nope those players all need a CERTAIN type of team to win.
supperstar to me is a player that no matter what type of team they are on they thrive. your list is all plaeyers that cannot thrive in any system.
for instance:
cp0- cant be the number one option
james har en- self explaintory
pg13- he is a superstar. forgot to mention him
dame- potential but i would like to see him play better d. i think he benefits a ton from having great defensive players around him. seems to be nothing special on D. i would put him on the same tier as cousins, wall, kyrie, ect.) nikkas literally 1-2 years away from being a superstar.
john wall- not a leader, YET needs a jumper BAD
Breh I respect u as a poster but acting as if Chris isn't a superstar... that's suspect breh. He could fit any system in the world and make it better.
Chris Paul is a guy who averages 20 pts on 14 shots breh. His 1st what... 7 or 8 seasons were with him as the sole #1 option and he still put up 10-12 assists and led the league in steals
Paul George. Agreed.
Damian Lillard has certified himself superstar this year. We even saw it last year... But dudes were shy to say it. His average defense is a non factor breh. It's not a plus or a minus. U can make a better case for Curry if that's what your trying.
John Wall- your talking about his intangibles and jumpshot. Your rite he should work on it BUT they are not required and based on his play. He is fits the pure point gaurd/scoring role almost perfectly. He is a superstar.
Kyrie IS on that 2nd tier I agree but Cousins (despite his terrible intangibles, and attitude) is the best big the league has seen in a long while. 28 and 11 is prime Shaq tier.
They are not system players breh
