get these nets
Veteran
If you feel sorry for a repeat offender getting sentenced for crimes he actually did, please add me to your ignore list.
Get Hit With Them Football Numbers At Sentencing Brehs
- Thread starter KyokushinKarateMan
- Start date
If he wasn't caught, I'm sure he would have been doing the same thing until he catches a body
Nah, "5-8" years? You a straight dumbass, bruh
dumbass dont cry now nikka 
If you breaking into peoples homes with a gun the potential for someone to get killed is high. Throw the book at em.
KyokushinKarateMan
Train hard, fight easy
This dude got nba all-star game numbers
Residual daps brought me back to this thread and I’m seeing this video for the first time. What an enjoyable and satisfying watch it was.
Every tear that dropped, every sob that fell from his lips - just absolutely amazing.
And yeah he definitely got hit with NBA Allstar game numbers
iceberg_is_on_fire
Wearing Lions gear when it wasn't cool
Dope video, will download and show my kids. No remorse for fukk nikkas like this.
KyokushinKarateMan
Train hard, fight easy
The repost of this thread brought me back here and mannn, those screams and wails of pain and agony after they dragged him out of the courtroom, it never gets old 
Mindfield333
Superstar
Should’ve been smarter and did fraud if you were gonna do crime
This dude got nba all-star game numbers
I say Gaaah dayuuuuuum…… they hit him wit them mega millions lottery draw numbers, sheesh
Last edited:
KyokushinKarateMan
Train hard, fight easy
Breh was trying to appeal 
The link to the full 20 page appeals court docket is here:
I’ve quoted a few of the juicy parts:
“Howse did not raise any issue challenging the trial court’s imposition of the maximum sentence on each individual count or challenge the trial court’s imposition of consecutive sentences. This court will only address assignments of error that are raised in the appeal. See App.R. 12 (“[A] court of appeals shall * * * [d]etermine the appeal on its merits on the assignments of error set forth in the briefs under App.R. 16, the record on appeal under App.R. 9, and, unless waived, the oral argument under App.R. 21.”
“The burglary, aggravated burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, and kidnapping counts carried one- and three-year firearm, notice of prior conviction, and repeat violent offender specifications. The grand theft and theft carried one- and three-year firearm specifications. The charges arose after two incidents that occurred within “a span of less than 48 hours.” First, around 12:00 a.m. on September 13, 2018, a female victim walked into her bedroom and noticed that the screen door was open. She then saw a pair of shoes “sticking up from the side of the bed.” A man jumped up and pointed a gun at her. She screamed, ran into her bathroom, locked the door, and called 911. The second incident occurred around 8:30 p.m. on September 14, 2018. A male victim noticed that a light was on in his barn, which had been converted to a living area with a bar, entertainment area, and an office. The barn was approximately 20 yards from the house. The victim walked to the barn and was going to turn the light off when Howse “pops up from behind the bar, threatens to shoot [the victim], points a gun at him, [and] starts asking him where money is.” Howse then noticed that there was a safe in the barn. Howse pointed the gun at the victim’s head and made him walk to the safe and open it. Once the safe was open, Howse made the victim get on the ground. At this point, the victim noticed that Howse had “a GPS monitor on his ankle.” Howse rummaged through the safe and found a leather handbag. Howse filled the handbag with a handgun, alcohol, headphones, a camera, and equipment for the camera. Howse then began asking the victim where the money was. The victim stated that he did not have any money on him because it was in the house. After approximately 30 minutes, Howse took the victim by gunpoint from the barn to his house. Howse asked the victim who was in the house. The victim responded that his wife and children were in the house and that “he wasn’t getting in the expletive house.” When the victim swore at Howse, Howse threatened to shoot him in the head. The victim cracked the door open and yelled to his wife, “Give me all the money you can find.” The victim’s wife grabbed the money from her husband’s wallet and realized that they were being robbed. The victim’s wife gave the money to her husband, who then gave it to Howse. The victim’s wife then called 911. As Howse was picking up “his bag” to put the money in it, the victim was able to escape and lock himself in his house. The victim ran upstairs to get his gun and waited for police to arrive. Police found Howse through the GPS monitor on his ankle.”
The link to the full 20 page appeals court docket is here:
I’ve quoted a few of the juicy parts:
“Howse did not raise any issue challenging the trial court’s imposition of the maximum sentence on each individual count or challenge the trial court’s imposition of consecutive sentences. This court will only address assignments of error that are raised in the appeal. See App.R. 12 (“[A] court of appeals shall * * * [d]etermine the appeal on its merits on the assignments of error set forth in the briefs under App.R. 16, the record on appeal under App.R. 9, and, unless waived, the oral argument under App.R. 21.”
“The burglary, aggravated burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, and kidnapping counts carried one- and three-year firearm, notice of prior conviction, and repeat violent offender specifications. The grand theft and theft carried one- and three-year firearm specifications. The charges arose after two incidents that occurred within “a span of less than 48 hours.” First, around 12:00 a.m. on September 13, 2018, a female victim walked into her bedroom and noticed that the screen door was open. She then saw a pair of shoes “sticking up from the side of the bed.” A man jumped up and pointed a gun at her. She screamed, ran into her bathroom, locked the door, and called 911. The second incident occurred around 8:30 p.m. on September 14, 2018. A male victim noticed that a light was on in his barn, which had been converted to a living area with a bar, entertainment area, and an office. The barn was approximately 20 yards from the house. The victim walked to the barn and was going to turn the light off when Howse “pops up from behind the bar, threatens to shoot [the victim], points a gun at him, [and] starts asking him where money is.” Howse then noticed that there was a safe in the barn. Howse pointed the gun at the victim’s head and made him walk to the safe and open it. Once the safe was open, Howse made the victim get on the ground. At this point, the victim noticed that Howse had “a GPS monitor on his ankle.” Howse rummaged through the safe and found a leather handbag. Howse filled the handbag with a handgun, alcohol, headphones, a camera, and equipment for the camera. Howse then began asking the victim where the money was. The victim stated that he did not have any money on him because it was in the house. After approximately 30 minutes, Howse took the victim by gunpoint from the barn to his house. Howse asked the victim who was in the house. The victim responded that his wife and children were in the house and that “he wasn’t getting in the expletive house.” When the victim swore at Howse, Howse threatened to shoot him in the head. The victim cracked the door open and yelled to his wife, “Give me all the money you can find.” The victim’s wife grabbed the money from her husband’s wallet and realized that they were being robbed. The victim’s wife gave the money to her husband, who then gave it to Howse. The victim’s wife then called 911. As Howse was picking up “his bag” to put the money in it, the victim was able to escape and lock himself in his house. The victim ran upstairs to get his gun and waited for police to arrive. Police found Howse through the GPS monitor on his ankle.”
KyokushinKarateMan
Train hard, fight easy
“The trial court sentenced Howse as follows:
Count 1 (aggravated burglary relating to the first female victim) — 11 years consecutive to three years for the firearm specification
Count 2 (burglary relating to the first female victim) — merged with Count 1
Count 3 (weapons disability) — 36 months
Count 4 (aggravated burglary relating to the male victim) — 11 years
Count 5 (aggravated robbery relating to the male victim) — 11 years consecutive to three years for the firearm specification
Count 6 (robbery relating to the second female victim) — 11 years consecutive to three years for the firearm specification
Count 7 (kidnapping relating to the male victim) — 11 years consecutive to three years for the firearm specification
Count 8 (weapons disability) — 36 months
Count 9 (grand theft) — merged with Count 5
Count 10 (theft) — merged with Count 5
Count 11 (disrupting public service) — 12 months “
Count 1 (aggravated burglary relating to the first female victim) — 11 years consecutive to three years for the firearm specification
Count 2 (burglary relating to the first female victim) — merged with Count 1
Count 3 (weapons disability) — 36 months
Count 4 (aggravated burglary relating to the male victim) — 11 years
Count 5 (aggravated robbery relating to the male victim) — 11 years consecutive to three years for the firearm specification
Count 6 (robbery relating to the second female victim) — 11 years consecutive to three years for the firearm specification
Count 7 (kidnapping relating to the male victim) — 11 years consecutive to three years for the firearm specification
Count 8 (weapons disability) — 36 months
Count 9 (grand theft) — merged with Count 5
Count 10 (theft) — merged with Count 5
Count 11 (disrupting public service) — 12 months “
KyokushinKarateMan
Train hard, fight easy
His appeal:
“The trial court ran Counts 1, 3, 5, 6, and 8 consecutive to one another and all other counts concurrent to those and each other, for an aggregate sentence of 45 years in prison (39 years plus 72 months). The trial court imposed a mandatory period of five years of postrelease control and $2,180 in restitution to the male victim. The court also ordered Howse to pay costs. It is from this judgment that Howse now appeals. II. Mental Health Court In his first assignment of error, Howse argues that his trial court erred and violated “his due process privilege” when it chose not to assign him to the mental health and developmental disabilities (“MHDD”) docket. In late October 2018, Howse’s first appointed counsel filed a motion to determine Howse’s eligibility in the mental health court. In the motion, defense counsel stated that transfer to the mental health court is appropriate when a defendant has a “severe mental illness with psychotic features,” which he asserted would qualify Howse. Defense counsel stated that when he met with Howse at the county jail, Howse informed him that he had previously been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder from when he discovered his uncle’s body after he had shot himself. Defense counsel further stated that even “more compelling” was the fact that Howse told him that he had been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia when he was in the Cuyahoga County Juvenile Detention Center around 2010. Based upon Howse’s possible posttraumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”) and paranoid schizophrenia diagnoses, defense counsel maintained that Howse should be evaluated by the court’s psychiatric clinic to determine if he should be placed in mental health court.”
“The trial court ran Counts 1, 3, 5, 6, and 8 consecutive to one another and all other counts concurrent to those and each other, for an aggregate sentence of 45 years in prison (39 years plus 72 months). The trial court imposed a mandatory period of five years of postrelease control and $2,180 in restitution to the male victim. The court also ordered Howse to pay costs. It is from this judgment that Howse now appeals. II. Mental Health Court In his first assignment of error, Howse argues that his trial court erred and violated “his due process privilege” when it chose not to assign him to the mental health and developmental disabilities (“MHDD”) docket. In late October 2018, Howse’s first appointed counsel filed a motion to determine Howse’s eligibility in the mental health court. In the motion, defense counsel stated that transfer to the mental health court is appropriate when a defendant has a “severe mental illness with psychotic features,” which he asserted would qualify Howse. Defense counsel stated that when he met with Howse at the county jail, Howse informed him that he had previously been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder from when he discovered his uncle’s body after he had shot himself. Defense counsel further stated that even “more compelling” was the fact that Howse told him that he had been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia when he was in the Cuyahoga County Juvenile Detention Center around 2010. Based upon Howse’s possible posttraumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”) and paranoid schizophrenia diagnoses, defense counsel maintained that Howse should be evaluated by the court’s psychiatric clinic to determine if he should be placed in mental health court.”
KyokushinKarateMan
Train hard, fight easy
“According to the his “educational history,” Howse reportedly received his GED in 2015 “and was enrolled in business administration classes at Cuyahoga Community College for about three weeks prior to his arrest.” During the “mental status evaluation,” the psychologist reported that Howse’s “thought processes were intact and his statements were consistent and coherent.” The psychologist reported that Howse’s IQ was 73. Based on his IQ results, the psychologist diagnosed Howse with borderline intellectual functioning. She concluded that Howse met the criteria for mental health court because persons with an IQ under 75 are eligible. The psychologist further diagnosed Howse with PTSD, which resulted from Howse watching his uncle shoot himself in front of Howse when he was four years old. She also stated that Howse experienced symptoms of depression, and met the criteria for alcohol and cannabis use disorder based upon Howse’s report of such use.”