Has Steph Curry Regressed?

[Don Homer]

Care to actually speak on the substantive issue of this post? Clearly posters on here believe there is credence to curry regression argument based on the poll alone. Thus far his stats are lower across the board and his field goal percentage is 82nd in the entire league.

fukk outta here

I cooked u in that LeBron thread and u just negged me and ran away. Don't bother me with your disingenuous nonsense

 

[BigTyme Records]

Duh? He’s 36 lol

 

[Roger king]

All these old guys have regressed, it's supposed to be that way. It ain't 2017 anymore...

Ready for all these dudes to go and really allow the young guys to blossom. LeBron, Paul, Durant, Westbrook, Steph, Harden, George, Kawhi, Kyrie. None of these guys are who they were 5 years ago, all of em can gracefully bow out and go home...

Thoughtful response and I feel reasonable, the question I have is what objective metrics and what non biased evaluation can be used to determine regression or when a player is “washed up”? For example there is a similar thread on this forum with the vast majority of commentary in agreement that lebron has regressed to the point that he is washed up and not a good player anymore. When I look at the stats Lebron has higher points ,rebounds and assists and a better field goal percentage than curry and the difference in team success is 1-2 wins. So are both washed up? If not, why is one criteria use as a basis for one player and disregarded for the other player in comparison. thoughts?

 

[murksiderock]

Thoughtful response and I feel reasonable, the question I have is what objective metrics and what non biased evaluation can be used to determine regression or when a player is “washed up”? For example there is a similar thread on this forum with the vast majority of commentary in agreement that lebron has regressed to the point that he is washed up and not a good player anymore. When I look at the stats Lebron has higher points ,rebounds and assists and a better field goal percentage than curry and the difference in team success is 1-2 wins. So are both washed up? If not, why is one criteria use as a basis for one player and disregarded for the other player in comparison. thoughts?

I think when you know what guys used to look like, the eye test gives the strongest indicator of when a guy is losing it or doesn't have it anymore...

As far as hard stats, it's different depending on the player, I guess. One of the biggest indicators of LeBron's decline is he continually falling free throw rate. He attacks the basket less and less each season and at his very best, it was one of the best weapons in his offense, no one pressured the rim as effectively as he did...

His free throw rate now is under 26%, a new career low. Another indicator, lowest ppg since his rookie year. But I think overall, the eye test tells you everything you need to know. He doesn't move the same...

Same thing with Steph. Fewest ppg in a real season in 12 years, but watch him move. Our eyes know we aren't watching the same guy...

 

[Don Homer]

Thoughtful response and I feel reasonable, the question I have is what objective metrics and what non biased evaluation can be used to determine regression or when a player is “washed up”? For example there is a similar thread on this forum with the vast majority of commentary in agreement that lebron has regressed to the point that he is washed up and not a good player anymore. When I look at the stats Lebron has higher points ,rebounds and assists and a better field goal percentage than curry and the difference in team success is 1-2 wins. So are both washed up? If not, why is one criteria use as a basis for one player and disregarded for the other player in comparison. thoughts?

YOOOO, there's NO WAY this isn't taken from ChatGPT. Absolutely zero chance this was actually written by a human being

 

[eastside313]

He shot one 2 and it was a fat toe on the line, that he missed. So yes, all his points came from 3s. That was the last game I saw, vs BK in November. 8-16 from 3, 8-17 in total. And like I said the single 2 was a failed 3 point attempt

So your original statement was incorrect.

 

[Left.A1]

Stan wars that's all that modern NBA observers are concerned with. It's why the fans of the sport are easily near the bottom of all of the major sports in America

 

[Harry B]

So your original statement was incorrect.

No, I’m just talking about my experience from one game I saw. Where he tried to shoot only 3s, one was called a 2 and it didn’t go in. If his toe was on the line was hard to see. We are not in court of law, we are talking among people who watch the games.

I have not watched his 1000+ games, but I’d assume if I saw one last week and nobody even mentioned it. It has happened before.

Since you are such a Curry expert, tell me when all his scored shots has only been 3s.


If that was the first time, that talks even more to what I said.

 

[BigMoneyGrip]

Steph gave Ant 30 for talking shyt the other night

 

[blackestofpanthers]

There is a similar thread on here about lebron being washed and having regressed and he has better stats

defensive rating as well and he is three years older than curry. I

this retarded nikka thought having a higher number in defensive rating means it’s better. These are the people nikkas arguing with

 

[VegetasHairline]

Care to actually speak on the substantive issue of this post? Clearly posters on here believe there is credence to curry regression argument based on the poll alone. Thus far his stats are lower across the board and his field goal percentage is 82nd in the entire league.

Thoughtful response and I feel reasonable, the question I have is what objective metrics and what non biased evaluation can be used to determine regression or when a player is “washed up”? For example there is a similar thread on this forum with the vast majority of commentary in agreement that lebron has regressed to the point that he is washed up and not a good player anymore. When I look at the stats Lebron has higher points ,rebounds and assists and a better field goal percentage than curry and the difference in team success is 1-2 wins. So are both washed up? If not, why is one criteria use as a basis for one player and disregarded for the other player in comparison. thoughts?

Box score whore!

 

[eastside313]

No, I’m just talking about my experience from one game I saw. Where he tried to shoot only 3s, one was called a 2 and it didn’t go in. If his toe was on the line was hard to see. We are not in court of law, we are talking among people who watch the games.

I have not watched his 1000+ games, but I’d assume if I saw one last week and nobody even mentioned it. It has happened before.

Since you are such a Curry expert, tell me when all his scored shots has only been 3s.


If that was the first time, that talks even more to what I said.

I’m not the curry expert. But i know better than to say something goofy chit like some
Games he only shoot 3s.

 

[Roger king]

x.com
x.com

Yeah curry is clearly showing signs of regression this season base on his play and others are noticing as well

''In Steph Curry's first 20 games last year, he hit 30 points 10 times and 40 points twice. In Steph's first 20 games this year he has hit 30 points just three times and is yet to hit 40. Steph has hit the 30 point mark just 8 times total in his last 43 regular season games.''

 

[BigMoneyGrip]

x.com
x.com

Yeah curry is clearly showing signs of regression this season base on his play and others are noticing as well

''In Steph Curry's first 20 games last year, he hit 30 points 10 times and 40 points twice. In Steph's first 20 games this year he has hit 30 points just three times and is yet to hit 40. Steph has hit the 30 point mark just 8 times total in his last 43 regular season games.''

Listen to Jason Temph brehs, a known lakers and Bron meat slobber…

Go home Roger!!!!!

 

[Damnshow]

I've looked at the stats to see wassup. And there's no red flags in there. Percentages are good and Warriors kept giving their bench a lot of minutes, meaning Curry also plays couple minutes less per game.

I mean he's 36 years old and coming off the Olympics. Him, Bron and KD are old now. To expect them to go hard in this season, after Olympics, is just not how things work. It's not 2012 anymore.