good read until the end, because every wrestler who passed, didn't die because of effects of the wrestling business but it seems like this article was implying that no matter how they died it was wrestling related
MY BAD, BROTHER!Posted the Deadspin link last night. They're the same, and you might as well give Jacobin the clicks (I read the site regularly), so whatever works:
http://www.thecoli.com/threads/pro-...le-was-convincing-us-it-doesnt-matter.239598/
MY BAD, BROTHER!
I haven't read the article yet, but I will before the end of the day. I'll come back to this and edit my post with more thoughts.
But, if a wrestler is signed by a promotion with a national TV deal, they should be in the screen actor's guild. I really hoped that the Raven/Mike Sanders suit would result in changes in the industry but it was tossed out for being a shallow case, if I recall correctly. Eventually the E is going to fukk up and lose a lawsuit like that one day, though. And it will be for the better of all the performers that it happens. I'm interested in what happens now with CM Punk's contractual status, can the E try to tack on time to his like they are Mysterio's? Or was moving him to the Alumni section of the website their last move, signaling that they won't pursue any further action in his case?
I GAVE IT A NINE POINT NINE NINE OUT OF TEN, BROTHER!No prob. You enjoy your birthday/schilling party?
The Raven case got thrown out due to him taking so long to file suit (Raven was fired in 2003, and I believe he brought suit in 2010 or so). However, if the Lesnar suit from 2005 had gone to court instead of being settled (since Lesnar just wanted to wrestle again), then there might have been a different story. Any reasonably competent lawyer could beat the WWE on a case like this, since the WWE's contracts in no way, shape or form passes the "Right to Control" test.
Yes, they should be in the SAG, and judging from how many wrestlers attempt to get movie roles just to get an SAG card, they at least implicitly realize that as well.
They're not going to go after CM Punk, they just announced that he's going to be in WWE 2K5. Not to mention that them suing Punk or inducing Punk to sue them would be bad news for WWE only. If Punk has to pay the company back, he can do that, but that would probably come at the cost or WWE's privileged independent contractor status. Even if they won a suit against Punk, they'd still lose out in the long run.