More fanoin tactics.
"Lemme call the poster 'white' as an insult.....just because I don't like the fact that he prefers to deal with white people individually when it comes to determining which ones are racist, instead of being part of the 'cacs gonna cac' movement"
Like I care if anyone thinks I'm white
What 'lie' are you referring to? Let me get at the part you bolded:
"The victim's brother said old dude started wildin' out before he even saw who was in the damn car."
The article has a quote from the victim's brother, who relayed information that he got from the victim's girlfriend. I was referring to that in my post. According to him, the girlfriend said (now let me copy and paste from the article this time so there's no confusion):
....but you want to play lawyer and overanalyze what I said and meant in that post. OK fine, so let's clarify everything.
Are you talking about the fact that what I posted gave the impression that the brother was giving a personal account of what happened? Is that the 'lie'? That I should have said the brother was relaying what the victim's girlfriend's account of the incident was, and not his own account? Fine. I made a mistake there - nope......nope, actually, I 'lied'. I apologize for LYING about that.
. Yep, I lied. Couldn't possibly be that I was just quickly summarizing that part of the article, and left out the girlfriend in the process to shorten it and avoid the repetitive phrase "the brother said that the girlfriend said...." (which I'm now forced to use to maintain accuracy).....nope; I lied, and somehow forgot that the lie could easily be exposed/called out by someone simply re-reading the posted article, and seeing that it was actually just the girlfriend's account and not the brother's. I'm sorry for lying about that
Or.....maybe that's not it
. Maybe you're saying I 'lied' about what the girlfriend's account actually WAS. That she never actually said the man didn't see them in the car before coming out and shooting. Yep, I 'lied' about that, too. All she said (according to the brother) was that the old guy came outside, he was screaming Get off my property! and he shot into the air. She didn't say anything about what he did or didn't see at that point. I apologize for 'lying' about that, too. I'm sorry for trying to convince people that the woman magically shared the man's eyesight that night, and as a result she could see that he didn't see them inside the car, before shooting at them. Because clearly that's the believable lie I was trying to pass off. I was NOT simply stating my personal assumption that the geezer couldn't clearly see the occupants of the car or find out their race/ethnicity, based on the details of the girlfriend's account (which suggested considerable distance between the old man and the car possibly affecting whether he could make out who was inside, also the old man not being likely to even wait to see who exactly was in the vehicle, or him not being likely to be able to tell what race/ethnicity the occupants were)
I humbly apologize for these transgressions. From now on, whenever I make up baseless 'lies', I'll probably just stick to calling a random white person racist despite not having any proof. Because apparently that's just fine on here and rarely gets criticized and scrutinized by others, as opposed to someone misquoting an article while quickly making a point
Oh, and lemme weaken that old, predictable response again
