I'm not saying i feel bad for them specifically, I'm looking larger picture. And the larger picture has a lot of shade to it with a lot of coloring outside the lines all because someone thought they could and they had enough money to get away with it. And like he said, Deadpsin, Kotaku, Gizmodo, Jezebel...these are sites that do good work and aren't just flash in the pan spots


Jezebel does not do good work gtfo
I've never read anything from Kotaku, but I have a friend who works there and I feel bad for him.![]()
I'm liberal too and that's the kind of site that gives liberalism/feminism a bad name.I'm a liberal through and through breh so I fukk with Jezebel and think they bring a lot of good things to light in terms of woman's rights or just providing a different perspective that's needed.
And you should read kotaku man. Their E3 coverage is normally on point

Kotaku is pretty solid not the greatest but they do give insight into the business.Jezebel does not do good work gtfo
I've never read anything from Kotaku, but I have a friend who works there and I feel bad for him.![]()

I'm liberal too and that's the kind of site that gives liberalism/feminism a bad name.
I don't read kotaku because I don't give a shyt about video game media![]()

Daulerio’s co-defendants, Gawker Media and Nick Denton, have both filed for bankruptcy. As a result, the $115 million in compensatory damages awarded by the jury are all Daulerio’s responsibility. Daulerio also owes $100,000 in punitive damages. In an affidavit filed Wednesday, Daulerio explained that his assets boil down to 0.0059% of Gawker’s Cayman Islands-based sister company, 44.7% of RGFree, the parent company of Ratter, which is no longer operational and was never profitable, $1,505.78 in a checking a account, and a small amount of personal affects.
On Monday, the checking account was frozen due to a court order, with a hold for $230.2 million.