Georgia man shoots and kills latino for accidentally pulling into driveway

[thelonious21]

Especially in the south, nikkas really don't like strangers rolling up the driveway like that.

I've caught myself giving the out the window a few times.

 

[Ohnoits]

fukk him. Racist fukk. Just shot the dude in the head for no fukking reason.

 

[big bun]

Good god that was corny b

 

[thugjr]

robbery attempt aborted after they saw the AK? Just saying

 

[Metta World Movement]

This CaC's racist ways. Like I said, enjoy your blissful ignorance.

I'll just leave you to randomly assume which white people are racist, then

So you're calling other people out for assuming this is a race issue when you're assuming he didn't see who was in the car.

Then go on to post some random pic as if that has anything to do with what the guy MAY have perceived the victim's ethnicity as. Just because of what YOU think he looks like.

I don't know if this is a race issue, but don't call other people out for assuming when you're doing the same

How is it the same thing, when I'm assuming based on what the victim's brother said, and what's actually in the article?

Look at the posts I made, and look at the bolded parts:

The victim's brother said old dude started wildin' out before he even saw who was in the damn car. From the info given, it's just a paranoid old man who went WAY overboard 'defending' his property; nothing more.

Dude literally came out the house blastin', according to this....does that sound like he tried to see who was in the car first?

Keep in mind this happened around 10:00 p.m. according to another article. It's unlikely that he even COULD see who was in the car before lettin' off rounds (or that he even cared to try to see who was in the car first)

My assumptions are based on the info provided about the actual incident itself. I didn't assume that ANYTHING was already a proven fact (which a lot of people on here like to do); I simply stated what the situation most likely could be, based on the info.

Now show me ONE thing in that article that suggests the old man could have shot him because of his race/ethnicity.....that warrants these type of replies:

Dudes a racist

I know an old, racist, southern CaC when I read about him, stop caping.

fukk him. Racist fukk. Just shot the dude in the head for no fukking reason.

If you can find that, THEN you can say I'm doing the 'same thing'

This isn't like the Trayvon Martin situation, where you can assume Zimmerman felt more inclined to follow/kill Trayvon due to his race. THAT'S a case where I can understand the fanoins crying racism, because Zimmerman actually confronted Trayvon and could clearly see what race he was

But in this story, according to the info we have so far......the crazy old man just saw some strange person/people driving on his property, and just came out blastin' as a result of that. There's NOTHING in the article indicating that he got a look at the occupants of the vehicle before shooting. The brother even said that the girlfriend claimed old dude came out of the house yelling and shooting. According to her, he didn't step outside, walk up to them and stare at them before shooting.....he CAME OUT yelling and shooting

How the hell does anyone get 'hate crime' or 'racism' from all of that? Just because he happens to be white and the victim happened to be latino?

nikkas on here are really tryna sell an unlikely story.....that at 10:00 at night, a 69-year-old man heard a car pulling up, looked outside (from a distance, mind you), saw a car in his driveway, happened to get a good look at the driver and his facial features/skin color, who looked like this.....

......and as a result he thought "hmm....I thought he was just another harmless white man, but him and the other people in that car.....they look like some of them latinos that like to rob people....so lemme get my gun and shoot at them. People will understand me shooting at them for driving onto my property, so I should be able to get away with it"



And no matter how much y'all want to play dumb, the average, non-biased person can look at the victim and admit that he could easily pass for white (that is, if they don't immediately believe that he IS)

If you're going to assume he shot him for being a latino based on the article, then you might as well assume he shot him because he hates dudes with weak-ass facial hair, or because he hated the type of car he drove, or some other shyt not even suggested in the article in any way

Oh, and before someone else gets to do it.....

 

[Mowgli]

robbery attempt aborted after they saw the AK? Just saying

Only if they cant verify the friends house they claimed to be trying to find.

 

[Da Jungles]

How is it the same thing, when I'm assuming based on what the victim's brother said, and what's actually in the article?

Look at the posts I made, and look at the bolded parts:

No, how about you look at the bold.

Wow. Y'all ALREADY off and running with the race shyt.

The victim's brother said old dude started wildin' out before he even saw who was in the damn car. From the info given, it's just a paranoid old man who went WAY overboard 'defending' his property; nothing more.

That was NEVER said in the article or even implied. You made up a complete lie. There was no reason to even assume that. Just like there is no reason to assume this is a race issue.

We're not in the 2nd grade. This whole "what I said isn't as bad as what they said" thing isn't necessary. Your assumption and theirs may not be in the same car, but you're definitely headed in the same direction.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

to be casper status cuz I do this shyt all the time

 

[Sam Peel]

@Anothergirl is happy

 

[Anothergirl]

why did i get called here?

 

[DerrtySouthpaw]

he look like a whiteboy to me. and i hope obama takes all these old cacs guns they are losing they shyt out here. R.I.P

 

[DeuceZ]

leave Medellin Colombia and get killed in Georgia

 

[Ziggiy]

somebody should kill a whiteman and scream self defense with a legal gun

maybe thats what we shoudl start doing imo

see how far that goes

They'd have to build concentration camps to house all of us....

 

[Born2BKing]

No, how about you look at the bold.




That was NEVER said in the article or even implied. You made up a complete lie. There was no reason to even assume that. Just like there is no reason to assume this is a race issue.

We're not in the 2nd grade. This whole "what I said isn't as bad as what they said" thing isn't necessary. Your assumption and theirs may not be in the same car, but you're definitely headed in the same direction.

Keep capin for these CaC's if it makes you feel better. Enjoy your blissful ignorance.

But the brother never said what you said he said.

Just ignore @Mr. Movement brehs. He is just a posing white dude on here tryna be black. Funny how he has an issue with race being brought up here but you'll catch him co-signing race being brought up in any negative thread about black people.

 

[Metta World Movement]

Just ignore @Mr. Movement brehs. He is just a posing white dude on here tryna be black. Funny how he has an issue with race being brought up here but you'll catch him co-signing race being brought up in any negative thread about black people.

More fanoin tactics.

"Lemme call the poster 'white' as an insult.....just because I don't like the fact that he prefers to deal with white people individually when it comes to determining which ones are racist, instead of being part of the 'cacs gonna cac' movement"

Like I care if anyone thinks I'm white

No, how about you look at the bold.




That was NEVER said in the article. You made up a complete lie based off an ASSUMPTION.

We're not in the 2nd grade. This whole "what I said isn't as bad as what they said" thing isn't necessary. Your assumption and theirs may not be in the same car, but you're definitely headed in the same direction.

What 'lie' are you referring to? Let me get at the part you bolded:

"The victim's brother said old dude started wildin' out before he even saw who was in the damn car."

The article has a quote from the victim's brother, who relayed information that he got from the victim's girlfriend. I was referring to that in my post. According to him, the girlfriend said (now let me copy and paste from the article this time so there's no confusion):

“Basically, what happened is they were looking for one of my brother’s girlfriend’s friends,” says his brother David E. Diaz-Valencia, 23. “The guy came outside and my brother’s girlfriend said he was screaming, ‘Get off my property!’ and he shot into the air. My brother was backing out fast because he was scared and he rolled down the window to say he was sorry and he was not doing anything wrong. Then the guy shot him in his head.”

....but you want to play lawyer and overanalyze what I said and meant in that post. OK fine, so let's clarify everything.

Are you talking about the fact that what I posted gave the impression that the brother was giving a personal account of what happened? Is that the 'lie'? That I should have said the brother was relaying what the victim's girlfriend's account of the incident was, and not his own account? Fine. I made a mistake there - nope......nope, actually, I 'lied'. I apologize for LYING about that. . Yep, I lied. Couldn't possibly be that I was just quickly summarizing that part of the article, and left out the girlfriend in the process to shorten it and avoid the repetitive phrase "the brother said that the girlfriend said...." (which I'm now forced to use to maintain accuracy).....nope; I lied, and somehow forgot that the lie could easily be exposed/called out by someone simply re-reading the posted article, and seeing that it was actually just the girlfriend's account and not the brother's. I'm sorry for lying about that

Or.....maybe that's not it . Maybe you're saying I 'lied' about what the girlfriend's account actually WAS. That she never actually said the man didn't see them in the car before coming out and shooting. Yep, I 'lied' about that, too. All she said (according to the brother) was that the old guy came outside, he was screaming ‘Get off my property!’ and he shot into the air. She didn't say anything about what he did or didn't see at that point. I apologize for 'lying' about that, too. I'm sorry for trying to convince people that the woman magically shared the man's eyesight that night, and as a result she could see that he didn't see them inside the car, before shooting at them. Because clearly that's the believable lie I was trying to pass off. I was NOT simply stating my personal assumption that the geezer couldn't clearly see the occupants of the car or find out their race/ethnicity, based on the details of the girlfriend's account (which suggested considerable distance between the old man and the car possibly affecting whether he could make out who was inside, also the old man not being likely to even wait to see who exactly was in the vehicle, or him not being likely to be able to tell what race/ethnicity the occupants were)

I humbly apologize for these transgressions. From now on, whenever I make up baseless 'lies', I'll probably just stick to calling a random white person racist despite not having any proof. Because apparently that's just fine on here and rarely gets criticized and scrutinized by others, as opposed to someone misquoting an article while quickly making a point


Oh, and lemme weaken that old, predictable response again