GIL SCOTT-CRACK: “I’M NOT SURE HOW MJ WOULD HAVE MORE OFFENSIVE IMPACT IN THIS ERA THAN STEPH.”

[rbksNgirbauds]

Kobe, tmac, harden off top of my head

None of those dudes did anything different than what Steph is doing when they had shyt rosters. Scraping and clawing their way to a playoff spot

And the Dubs sans Steph is a shyt roster. Dudes were projected to finish 14th in the West after Klay went down and Oubre was picked up.
And are statistically the worse offense of all time...yes I said of all time, when Steph is off the court. That's a fact

You just revising history because you're a fan of those players more

 

[qnsfinest]

Obviously the warriors roster is not built to compete for a ring but you can’t tell me this team shouldn’t be atleast in the playoff race.

No way a team with roster like spurs, blazers (CJ and nurkic missing the whole season), even mavs with KP out to begin the season should have a better record than the warriors. Shyt even the grizzlies are keeping pace with warriors.

Steph supposed to be top 5, this should at the very least be a 6-7 seed.

 

[Lakerman0834]

Obviously the warriors roster is not built to compete for a ring but you can’t tell me this team shouldn’t be atleast in the playoff race.

No way a with roster like spurs, blazers (CJ and nurkic missing the whole season), even mavs with KP out to begin the season should have a better record than the warriors. Shyt even the grizzlies are keeping pace with warriors.

Steph supposed to be top 5, this should at the very least be a 6-7 seed.

They don’t wanna hear that tho. Kobe had Walton kwame and smush and got them to payoffs

 

[Don Homer]

Y’all nikkas smoke crack.

the warriors are a top offensive team when Steph is on the floor...with shyt spacing, and no consistent scoring

steph plays 36 mins a game


When Steph is off the court, the offense turns to shyt. Arguably the worst offense in the history of the sport, I bet


Which other team has a player leave and the offense turns to the WOAT in all of basketball’s history?

Steph is doing what needs to be done.

let’s not act like if Mychal Mulder, Juan Toscano Anderson, Looney (who moves like he’s 80 years old and he is not even 26), damion lee, Kent Bazeless, brad wannamaker, etc are great role players, or even good. Not even decent. Y’all wouldn’t want those nikkas on ur team and u know it. They’re 13th/14th men-tier players

 

[Amare's Right Hook]

They literally created Mark Price and with a loud wife... and made him a superstar. One of the most amazing achievements I've seen in a while

 

[Luke Cage]

The thing i like about MJ comparisons is knowing the will pretty much cease once the currently active player retires and will be replaced by MJ vs whoever the never big star is. Thats testiment to MJ's impact right there. I remember when it was MJ vs Grant Hill, MJ vs Kobe, MJ vs Tracy Mcgrady, now MJ vs Lebron. and MJ vs Curry etc. If they start comparing everybody to Curry instead of MJ, i'll know he took his spot. until then

 

[Kunty McPhuck]

Obviously the warriors roster is not built to compete for a ring but you can’t tell me this team shouldn’t be atleast in the playoff race.

No way a with roster like spurs, blazers (CJ and nurkic missing the whole season), even mavs with KP out to begin the season should have a better record than the warriors. Shyt even the grizzlies are keeping pace with warriors.

Steph supposed to be top 5, this should at the very least be a 6-7 seed.

That's all fine and well but don't have a consistent 2nd scorer who can go for 25+ regularly. Wiggins will go for 20+ every 4/5 th game. Oubre has more 9 pts or less games then he has 20+ games. In this free scoring era that just isn't good enough from your 2nd and 3rd options with or without Steph.

And nor do they have a consistent 3 hitter either. You got Steph at 4.7 and then then next best is Wiggins at 1.7. While other teams have at least 2 players hitting 2+ and some have 3 and 4 players hitting over 2+ 3's a game.

 

[Lakerman0834]

That's all fine and well but don't have a consistent 2nd scorer who can go for 25+ regularly. Wiggins will go for 20+ every 4/5 th game. Oubre has more 9 pts or less games then he has 20+ games. In this free scoring era that just isn't good enough from your 2nd and 3rd options with or without Steph.

And nor do they have a consistent 3 hitter either. You got Steph at 4.7 and then then next best is Wiggins at 1.7. While other teams have at least 2 players hitting 2+ and some have 3 and 4 players hitting over 2+ 3's a game.

I guess what you are saying steph doesn’t make his teammates

 

[CHICAGO]

That's all fine and well but don't have a consistent 2nd scorer who can go for 25+ regularly. Wiggins will go for 20+ every 4/5 th game. Oubre has more 9 pts or less games then he has 20+ games. In this free scoring era that just isn't good enough from your 2nd and 3rd options with or without Steph.

And nor do they have a consistent 3 hitter either. You got Steph at 4.7 and then then next best is Wiggins at 1.7. While other teams have at least 2 players hitting 2+ and some have 3 and 4 players hitting over 2+ 3's a game.

WHO IS THE 2ND SCORER
ON THE BLAZERS, SPURS, GRIZZ
THAT CAN REGULARLY GIVE YOU 25?

DID YOU EVEN READ DUDES POST?

WIGGINS IS BETTER THAN
EVERY NUMBER 2 ON THOSE
OTHER TEAMS.

​

 

[Remote]

This video was phenomenal.
It is a near certainty that no one sat down to watch the entire 36 minutes of this video. But it went into great detail with video evidence of Curry's strengths (shooting, off ball movement, finishing, passing and his gravity on the court) and his weaknesses -- many of which centered around his size -- (defensive lapses, occasional recklessness, durability.)

There weren't any analytics to fumble around. Certainly nothing complicated anyway.

I thought it was a very fair assessment of Curry's value.

You would think the so-called Eye Test people among basketball fans would be all over this. The video examples were fantastic.

Of course, the conclusions are up to each person...

 

[Kunty McPhuck]

WHO IS THE 2ND SCORER
ON THE BLAZERS, SPURS, GRIZZ
THAT CAN REGULARLY GIVE YOU 25?

DID YOU EVEN READ DUDES POST?

WIGGINS IS BETTER THAN
EVERY NUMBER 2 ON THOSE
OTHER TEAMS.

​

CJ has 8 25+pts games and he's only played 13 games Wiggins and Oubre combine have 6. Throw in Trent got 3 and Melo got 2 games with 25+. So 13 > 6

Grizz got 5 players in double digits scoring the 4th and 5th scorers avg nearly 13 and 12. Which is higher than Warriors 4th highest scorer.

The Spurs got 8 players in double digits in scoring. 20, 15 13 13 13 11 11 11. Oh the luxury of having 8 players who can score 10+ pts a game. And Murray got 5 25+ pts games on his own 1 less than Wiggins and Oubre combine.

I read his post and answered back that they need a consistent 2nd scorer, which they don't have for their system to work at its proper capacity. Even before KD joined Klay was hitting 21-22 a season and scoring has just moved on since those times.

 

[CarltonJunior]

Obviously the warriors roster is not built to compete for a ring but you can’t tell me this team shouldn’t be atleast in the playoff race.

No way a team with roster like spurs, blazers (CJ and nurkic missing the whole season), even mavs with KP out to begin the season should have a better record than the warriors. Shyt even the grizzlies are keeping pace with warriors.

Steph supposed to be top 5, this should at the very least be a 6-7 seed.

Steph is the only good player on the team right now.

I'm not even sure if the rest of the starting 5 could start anywhere else in the league outside of garbage teams like the pistons. Spurs are pretty deep and Blazers actually have competent role players like Trent, Melo, etc.

By the way, they are still in the playoff race. They have the same amount of wins as the 7th and 8th seed, and you only need to be the 10th seed to compete for the spot. You seem like a hater.

 

[CHICAGO]

CJ has 8 25+pts games and he's only played 13 games Wiggins and Oubre combine have 6. Throw in Trent got 3 and Melo got 2 games with 25+. So 13 > 6

Grizz got 5 players in double digits scoring the 4th and 5th scorers avg nearly 13 and 12. Which is higher than Warriors 4th highest scorer.

The Spurs got 8 players in double digits in scoring. 20, 15 13 13 13 11 11 11. Oh the luxury of having 8 players who can score 10+ pts a game. And Murray got 5 25+ pts games on his own 1 less than Wiggins and Oubre combine.

I read his post and answered back that they need a consistent 2nd scorer, which they don't have for their system to work at its proper capacity. Even before KD joined Klay was hitting 21-22 a season and scoring has just moved on since those times.

NAH THATS NOT WHAT YOU SAID.

NOW ITS GONE FROM A 25PT SCORER
TO ANYBODY AVERAGING 10 PTS.

CJ HASNT PLAYED IN MONTHS
AND THEY HAVE A BETTER
RECORD WITHOUT HIM
SO IDK WHY YOU MENTIONED HIM.

​

 

[Kunty McPhuck]

NAH THATS NOT WHAT YOU SAID.

NOW ITS GONE FROM A 25PT SCORER
TO ANYBODY AVERAGING 10 PTS.

CJ HASNT PLAYED IN MONTHS
AND THEY HAVE A BETTER
RECORD WITHOUT HIM
SO IDK WHY YOU MENTIONED HIM.

​

You asked

WHO IS THE 2ND SCORER
ON THE BLAZERS, SPURS, GRIZZ
THAT CAN REGULARLY GIVE YOU 25?

​

So because it doesnt fit your agenda you are going to ignore the fact that CJ in his 13 games this season scored 25+ 8 times. Did you or didnt you ask who can score 25+ regularly on the Blazers? Yes or No? I was even kind enough to put up Trent and Melo. 25+ totals.

Surely you are smart enough to understand that if a team has 5 or more players scoring double digits for the season that its more by committee than relying on 1-2 players to score all the points. Spurs have had a player score 25+ 12 times not called DeRozan. I mean your Bulls have the best of both worlds. They have 2 16+ pts scorers and another 4 player on 10+pts a game to help supplement what LaVine is scoring at.

Everyone in the West above the Warriors either have 2 20+ pts scorers or have 5-7 players scoring in double digits. The Warriors have neither of those.

 

[CHICAGO]

You asked



So because it doesnt fit your agenda you are going to ignore the fact that CJ in his 13 games this season scored 25+ 8 times. Did you or didnt you ask who can score 25+ regularly on the Blazers? Yes or No? I was even kind enough to put up Trent and Melo. 25+ totals.

Surely you are smart enough to understand that if a team has 5 or more players scoring double digits for the season that its more by committee than relying on 1-2 players to score all the points. Spurs have had a player score 25+ 12 times not called DeRozan. I mean your Bulls have the best of both worlds. They have 2 16+ pts scorers and another 4 player on 10+pts a game to help supplement what LaVine is scoring at.

Everyone in the West above the Warriors either have 2 20+ pts scorers or have 5-7 players scoring in double digits. The Warriors have neither of those.

SO THE BASIS
FOR YOUR COMMENT WAS CJ
WHICH MADE NO SENSE
SINCE THE BLAZERS HAVE
A BETTER WINNING PERCENTAGE
THAN GOLDEN STATE
WITHOUT CJ.

PORTLAND DOESNT HAVE FIVE 10PT SCORERS NOR 2 20 PT SCORERS
WITHOUT CJ.

​