It's been 10+ years since he last wrestled a match, breh.
I'm talking about ever...lol
It's been 10+ years since he last wrestled a match, breh.
No Brock should of lost to dean Ambrose in that gimmick match and he wouldn't of been hurt .
im aware of brocks physical presence but Ive ALWAYS thought Goldberg was more impressive.
![]()
hogan is 60 and looks tougher than brock
![]()
I mean if Brock lost to dean in a gimmick match his bad ass persona wouldn't be hurtI think you had a Freudian slip here on the injury and timeline I was talking about concerning Goldberg, not Brock.
Past that Ambrose was not going to get the decision over Brock but it could have been compelling.
Art Barr
im aware of brocks physical presence but Ive ALWAYS thought Goldberg was more impressive.
![]()
hogan is 60 and looks tougher than brock
![]()
I JUST FOUND OUT THE GAWD WAS BACK.
I ONLY COME OUT OF RETIREMENT TO WATCH THE GOATS.
WHEN DOES HE WRESTLE?
IS STING STILL THERE?
I mean if Brock lost to dean in a gimmick match his bad ass persona wouldn't be hurt
00000000000000000000000000000022
Sting was injured in his time honored wwf buries and squashes a legend in their go away match.
So, I would not look forward to seeing any of the WWE sting stuff.
As, it offers no payoff for fans who have nostalgia.
When sting was actually do an jimmy conners run for the title if the WWE had any vision.
As far as Goldberg the match is this Sunday and it features the return of the match in 2004.
we never got in good faith quality wise from Brock and Goldberg.
So, I would check it out.
just know the wwf has a track record of squashing anyone who was from a different promotion or era.
who was a draw just for shyt's and giggles and hides behind kayfabe traditions for grapplers way over the hill to job.
So, I would not go in thinking of nostalgia or wwf booking a compelling match between goldberg and Brock.
Art Barr