God is real brehs

[fscballin]

THINK ABOUT THIS

the word god refers to an idol
gad gawd from 1464 (in the sense of distributing); fortune:--troop.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gad_(deity)


when you are calling on god, you are calling on satan, just by one of his various names.

The Creator only has ONE name. Fearing that name is the beginning to true wisdom. Fearing the name of the devil is the snare which binds the fools on this planet, which gives rise to the wicked powers that be. Calling on the true name of the Creator, the name that Adam, Seth, Enoch and Noah called upon will unlock your potential by having his presence manifest in your life in ways beyond what you have been used to. There is a reason the wicked rulers of this world who practice evil magic also use HIS NAME to continue the exercise of control over this world. They just know if they can continue to have the ignorant masses of the world oblivious to that TRUE NAME, and calling on the name of satan, they can mantain their grip until the return of him who will bring an end to the madness of the world (NOT JESUS which is another name of the devil).

 

[Lost His Smile]

Yotsuba is God.

It says so in a book.

 

[Konjo]

Daniel 7:9 and 10:6 gives a physical description of the Creator

How many scriptural references do you require showing he is anatomically human? i.e. human body parts; head, hair, nostrils, eyes, mouth, arms, legs, feet etc?

How many scriptural references do you require showing that he has powers beyond any on this planet and outside of this planet?

I'm not in disagreement with you on whether or not "God" is anatomically human.

I want to know which Black Hebrew Israelite scriptures you are speaking about. What is the name of this Bible or scripture? Who wrote it? When was it written or translated?

 

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

definitely a higher power out there

idk about it being some man up on a throne shaking his head and wagging his finger at me for fapping tho

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[fscballin]

I'm not in disagreement with you on whether or not "God" is anatomically human.

I want to know which Black Hebrew Israelite scriptures you are speaking about. What is the name of this Bible or scripture? Who wrote it? When was it written or translated?

the hebrew scriptures of were composed of different authors and sections from different tribes/nations. The writing of judah were preserved by sephardic jews and romans who have kept the scripture for personal use in their own ascension. The original manuscripts are preserved in secret vatican archives and in modern day ashkenazic secrets vaults. What you don't understand is, the plan is not to destroy all evidence of an original scripture. The mind of satan is to give you both the truth and the lie mingled, but simultaneously exercising his power of deception to trick you into selecting that lie, without you realizing it.

 

[Konjo]

the hebrew scriptures of were composed of different authors and sections from different tribes/nations. The writing of judah were preserved by sephardic jews and romans who have kept the scripture for personal use in their own ascension. The original manuscripts are preserved in secret vatican archives and in modern day ashkenazic secrets vaults. What you don't understand is, the plan is not to destroy all evidence of an original scripture. The mind of satan is to give you both the truth and the lie mingled, but simultaneously exercising his power of deception to trick you into selecting that lie, without you realizing it.

Wut? So now the Sephardim Jews wrote the Black Hebrew scriptures (which you quoted the King James version earlier) and is being preserved by Ashkenazi jews in a volt somewhere? Are you joking?

Can you give me some examples of the Sphardi Jews who contributed to the scripture?

 

[Versa]

Of course He is.

 

[fscballin]

Wut? So now the Sephardim Jews wrote the Black Hebrew scriptures (which you quoted the King James version earlier) and is being preserved by Ashkenazi jews in a volt somewhere? Are you joking?

Can you give me some examples of the Sphardi Jews who contributed to the scripture?

in 70 AD the temple was destroyed, books were taken away, Jews were driven into africa. Not all jews were taken captive back into rome. The sephardim poisoned our religion. They are the false jews referred to in revelation 2:9 and 3:9. They have been joined by the descendants of togarmah who also claim to be jews who appropriated the name Ashkenazi/Aschenazi. Hebrew scriptures were preserved also by rome, and translated into greek and latin and various languages over time. You are debating whether those scriptures are Hebrew in origin, and I am telling you that not only are they Hebrew, the point of them being Hebrew is to give you a false understanding of the meaning of those Hebrew scriptures by the power of your ignorance. So much so that as opposed to uncovering the truth, you would go to he length of rejecting the true message that is has been covered in deception.

 

[The Don]

Real talk

I've been trying to enlighten the coli breh......He is definitely real

 

[FLYINHAWAIIAN]

Real talk

that's it?

 

[WhiteDawg3000]

I've been trying to enlighten the coli breh......He is definitely real

How do you know it is a he?

 

[Konjo]

in 70 AD the temple was destroyed, books were taken away, Jews were driven into africa. Not all jews were taken captive back into rome. The sephardim poisoned our religion. They are the false jews referred to in revelation 2:9 and 3:9. They have been joined by the descendants of togarmah who also claim to be jews who appropriated the name Ashkenazi/Aschenazi. Hebrew scriptures were preserved also by rome, and translated into greek and latin and various languages over time. You are debating whether those scriptures are Hebrew in origin, and I am telling you that not only are they Hebrew, the point of them being Hebrew is to give you a false understanding of the meaning of those Hebrew scriptures by the power of your ignorance. So much so that as opposed to uncovering the truth, you would go to he length of rejecting the true message that is has been covered in deception.

Are you serious?

You are talking a whole lot of nothing. You don't even know my understand to label it as false. I have not expressed my thoughts or views on this other than ask you specifically as to what you are talking about, which by the way is almost nothing. 70 AD? What temple was destroyed? For the sake of your own creditability it is imperative that you provide specific time, dates, and events.

You keep mentioning Sephardic(im) Jews without even understanding the origin of the word Sphardic. Then you went and quoted a Bible verse from King James version. Why don't you directly quote the Hebrew scriptures and cite your references? Don't worry I can read Hebrew alphabets so provide it.

How can you have the key to the secret scriptures yet continuously quote the most water down version of the Christian (not Hebrew) Bible?

 

[The Don]

How do you know it is a he?

To tell you the truth I don't but the bible refers to God as Him several times.....but we're all made in His image Jesus was God on earth and he was a man so that pretty much sums it up

 

[fscballin]

Are you serious?

You are talking a whole lot of nothing. You don't even know my understand to label it as false. I have not expressed my thoughts or views on this other than ask you specifically as to what you are talking about, which by the way is almost nothing. 70 AD? What temple was destroyed? For the sake of your own creditability, it is imperative that you provide specific time and dates.

You keep mentioning Sephardic(im) Jews without even understanding the origin of the word Sphardic. Then you went and quoted a Bible verse from King James version. Why don't you directly quote the Hebrew scriptures and cite your references? Don't worry I can read Hebrew alphabets so provide it.

How can you have the key to the secret scriptures yet continuously quote the most water down version of the Christian (not Hebrew) Bible?

My premise has been overstated that the hebrew scriptures of judah (i.e.. black jews) has been translated and repackaged as the old testament. You not seeing that is the basis of me stating that you have a false understanding. That is how I know. What evidence you have to support your theory that the Black Jew Hebrew Scriptures translated and repackaged as the old testament is really a watered down version of Christianity is yet to be seen. If you are not sure what happened in Jerusalem in 70 AD in regards to the destruction of a temple, that is simply the fault of your own ignorance. I gave you an event (the destruction of the temple) and I have given you a date (70 AD). Now it is up to you to use your intelligence to research the validity of my claims. And if you can read Hebrew alphabets you should have the correct pronunciation of the tetragram aka the sacred name of the Creator. If you don't even know that, you're understanding of the alphabet doesn't even mean much.

 

[Konjo]

My premise has been overstated that the hebrew scriptures of judah (i.e.. black jews) has been translated and repackaged as the old testament. You not seeing that is the basis of me stating that you have a false understanding. That is how I know. What evidence you have to support your theory that the Black Jew Hebrew Scriptures translated and repackaged as the old testament is really a watered down version of Christianity is yet to be seen. If you are not sure what happened in Jerusalem in 70 AD in regards to the destruction of a temple, that is simply the fault of your own ignorance. I gave you an event (the destruction of the temple) and I have given you a date (70 AD). Now it is up to you to use your intelligence to research the validity of my claims. And if you can read Hebrew alphabets you should have the correct pronunciation of the tetragram aka the sacred name of the Creator. If you don't even know that, you're understanding of the alphabet doesn't even mean much.

Again, you are going off talking points like those delusional street bullies called Black Hebrew Israelites. The concept of blackness was nonexistent in 70 AD therefore your whole premise of black Jews is inaccurate. Your accusation of the Jews known as Sphardim who took refuge in Spain is also in accurate. It is a fact that the King James version of the Bible is the most water down and altered hoy scripture of our time. In any case, I'm open to debate on the issue further.