I said the Thunder had a ton of weapons. They do. Westbrook is scoring less and the team is better than ever, just as I said. You were wrong and stupid..
BULLshyt. YOU SAID THEY DIDN'T NEED WESTBROOK'S SCORING. WRONG. WRONG. WRONG.
Man, look at all the damn weapons on the Thunder. I know you love to play this "but OKC needs Westbrook's scoring!" shyt but its simply not true.
YOU WERE WRONG. The Thunder got done in the 2nd round because they didn't have any scoring outside Durant. THEY NEEDED WESTBROOK'S SCORING. THERE'S NO TWO WAYS ABOUT IT.
Series against the Grizzlies (without Westbrook)
Ibaka: - 12.6 points on 37%
Perkins - 2.3 points on 16% (not to mention he averaged 23 minutes)
Sefolosha - 4.6 points on 37%
Fisher - 9.0 points on 40%
Martin - 14.1 points on 41%
BU-BU-BU-BU-BU-BUT THE THUNDER DIDN'T NEED WESTBROOK'S SCORING BECAUSE THEY HAD ALL THESE OFFENSIVE WEAPONS!
Westbrook is scoring less because he's playing less minutes, because for once they've got a bench that can hold their own. He's averaging the same amount of points per 36 minutes that he did last season.
NOBODY IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD EVER CLAIM THAT THE THUNDER DIDN'T/DON'T NEED WESTBROOK'S SCORING.
-Harden is the best sg in the game, when did that change? Youre wrong and stupid again.
WRONG.
Harden isn't and was never the best SG in the league. He's pretty much the worst starting SG on the defensive end in the league. Leading a team to a 1st round exit, while shooting 39% from the field, 19% from shots besides at the rim/3pointers, choking in the clutch and averaged the same amount of assists as turnovers.
WRONG WRONG WRONG. HE ISN'T THE BEST SG IN THE GAME.
-Never said Harden was better than Russell. You're wrong, stupid and a liar.
BULLshyt. WHY YOU LYING? NOT ONLY DID YOU SAY HARDEN IS/WAS THE BETTER PLAYER BUT YOU SAID IT WAS OBVIOUS TOO AND YOU SAID HE'S ALWAYS BEEN BETTER THAN WESTBROOK.
YOU're FULL OF shyt AND YOU'RE A LIAR.
I been telling you Harden is OKC's 2nd best player forever now and w/ performances like tonight, seems more people are finally gonna realize the same thing.
I think its pretty obvious, actually. He's bigger, smarter, a better playmaker at the 2 position than Russ is at the 1, and can pretty much do everything Westbrook can as well.
Someone gonna give James that max, he's too good to be third fiddle.
YOU WERE SAYING YOU PIECE OF shyt LIAR?
BU-BU-BU-BU-BU-BU-BUT I NEVER SAID THAT HARDEN WAS BETTER THAN WESTBROOK.
WHO'S WRONG NOW fakkit? WHO'S LYING NOW fakkit?
-Griffin's skillset last season consisted of jumping high and dunking.
WRONG.
YOU WERE WRONG ABOUT HARDEN BEING BETTER THAN GRIFFIN. HE'S NEVER BEEN BETTER THAN GRIFFIN SINCE THEY'VE BOTH BEEN IN THE LEAGUE. NEVER. YOU WERE JUST HOPING THAT HARDEN COULD CONTINUE THIS FAUX-RISE AND THAT GRIFFIN WOULD FADE INTO OBLIVION.
BLAKE HAS IMPROVED BUT NOT TO THE POINT WHERE HE WAS ONCE NO WHERE NEAR HARDEN'S LEVEL. YOU WERE JUST OVERRATING (YOU STILL ARE) HARDEN AND UNDERRATING 'SCRUB' GRIFFIN.
ONCE AGAIN LIES LIES LIES LIES.
I give all the credit in the world to players that improve their games like Griffin and Westbrook. I dont however, give any credit to corny fukkboys like yourself that try to twist facts of today to try to redact all the dumb shyt you've said in the past.
Problem is they haven't increased their games to this new level, especially Westbrook, he's just managed to stay consistent more than anything else. I didn't twist shyt. I was right when I Westbrook was better than Harden when you said he wasn't and I was right when I said Griffin was better than Harden and you were wrong saying he wasn't. Now you're switching your shyt up because you realise how wrong you were/are.
Y'know I would've respectfully disagreed if you said that 'it's close between Harden and Griffin, but I prefer Harden' but you had the fukkin nerve to say I was a dummy for thinking 'scrub' Griffin was better than Harden. There's no two ways about that, that was a false statement. No matter how much bullshyt you type out will negate that fact.
We'll see who the dummy is - I'll make a thread asking folk these questions based on all the above arguments and we'll see what the results are... or better yet we'll ask posters of your choice these questions..... since i know you'll respond with some 'but this board doesn't know shyt about hoops' bullshyt.
I WIN ONCE AGAIN. AND YOU LOSE.
