesst I'm not even sure the 80s were even more physical than today. You see the same number of ridiculous calls (players bytched and flopped less often though) back then as now. The posters making these wild allegations wouldn't know though, they've seen a couple of selected YouTube clips and doubt many have even sat through a single average 80s regular season game. 60+ FTA games were the average back then (look it up). For all the moaning about free throw attempts after 2005, teams on average shot less than 1 extra FT the following year.

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVpPR1pyfkA[/ame]