Hakeem was 20x better than Tim Duncan - Robert Horry ... 2 titles with both
- Thread starter krazykid18
- Start date
they are saltyI think Hakeem is better than Duncan. Hakeem sneaks into my top-5, while Duncan is just top-10. I wouldn't call it 20x better though - that's kinda ridiculous. Even saying he's "twice as good" would be hyperbole.
I was one of the ones who kept voting for Hakeem to make the Coli top-10, when ya'all let Kobe sneak in instead.
I love all the Kobestans who just jump in with "Of course Hakeem is better than Duncan!" as if they suddenly forgot the whole "ringz" argument exists though.
Or the one's who took this to say, "Of course he played with them both, he knows better!" and then forgot to see him shytting on Kobe.
duncan got as many rings as kobe, and both played in the same conference, legit rivalry. So they hate duncan. Most of these kobe stans never saw hakeem in his prime anyways, but they will pick hakeem easily. If not duncan the shaq and kobe duo would have 5 rings, as the spurs beat the lakers in 99 and 2003, it's a standard fan reaction hating on a player who took their rings away.
My nikka big shot Rob's fukkery knows no bounds
feelosofer
#ninergang
No one is arguing that Hakeem wasn't better than Duncan, but 20X is just severe hyperbole. Hakeem was a lot better offensively but defensively they were close and Duncan is more accomplished.