@Gil-Scott Heroin do you have a life nikka? You weirdo

[Cerebral Labyrinth]

I NEVER said or insinuated this you fukking liar. Our argument was based on you saying that James Jones was better for their team than Wiggins was. And I NEVER said or insinuated that the Cavs would've beaten the Cavs if they had Wiggins.

How do you remember specifics like this

There's no way Gil could ever lose an argument.

 

[Regular_P]

Nobody gets posters in their feelings more than @Gil Scott-Heroin

 

[KOBE]

How do you remember specifics like this

There's no way Gil could ever lose an argument.

it's easy when you have consistent opinions and don't jump around often with reactionary shyt.

for example, gil scott still thinks green>crowder even though that's obviously not true, but at least he's consistent.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

How do you remember specifics like this

There's no way Gil could ever lose an argument.

Because it went on for pages and pages. @I AM WARHOL can back me up on this too. It was based on him saying that James Jones was a better player and would get more minutes than Wiggins would in the Finals. This fukk boy @MGM is now trying to replace Jones with Love into the argument, and not only that he's now trying to say that I said the Cavs would've beaten the Warriors if they had Wiggins in the Finals. It all started from him saying this dumb shyt -

I understand you fell trap into the hype surrounding the draft etc... But a rookie (even if he's the 1st overall pick) isn't doing squat in a championship game... Don't be fooled, Wiggins would be the 12 best player for the Cavs right now.. And hes like the 5 or sixth best on a bad team such as the t-wolves.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

it's easy when you have consistent opinions and don't jump around often with reactionary shyt.

for example, gil scott still thinks green>crowder even though that's obviously not true, but at least he's consistent.

Even despite Green's inconsistencies, his highs (coming off a 24 ppg on 60% shooting five-game stretch) are a lot better than Crowder's, and he's a more capable offensive player. I will say this though - it's fair easier to fit Crowder in a team, due to his defense and consistency (he's a better fit for the Celtics). I mean this is the first season Crowder has averaged over 10 ppg - where he's greatly benefitting from the Celtics system (82% of his FGs are assisted).

Green's career - 14 ppg on 44% shooting
Crowder's career - 7 ppg on 42% shooting

 

[Goatpoacher]

How do you remember specifics like this

There's no way Gil could ever lose an argument.

Winning an argument is easiest when you have a winning argument. :jjjjj:

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

Let's ignore the fact that you have 26,000 posts and watch every NBA game of everyday.
Let's ignore the fact that you have an excel sheet filled with advanced stats you find everyday to crunch and put together in threads.
Let's ignore the fact that you're an unapologetic Steph Curry dikk rider with borderline homosexual tendencies.

Today in a thread, I said that it seemed like the refs were pulling for the Warriors against Houston.

This aspie responds by saying that, "I should know all about that, since the refs help out LeBron too."

I point out that when adjusted for minutes, Steph shoots only 1 less FT/game than LeBron despite taking 11 3's per game while LeBron literally lives in the paint.

Gil, incapable of ever admitting he just said something stupid, then goes on to yell at me for "every post of mine being about LeBron."

To which I pointed out that I wasn't the one who brought up LeBron, he was...

This fakkit then literally spends the next 20 minutes blowing up my mentions box, finding every post I've made in the past 2 hours and quoting it with some slick response, and straight mentioning me non-stop.

Why can't you ever just admit you're wrong you weirdo? And breh, you know this shyt isn't that serious right? I seriously fear that you have nothing going for you outside of being the Coli's basketball guru.

GS Heron is a loser and an of the moment dikk rider of the highest order. Don't pay him too much mind

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

They're both benefited from the refs, but Lebron gets away with a lot more offensive fouls.

Warriors benefit as a whole from the refs, most teams do. It sickens me when it isn't the Lakers. :kobe3:

Most teams don't. FOH.

 

[KOBE]

Most teams don't. FOH.

I meant most "top teams" breh.

 

[Made Myself A Boss]

How do you remember specifics like this

There's no way Gil could ever lose an argument.

He's pulling up quotes now that are false representing his position on the discussion..

The thread started was something like " Can we agree that the trade of Love for Wiggins was a bad one for the Cavs"

And my position was no.. his was yes..

To give you some background... At this point last year when the thread was made the Cavs had just lost game 1 to GS in OT....


. Because (follow me now) if the Cavs lost in OT (meaning the score was tied after regulation, without Love) Then that means that Wiggins on the floor would have been about to push them over the hump. Meaning that Wiggins is "better" than Love.(and Love did nothing because he was injured)

And @Gil Scott-Heroin has the nerve to say this when Wiggins had an overall (negative plus/minus his rookie year).. But somehow that's supposed to change miraculously on the Cavs



@Gil Scott-Heroin didn't understand what the definition of "better" means within the context of this argument. (which is having a better then tied score after regulation time) So I got bombarded with 10 pages worth of stats and post of him trying to defend his ignorance.


Not how James Jones got inserted into the argument is because LBJ handpicked him to be on the team, because he wanted a shooter on his team NOT another ball dominated player.. So once again I was tryna explain that on THIS team James Jones does more for them then Wiggins would because, they don't want a rookie handling the ball in the finals to win, this is not the way they are constructed.. So yes.. for THIS team...LAST year.. Jones does more for then Cavs then Wiggins could..

@Gil Scott-Heroin Stop quoting me.. Its over

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

He's pulling up quotes now that are false representing his position on the discussion..

I knew he was Koo Koo for Coco puffs when he tried to tell me that the Cavs would have beaten GS last year had they had a rookie Wiggins in instead of Love on their team..

Nope. Wrong. I never said that. This is all about you saying this dumb shyt -

I understand you fell trap into the hype surrounding the draft etc... But a rookie (even if he's the 1st overall pick) isn't doing squat in a championship game... Don't be fooled, Wiggins would be the 12 best player for the Cavs right now.. And hes like the 5 or sixth best on a bad team such as the t-wolves.

*reads ridiculous comment. Sees rep*

All I see on here, s a bunch of people using smiley faces to respond, but never really saying anything of substance


And this is from people with the "good reps"

When you say dumb shyt like "Wiggins would be the 12 best player for the Cavs right now.. And hes like the 5 or sixth best on a bad team such as the t-wolves.", what else do you expect?

This is NOT ME saying that they would've beaten GS last year if they had Wiggins instead of Love (I've mentioned many times that the trade was the right thing to do) - this is me quoting you for saying dumb shyt.

Here's the thread - http://www.thecoli.com/threads/are-we-still-pretending-the-wiggins-trade-wasnt-a-bad-move.325379/

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

I asked and no one really answered the question.

I respected the system when i first got on here, and when i would get negged it kinda let me know what topics to stay away from etc

But after awhile i noticed people one here just like to pile on... and i was getting negged for opinions that other found somewhat insightful and gave daps for..

So its like whats really the purpose of being docile and tryna play nice..

After i saw how people abuse the system it made me morph into a troll... instead of tryna have civilized discussions with people, i was just like fukk it... just troll harder, so i say unpopular things on.purpose

Like i said i understand why they have it, which is to cut down on the shytting posting and trolling... but if half of the room agrees with what your saying and one ot two people don't then it not a shytting post and its not trolling. Instead of people getting all in they feeling cause of something the read that they dont agree with, they need to let it go..

And all those little messages someone give you when they do neg you... man... id feel like murking someone if they had talked to.me like that in real like.. but cause its the internet im just supposed to let it slide ? Naw thats not how it works...

They way they let people neg others on here unchecked and unwarranted is crazy..

Black people come here from places like Facebook, WS and YouTube etc to get away from all that negativity and its a shame this sanctuary of a forum allows this same shyt to continue.

Here's you admitting to being a troll, yet you out here trying to act like you're talking sense. @MGM lost.

Admit to saying unpopular things on purpose to troll and then try and come across as reasonable brehs.

 

[AITheAnswerAI]

He takes arguing basketball very seriously. In case you hadn't noticed.

 

[Eye Cue DA COLI GAWD]

If they act like a weirdo on the internet, you know they're a weirdo in real life.

@GIL Sott-Heroin

Is the epitome of internet weirdo. This nikka got an addiction to bickering over nonsense like Manziel got to alcohol.

Fall back, nikka. Get a bytch. This ain't the Civil War homie. Nobody gives a fukk about you and your dumb ass posts.

 

[USSInsiders]

If they act like a weirdo on the internet, you know they're a weirdo in real life.

@GIL Sott-Heroin

Is the epitome of internet weirdo. This nikka got an addiction to bickering over nonsense like Manziel got to alcohol.

Fall back, nikka. Get a bytch. This ain't the Civil War homie. Nobody gives a fukk about you and your dumb ass posts.

Gil is a passionate bball fan and I respect him from one non-STEM major to another but at the bolded