God is “perfect”, right? What’s the definition of perfection?

[FLYINHAWAIIAN]

nothing is perfect

god is nothing

*

 

[JOHN.KOOL]

Be led by emotion to the brink of illiteracy brehs.

I never once asked what’s THE definition of perfect. I have my definition of it already which, yes, I’ve repeated throughout.

What I have asked, and to no avail, is what is HIS definition of perfect because it is obviously different than mine.

Still with me? Good. Now answer the question asked instead of the question you want to answer.

His definition of perfect is committing no sin, sins which are laid out in his law. Simple as that its not hard to work out.

 

[Lamar Givens]

A good parent wouldn't deliberately set their child up for failure, and this is just in an earthly sense. Why would the standard be lower from a heavenly spiritual sense? The Garden of Eden was only needed because of the chaos right where God resided. Where do you think the temptation came from? A spirit from heaven.

No spirit coming down, no temptation, no earthly issues.

Adam and Eve didn't have autonomy, if they did there would have been no consequence. What God should have done was dealt with the mistakes made in his own realm. As the scripture talk about the original serpent, came from heaven, Nephilim which came down and adopted human bodies to sleep with earthly women.....all this came from no other place than where God resides. I could go on, but this "perfection" really is nonexistent.

Autonomy
freedom from external control or influence; independence.

Adam and Eve had one command to obey and they disobeyed hence their consequence was death and sin and death upon all the earth

There was no chaos in Heaven, Lucifer the serpent was cast out of heaven along with those that rebelled

You need to read the story again because your arguments are in contradiction to the Scriptures

 

[the cac mamba]

Why don't you define what YOU mean by 'G-d', first, instead of assuming that YOUR definition means anything to me in any objective sense?

And, no, "the 'G-d' of the Bible" doesn't mean much to me.

​

gotta hand it to you breh, you're the GOAT vague bullshytter on the site :jaymelo:

acting like the bible doesn't define "god" it lays out the guy who created the universe, and all the rules he left for humans, right down to "i care if you fukk your neighbor's wife". but that isn't enough of a definition of a being

 

[knickscity]

Autonomy
freedom from external control or influence; independence.

Adam and Eve had one command to obey and they disobeyed hence their consequence was death and sin and death upon all the earth

There was no chaos in Heaven, Lucifer the serpent was cast out of heaven along with those that rebelled

You need to read the story again because your arguments are in contradiction to the Scriptures

There was no chaos? Do you understand the scripture yourself? That's why they were casted to earth. You just admitted those spirits rebelled.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

gotta hand it to you breh, you're the GOAT vague bullshytter on the site :jaymelo:

Nah, that'd be Napoleon......or whatever pseudonym he's going by these days. Nothing vague about what I stated.​

acting like the bible doesn't define "god"

It doesn't. It gives Secondary and tertiary attributes, but that doesn't define what 'G-d' is. To make it simple for you, saying 'The glarfignergen is brown' doesn't tell you what a 'glarfignergen' is. Saying " 'G-d' is the omnipotent, omnipresent, etc., etc., etc." has the same issue as the previous sentence. As there is no coherent ontology for the term, you can't tell me what it is or isn't.​

it lays out the guy who created the universe

'Guy' is a colloquialism for 'man' and as far as I (or anyone else knows) neither of those terms = 'G-d'.​

, and all the rules he left for humans, right down to "i care if you fukk your neighbor's wife".

Descriptions of societal mores and governmental/national laws written by 'guys' 3,000+ years ago that form the basis of Western jurisprudence are pretty important and worthy of study.​

but that isn't enough of a definition of a being

No, it isn't. Welcome to Theological Noncognitivism 101.

Continue to show your ignorance of my actual stance on the subject. Makes debating you and making you look stupid easier than necessary.

​

 

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

Ya'll still think God give a fukk about individuals.